Renault Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 201785.6% pass rate
from 1,085 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
(61% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 5.0% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Tread depth
-
4.3% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(63% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.37% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.37% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.37% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.37% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.28% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.28% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.092% fail on Individual direction indicators
-
0.28% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.28% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
2.3% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.0% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage ball joints (22 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.092% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.092% fail on Linkage
- 0.092% fail on Ball joint
- 0.092% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.65% fail on
Suspension arms
(180% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover (10 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Springs
-
0.18% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.18% fail on Coil spring
-
0.18% fail on
Coil springs
-
1.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(12 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Visibility
(65% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Wipers (76% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.65% fail on Washers
-
1.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.83% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.092% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.28% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.28% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.74% fail on
Brakes
(64% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.28% fail on Brake discs
-
0.18% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(85% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Brake pads (85% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Brake discs and drums
-
0.28% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt
-
0.092% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.092% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.092% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.092% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.092% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.092% fail on Electronic parking brake
-
0.37% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(75% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Steering
-
0.18% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.18% fail on Track rod end
-
0.092% fail on
Power steering
- 0.092% fail on Other components
-
0.18% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.092% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.092% fail on
Transmission
-
0.092% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.092% fail on Joints
-
0.092% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.092% fail on
Body
- 0.092% fail on Other body component
-
0.092% fail on
Doors
-
0.092% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.092% fail on Door condition
-
0.092% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.092% fail on
Transmission
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Scenic (2016 - 2019)
Practical back row and large boot. Generous level of standard safety technology. Easy to drive.