Renault Wind MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.2% pass rate
from 784 tests in 2020
(13% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Wind is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 15% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 15% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 15% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Suspension arms (60% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.77% fail on Anti-roll bars (74% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.38% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.38% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.26% fail on Macpherson strut (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.38% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.38% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.13% fail on Wheel bearings
  • 11% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering linkage components (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 9.7% fail on Brakes (36% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.26% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Cable
        • 0.13% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt
          • 0.77% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.26% fail on Plate brake tester (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.77% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.77% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.64% fail on Service brake performance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 0.89% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Hand lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.51% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.38% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.26% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.38% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.38% fail on Lever
    • 0.13% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.13% fail on Other components
  • 6.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors
  • 6.0% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.38% fail on Position lamps (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Position lamp (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.38% fail on Horn
    • 0.26% fail on Stop lamp (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.13% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 3.8% fail on Tyres (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Tread depth (69% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 2.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 0.77% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.26% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.13% fail on Body
      • 0.13% fail on Other body component
  • 1.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.0% fail on Exhaust emissions (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.77% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.13% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.77% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.51% fail on Attachment
    • 0.26% fail on Condition
  • 0.13% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.13% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.13% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.13% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Read the Honest John Review

  • Renault Wind (2010 - 2012)
    Stylish two-seater roadster coupe with a roomy cabin, decent bootspace, efficient and economical engines. Roof folds away quickly and neatly.

    Search Good Garages