Renault Wind MOT Results
Registered in 201061.4% pass rate
from 645 tests in 2017
(33% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Wind is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
14% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 14% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Location
-
2.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.93% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.62% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.62% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.62% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.62% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
0.31% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(80% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.31% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.31% fail on Condition
-
0.16% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.16% fail on Front
-
14% fail on
Coil springs
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering
(10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 12% fail on Track rod end (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Ball joint
- 0.16% fail on Steering operation
- 0.16% fail on Locking devices
-
12% fail on
Steering system
(12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Brakes
(66% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Rear wheels (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Front wheels (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Service brake performance (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.31% fail on Brake imbalance
-
3.7% fail on
Hub components
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.47% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.47% fail on
Components
- 0.47% fail on Pipes
-
0.47% fail on
Components
- 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.16% fail on Electronic stability system
-
0.16% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.16% fail on Linkage
- 0.16% fail on ABS
-
4.5% fail on
Brake performance
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Tyres
- 6.8% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Tread depth
- 0.47% fail on Size/type
-
8.5% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(36% better than other 2010 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.0% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.62% fail on All direction indicators (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.0% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 1.9% fail on Front lamps
- 1.6% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.1% fail on Headlamp
- 0.31% fail on Battery
- 0.31% fail on Horn
- 0.16% fail on Rear reflectors
-
3.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.2% fail on Wipers
- 1.4% fail on Washers
- 0.16% fail on Windscreen
-
0.78% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.47% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.47% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
0.31% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.16% fail on Attachment
- 0.16% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.47% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
0.78% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 0.31% fail on Emissions
- 0.31% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.16% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.62% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.62% fail on Attachment
-
0.47% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.47% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Wind (2010 - 2012)
Stylish two-seater roadster coupe with a roomy cabin, decent bootspace, efficient and economical engines. Roof folds away quickly and neatly.