Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
69.3% pass rate
from 7,467 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (9.2% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.013% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.013% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.013% fail on Matched pair
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Tell tale (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Switch (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.82% fail on Rear lamps (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.76% fail on Front lamps (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.91% fail on Direction indicators (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Flashing type (40% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.28% fail on Individual lamps (66% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.054% fail on Horn (70% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.013% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Suspension (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Front drive shafts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Couplings
      • 0.040% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.040% fail on Drive shafts
    • 3.0% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.0% fail on Condition
      • 0.013% fail on Location
    • 1.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.32% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.080% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment
    • 0.90% fail on Suspension arms (30% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.90% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.28% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.17% fail on Rear
      • 0.11% fail on Front
    • 0.28% fail on Shock absorbers (73% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Condition (73% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.040% fail on Condition
    • 0.013% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.013% fail on Suspension unit
  • 6.1% fail on Brakes
    • 4.7% fail on Hub components (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Brake discs (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Rear wheels (34% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance (57% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Front wheels (54% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.080% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.013% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.013% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.29% fail on Hydraulic systems (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Components (45% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on Pipes (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on Hoses
        • 0.067% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.013% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.067% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.027% fail on Leaks
    • 0.29% fail on ABS
    • 0.21% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.20% fail on Electronic parking brake (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Condition
    • 0.080% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.080% fail on Pedal
        • 0.067% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.013% fail on Condition
    • 0.054% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.013% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.013% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.013% fail on Lever
      • 0.013% fail on Cable
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth (18% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Size/type
  • 4.2% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.94% fail on Washers (48% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.12% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.013% fail on Bonnet
  • 2.9% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.054% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.013% fail on Free play
        • 0.013% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.013% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.013% fail on Steering control
      • 0.013% fail on Steering wheel
  • 0.52% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.32% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.24% fail on Condition
      • 0.054% fail on Requirements
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment
      • 0.013% fail on Installation check
        • 0.013% fail on Belt(s)/padding
    • 0.20% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.20% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.52% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Doors (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Passengers other (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Drivers
      • 0.027% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.15% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Drivers
    • 0.11% fail on Body condition
    • 0.027% fail on Vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Chassis (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.24% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Exhaust system (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.080% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.040% fail on System
      • 0.013% fail on Tank
      • 0.013% fail on Pipe
      • 0.013% fail on Cap
    • 0.054% fail on Emissions (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.027% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.24% fail on Registration plates and VIN (45% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Registration plate (45% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.16% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.12% fail on Attachment
    • 0.027% fail on Condition
    • 0.013% fail on Halfshafts
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages