Rover 100 MOT Results

Registered in 1996
45.7% pass rate
from 127 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 100 is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 7.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.1% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.6% fail on Individual lamps
    • 4.7% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Battery
    • 3.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.79% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.79% fail on Rear lamps
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.79% fail on Headlamp
    • 0.79% fail on Horn
    • 0.79% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 19% fail on Brakes
    • 17% fail on Brake performance (91% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 9.4% fail on Rear wheels (170% worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.3% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 3.9% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.79% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.9% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.4% fail on Components
        • 1.6% fail on Pipes
        • 0.79% fail on Hoses
      • 0.79% fail on Operation
      • 0.79% fail on Leaks
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
    • 0.79% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.79% fail on Pedal
        • 0.79% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.79% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.79% fail on Clevis joint
  • 17% fail on Suspension
    • 7.1% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 5.5% fail on Subframe mounting (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.9% fail on Fluid suspension (81 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Operation (160 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Suspension unit (78 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.1% fail on Condition (17 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.4% fail on Sub-frames (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Attachment
    • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.79% fail on General condition
    • 0.79% fail on Front suspension joints
  • 17% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 13% fail on Emissions (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.79% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.79% fail on Tank
  • 13% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (130% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Body condition
    • 4.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 4.7% fail on Chassis
    • 2.4% fail on Seats (4 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Passengers (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Drivers
    • 1.6% fail on Doors
      • 1.6% fail on Drivers (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  • 9.4% fail on Tyres
    • 7.9% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Tread depth
  • 5.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.79% fail on Requirements
      • 0.79% fail on Condition
  • 5.5% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 4.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.79% fail on Wipers
  • 2.4% fail on Steering
    • 2.4% fail on Steering system
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.79% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.79% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.79% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages