Renault Twingo MOT Results

Registered in 2009
66.5% pass rate
from 1,811 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Twingo is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Suspension
    • 5.5% fail on Coil springs (35% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Condition (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Location
    • 3.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage condition (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.055% fail on Attachment
    • 0.99% fail on Suspension arms (46% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
    • 0.66% fail on Macpherson strut (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.55% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.55% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.55% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.28% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.22% fail on Rear
      • 0.055% fail on Front
    • 0.17% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.11% fail on Condition (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 9.6% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (38% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.44% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.055% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamp aim (55% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.94% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.11% fail on Side repeaters (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Stop lamp (79% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.33% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.28% fail on Headlamps (89% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Headlamp (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Switch
    • 0.22% fail on Battery
    • 0.11% fail on Horn
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.055% fail on Brake operation
    • 2.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Pipes (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Hoses
        • 0.055% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.055% fail on Operation
    • 2.6% fail on Hub components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.11% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.17% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.11% fail on ABS
    • 0.055% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.055% fail on Lever
  • 8.3% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Steering system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Track rod end (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Free play
        • 0.055% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.055% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.055% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.055% fail on Steering operation
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.28% fail on Size/type
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.28% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.17% fail on Bonnet
  • 3.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Exhaust system (52% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.055% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.055% fail on Cap
    • 0.055% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.33% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.33% fail on Condition
  • 0.33% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.11% fail on Body condition
    • 0.11% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
    • 0.055% fail on Body security
    • 0.055% fail on Doors
      • 0.055% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 0.055% fail on Attachment
  • 0.17% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.17% fail on Registration plate
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages