Renault Twingo MOT Results
Registered in 200959.2% pass rate
from 1,855 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Twingo is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Suspension
(18% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Springs
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Coil springs
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Coil spring (55% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Mounting (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Coil springs
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Linkage (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.43% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Linkage ball joints (92% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.054% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
2.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(38% better than other 2009 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Ball joint
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes (95% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Macpherson strut
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.75% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Macpherson strut (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
- 1.0% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.54% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 0.11% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.054% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.32% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.22% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.11% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.054% fail on Suspension rod
-
9.0% fail on
Springs
(57% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brakes
(29% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.8% fail on
Brake performance
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.054% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.054% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.3% fail on
Rbt
-
0.86% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(58% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
0.81% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.70% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.49% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
- 0.49% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.054% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.49% fail on
Rbt
- 0.16% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Brake discs (79% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.27% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.22% fail on Lever (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Pivot
-
2.0% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(77% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.59% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.59% fail on Lever
-
0.38% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.32% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.054% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.32% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.22% fail on Hand lever
- 0.11% fail on Pedal
-
0.16% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
(12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Prescribed areas
(31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings (80 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Other components
-
0.11% fail on
Prescribed areas
(31 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.054% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.054% fail on Leaks
-
0.054% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.054% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.054% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.054% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
8.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(34% better than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.1% fail on Stop lamp (67% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Headlamps
(70% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Headlamp (72% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.32% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.27% fail on Horn
- 0.054% fail on Battery(ies)
-
0.22% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.22% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.16% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.16% fail on Position lamp
-
0.11% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
- 0.054% fail on Rear reflectors
-
2.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
6.8% fail on
Steering
(190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Ball joint
-
0.27% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.22% fail on Steering rack
- 0.054% fail on Operation
- 0.11% fail on Steering wheel (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
-
6.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Visibility
- 3.6% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers
-
0.38% fail on
Condition of glass
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Windscreen (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
View to rear
- 0.11% fail on Mirrors
- 0.054% fail on Bonnet
-
5.4% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.2% fail on Condition
- 0.38% fail on Size/type
-
4.4% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(52% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Catalyst emissions (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.54% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (55% better than other 2009 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.054% fail on Other emission control equipment
-
4.2% fail on
Spark ignition
(52% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.38% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.38% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
4.2% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.2% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(32% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Exhaust system
-
1.4% fail on
Transmission
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Joints
-
0.054% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.054% fail on Joints
-
1.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.11% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.11% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.11% fail on
Load security
(23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Tailgate
(37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Tailgate condition (47 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Tailgate
(37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.054% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.054% fail on Hose
-
0.054% fail on
Body
- 0.054% fail on Other body component
-
0.054% fail on
Seats
- 0.054% fail on Driver's seat
-
2.2% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.7% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.43% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.43% fail on Condition
-
0.16% fail on
Airbags
(7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Drivers airbag (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.16% fail on Condition
- 0.11% fail on Attachment
-
0.16% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.16% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review