MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Twingo » 2010

Renault Twingo MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.2% pass rate
from 4,669 tests in 2021
(12% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Twingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Suspension (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Springs (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.3% fail on Coil springs (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Coil spring (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Mounting (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage ball joints (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Ball joint (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.021% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 1.1% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Macpherson strut (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.30% fail on Shock absorbers (64% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.064% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.064% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.021% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.021% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 11% fail on Brakes (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.7% fail on Rbt (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.021% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp) (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.43% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.47% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.45% fail on Rbt
          • 0.43% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.021% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.021% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.021% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake discs (45% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.13% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Cable
        • 0.021% fail on Relay lever
    • 0.71% fail on Parking brake control (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.71% fail on Lever (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
    • 0.26% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (56% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.13% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.064% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.043% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.021% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.043% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.043% fail on Other components
  • 11% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Individual direction indicators (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on All direction indicators (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Side repeaters (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (66% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Electrical equipment (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Horn (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.3% fail on Headlamps (58% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp (61% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.0% fail on Stop lamp (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.13% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.021% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.021% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.021% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.021% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.021% fail on Switch
    • 0.021% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.021% fail on Main beam tell-tale
  • 7.9% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Other components
        • 0.021% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.021% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.064% fail on Power steering
      • 0.043% fail on Other components
      • 0.021% fail on Rams
    • 0.043% fail on Steering gear (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Steering rack (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Steering play
      • 0.021% fail on Steering box
      • 0.021% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.043% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 2.6% fail on Wipers
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.086% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.086% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.086% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.021% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition (22% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Size/type (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.47% fail on Condition
      • 0.021% fail on Requirements
    • 0.064% fail on Airbags
      • 0.064% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (21% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.32% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.064% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.086% fail on Compression ignition (93% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.021% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.021% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.021% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.021% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.34% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.32% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.021% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 2.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Transmission
      • 1.5% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.5% fail on Joints
        • 0.021% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.021% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.66% fail on Exhaust system (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.064% fail on Tank
      • 0.064% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.11% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.11% fail on Other body component
    • 0.064% fail on Doors
      • 0.043% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.043% fail on Door condition
      • 0.021% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.021% fail on Catch
    • 0.043% fail on Seats
      • 0.021% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.021% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.043% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.043% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.021% fail on Chassis
      • 0.021% fail on Chassis condition
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.26% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition
    • 0.021% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages