Rover 100 MOT Results
Registered in 199553.7% pass rate
from 54 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 100 is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Brakes
(150% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
24% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
17% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 15% fail on Service brake imbalance (6 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
17% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
11% fail on
Service brake performance
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
11% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 9.3% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 1.9% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
11% fail on
Rbt
(3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 7.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.7% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
- 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
-
3.7% fail on
Rbt
-
17% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(4 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.9% fail on Lever
- 1.9% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.9% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
1.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.9% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 1.9% fail on Cable
-
1.9% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
-
24% fail on
Brake performance
(2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
7.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 7.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 5.6% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
5.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 5.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
5.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
5.6% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
5.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 5.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
5.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
3.7% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.7% fail on Headlamp
-
3.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 3.7% fail on Horn
- 1.9% fail on Electrical wiring
- 1.9% fail on Battery(ies)
-
7.4% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
19% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(150% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(140% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
17% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 1995 cars)
- 15% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
-
17% fail on
Spark ignition
(170% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 1.9% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
17% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(140% worse than other 1995 cars)
-
15% fail on
Suspension
- 9.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
5.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 3.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 1.9% fail on Suspension arm
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.9% fail on Linkage
-
1.9% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 1.9% fail on Operation
-
15% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 5.6% fail on Exhaust system
-
3.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 3.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
3.7% fail on
Transmission
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.7% fail on Joints
-
3.7% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.9% fail on
Chassis
- 1.9% fail on Chassis condition
-
1.9% fail on
Body
- 1.9% fail on Panel
-
11% fail on
Visibility
- 5.6% fail on Washers
- 3.7% fail on Wipers
-
1.9% fail on
View to rear
- 1.9% fail on Mirrors
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.9% fail on Prescribed areas
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
3.7% fail on
Seat belts
-
1.9% fail on
Steering
- 1.9% fail on Steering wheel