Rover 100 MOT Results

Registered in 1996

53.4% pass rate

from 103 tests in 2020

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1996 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 100 is unusually good or bad.

18% fail on Brakes
- 16% fail on Brake performance (110% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 9.7% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 9.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
      - 3.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 8.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (180% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 8.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (190% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 6.8% fail on Service brake performance
    - 6.8% fail on Rbt
      - 6.8% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 3.9% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 3.9% fail on Rbt
      - 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 1.9% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (9 times worse than other 1996 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.9% fail on Flexible brake hoses
- 1.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 0.97% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 0.97% fail on Brake pads
  - 0.97% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
    - 0.97% fail on Clevis joint
- 0.97% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.97% fail on Lever
- 0.97% fail on Hydraulic systems
  - 0.97% fail on Brake fluid
18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 6.8% fail on Headlamp aim
- 6.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 6.8% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.97% fail on Headlamps
  - 0.97% fail on Headlamp
- 0.97% fail on Direction indicators
  - 0.97% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.97% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.97% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.97% fail on Battery(ies)
15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (94% worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 15% fail on Spark ignition (120% worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 8.7% fail on Catalyst emissions
    - 3.9% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 0.97% fail on Emission control equipment
      - 0.97% fail on Catalytic converter
    - 0.97% fail on Non catalyst emissions
12% fail on Suspension
- 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
  - 1.9% fail on Suspension arm (6 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes
  - 0.97% fail on Ball joint
  - 0.97% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.9% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (52 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 2.9% fail on Suspension unit (123 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Operation
- 3.9% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
- 2.9% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
  - 0.97% fail on Sub-frame
11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 3.9% fail on Chassis
  - 3.9% fail on Chassis condition
- 1.9% fail on Integral vehicle structure
  - 0.97% fail on Sub-frame
    - 0.97% fail on Sub-frame condition
  - 0.97% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.9% fail on Exhaust system
- 1.9% fail on Doors
  - 1.9% fail on Driver's door (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
    - 1.9% fail on Door condition (12 times worse than other 1996 cars)
  - 0.97% fail on Front passenger's door
    - 0.97% fail on Door condition
- 0.97% fail on Body
  - 0.97% fail on Panel
- 0.97% fail on Floor
7.8% fail on Tyres
- 4.9% fail on Tread depth
- 3.9% fail on Condition
6.8% fail on Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.9% fail on Seat belts
  - 3.9% fail on Prescribed areas
1.9% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 1.9% fail on Registration plates
0.97% fail on Steering
- 0.97% fail on Steering linkage components
  - 0.97% fail on Track rod end