MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Scenic » 2010

Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.3% pass rate
from 7,841 tests in 2021
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Suspension (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 12% fail on Coil spring (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.089% fail on Mounting (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Linkage
      • 0.24% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (79% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 3.7% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pins and bushes (77% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.089% fail on Ball joint dust cover (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.42% fail on Shock absorbers (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Wheel bearings (44% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.14% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.077% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.026% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.013% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.051% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.026% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.077% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.026% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.8% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.8% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.78% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.051% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 1.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (30% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.52% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (19 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.52% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (23 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical equipment (69% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.077% fail on Horn
      • 0.026% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.089% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.077% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
  • 10% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.9% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.038% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.013% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.013% fail on Other components
        • 0.013% fail on Steering component
    • 0.18% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.089% fail on Steering play
      • 0.089% fail on Steering rack
  • 9.3% fail on Brakes (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs and drums (95% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.013% fail on Cable
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance (25% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.20% fail on Service brake imbalance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.051% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.038% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt (sp) (37% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
        • 0.013% fail on Gradient tester (sp)
      • 0.56% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.54% fail on Rbt
          • 0.51% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.013% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.026% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.013% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.013% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.52% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.41% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.99% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.87% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic braking system (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Electronic stability control (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.46% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Master cylinder (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Valves
    • 0.28% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.28% fail on Electronic parking brake (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.13% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (62% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
    • 0.077% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.077% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.013% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.013% fail on Leaks
    • 0.013% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.013% fail on Other components
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Size/type
  • 5.6% fail on Visibility
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Washers (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.15% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.051% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.026% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.026% fail on Flexible couplings (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.26% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Other passenger's door (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Door condition
        • 0.077% fail on Catch (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.064% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.051% fail on Door condition
        • 0.013% fail on Catch
      • 0.038% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.026% fail on Catch (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Door condition
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.026% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Body
      • 0.064% fail on Other body component
      • 0.051% fail on Panel
    • 0.038% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.038% fail on Undertray
    • 0.013% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.013% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.013% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.013% fail on Hose
    • 0.013% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.013% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.013% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.013% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 3.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.7% fail on Compression ignition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.89% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.064% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.026% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.013% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.013% fail on Other emission control equipment
      • 0.60% fail on Spark ignition (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.52% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (46% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.038% fail on Emissions not tested (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.11% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.013% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.013% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.026% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.026% fail on Undertray
  • 0.73% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.51% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.038% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.038% fail on Attachment
    • 0.22% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Airbags
      • 0.013% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.29% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.28% fail on Attachment
    • 0.013% fail on Condition
  • 0.26% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.26% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages