Renault Zoe MOT Results
Registered in 201675.4% pass rate
from 1,575 tests in 2021
(48% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Zoe is unusually good or bad.
-
10% fail on
Suspension
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Ball joint (33 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
-
3.2% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(14 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joints (21 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.89% fail on Ball joint (39 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Springs
-
0.83% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.83% fail on Coil spring
-
0.83% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.19% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.19% fail on
Other suspension component
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Ball joint (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.063% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(13 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
(90% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Tread depth
-
5.8% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(65% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Stop lamp (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.95% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.38% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.38% fail on Individual direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.13% fail on All direction indicators (17 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.19% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.19% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.063% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.063% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.063% fail on Horn
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Washers (82% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Wipers (71% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.063% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.063% fail on Windscreen
-
1.5% fail on
Brakes
(48% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.51% fail on Brake discs
-
0.19% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(88% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Brake pads (88% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.51% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.63% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.19% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.51% fail on
Rbt
-
0.13% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.13% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.51% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.063% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.063% fail on Pedal
-
0.063% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.063% fail on Lever
-
0.70% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(63% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.13% fail on Attachment
-
0.063% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.063% fail on
Body
- 0.063% fail on Other body component
-
0.063% fail on
Body
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Zoe (2013 on)
Fun and easy-going driving experience, decent ride quality, cabin, range and performance all improved in 2019