Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph MOT Results

Registered in 1998
84.8% pass rate
from 112 tests in 2020
(66% better than other 1998 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1998 cars and highlighted areas where the Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is unusually good or bad.

  • 7.1% fail on Suspension
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.8% fail on Other suspension component
      • 1.8% fail on Ball joint dust cover (12 times worse than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension (34 times worse than other 1998 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Levelling valve
      • 0.89% fail on Pipes
    • 0.89% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.89% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.89% fail on Ball joint
  • 5.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 1998 cars)
  • 4.5% fail on Brakes (67% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.6% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.89% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.89% fail on Pedal
    • 0.89% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 2.7% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (84% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.89% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.89% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.89% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.89% fail on Horn
  • 1.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (79% better than other 1998 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.8% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 1998 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Catalyst emissions

Search Good Garages