Renault Twingo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.6% pass rate
from 4,279 tests in 2017
(7.7% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Twingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.33% fail on Rear lamps
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.3% fail on Individual lamps (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.047% fail on Side repeaters (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Stop lamp (68% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.35% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.047% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.35% fail on Headlamps (85% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.023% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
    • 0.047% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.047% fail on Switch
    • 0.023% fail on Battery
  • 9.3% fail on Steering (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Steering system (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Track rod end (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.023% fail on Free play
        • 0.023% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.023% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.047% fail on Power steering
      • 0.023% fail on Rams
      • 0.023% fail on Other components
    • 0.023% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.023% fail on Locking devices
  • 7.9% fail on Suspension
    • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.3% fail on Condition
      • 0.023% fail on Location
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.84% fail on Linkage condition (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (37% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment
      • 0.023% fail on Presence
    • 0.77% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.77% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Suspension arms (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.56% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.56% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.40% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.23% fail on Rear
      • 0.093% fail on Front
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (71% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Condition (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.047% fail on Attachment (35 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
      • 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.023% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Brake performance (31% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Front wheels (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Rear wheels (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Parking brake performance (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.093% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.023% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.023% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.3% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Pipes (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.070% fail on Hoses
      • 0.070% fail on Leaks
    • 1.8% fail on Hub components (33% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake pads (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.023% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.093% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.093% fail on Pedal
        • 0.093% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.093% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.070% fail on Lever (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Cable
    • 0.070% fail on ABS
  • 5.9% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.5% fail on Condition (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Size/type (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.7% fail on Washers (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.28% fail on Mirrors (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.047% fail on Bonnet
  • 1.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Passengers airbag (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Seat belt pre-tensioner
      • 0.023% fail on Drivers airbag
    • 0.30% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.30% fail on Condition
  • 0.70% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Emissions
    • 0.26% fail on Exhaust system (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Attachment
  • 0.23% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.12% fail on Body condition
    • 0.047% fail on Seats
      • 0.047% fail on Passengers
    • 0.023% fail on Speedometer
    • 0.023% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.023% fail on Chassis
    • 0.023% fail on Load security
      • 0.023% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.16% fail on Registration plates and VIN (63% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plate (63% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages