Rover 100 MOT Results

Registered in 1995
59.1% pass rate
from 110 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1995 cars and highlighted areas where the Rover 100 is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 3.6% fail on Subframe mounting
      • 2.7% fail on Component mounting
    • 3.6% fail on Sub-frames (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Attachment (21 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on General condition (78 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Condition (15 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.7% fail on Radius arms (14 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (15 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.7% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.7% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.91% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.91% fail on Operation
  • 14% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 9.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (190% worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Fog lamp (2 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.8% fail on Front lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 0.91% fail on Battery
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 0.91% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.91% fail on Headlamp
  • 13% fail on Brakes
    • 9.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 2.7% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 2.7% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical components (9 times worse than other 1995 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Cable (10 times worse than other 1995 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Restricted movement
  • 12% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 7.3% fail on Emissions
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.91% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.91% fail on Tank
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 5.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 4.5% fail on Condition
  • 9.1% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 6.4% fail on Body condition
    • 2.7% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 2.7% fail on Chassis
    • 0.91% fail on Doors
      • 0.91% fail on Passengers front
  • 7.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
  • 4.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.7% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.8% fail on Condition
      • 0.91% fail on Attachment
  • 3.6% fail on Steering
    • 3.6% fail on Steering system
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.91% fail on Steering control
      • 0.91% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.91% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages