Renault Twingo MOT Results
Registered in 201577.0% pass rate
from 5,231 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 2015 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2015 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Twingo is unusually good or bad.
-
7.1% fail on
Visibility
(81% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Wipers (93% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Washers (72% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.096% fail on
View to rear
- 0.096% fail on Mirrors
-
0.019% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.019% fail on Windscreen
-
6.0% fail on
Tyres
(38% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth (45% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.7% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Size/type (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
5.7% fail on
Suspension
(76% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.038% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.8% fail on
Springs
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
- 1.8% fail on Coil spring
- 0.019% fail on Mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (8 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.34% fail on Ball joint (10 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.038% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.019% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.019% fail on Linkage
- 0.23% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.15% fail on
Other suspension component
(2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.038% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.038% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.019% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.019% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.038% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.038% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.019% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.019% fail on Ball joint
-
2.4% fail on
Suspension arms
(150% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Brakes
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.6% fail on Brake pads
-
1.3% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(120% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.82% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.55% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
- 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.019% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.019% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.54% fail on
Rbt
-
0.19% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.076% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.19% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.057% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.019% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.019% fail on
Rbt
- 0.019% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.019% fail on
Rbt
-
0.019% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.019% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.55% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.096% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.076% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.038% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.076% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.057% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.057% fail on Lever
-
0.057% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.057% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.038% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.019% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.019% fail on Other components
-
2.6% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.7% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(41% better than other 2015 cars)
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.57% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.27% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.27% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.27% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.23% fail on
Headlamps
(78% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (72% better than other 2015 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.096% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.076% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.076% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.076% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.038% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.019% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.019% fail on Horn
-
0.019% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.019% fail on Position lamp
-
0.019% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.019% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
1.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
2.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(73% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(74% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(200% worse than other 2015 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (4 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested (5 times worse than other 2015 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.038% fail on
Compression ignition
(92% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.019% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.019% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Spark ignition
(200% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.076% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.057% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.019% fail on Other leaks
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(74% worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.84% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.50% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.11% fail on Bumpers (2 times worse than other 2015 cars)
-
0.057% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.038% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.019% fail on Hose
- 0.019% fail on Pipe
-
0.057% fail on
Doors
-
0.057% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.057% fail on Door condition
-
0.057% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.038% fail on
Body
- 0.019% fail on Panel
- 0.019% fail on Other body component
- 0.038% fail on Undertray
-
0.019% fail on
Load security
-
0.019% fail on
Tailgate
- 0.019% fail on Tailgate condition
-
0.019% fail on
Tailgate
-
0.019% fail on
Seats
- 0.019% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.019% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.019% fail on Other boot lid component
-
0.21% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.096% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.096% fail on Condition
- 0.096% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.019% fail on
Airbags
- 0.019% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.096% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.19% fail on
Steering
-
0.15% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.096% fail on Track rod end (69% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Ball joint
-
0.038% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.038% fail on Steering rack
-
0.15% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.11% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.096% fail on Condition
- 0.019% fail on Attachment
-
0.038% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(82% better than other 2015 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Registration plates (82% better than other 2015 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Twingo (2014 - 2019)
Fun to drive in town. Easy to park and manoeuvre. Spacious inside.