Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
58.6% pass rate
from 8,550 tests in 2020
(24% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Stop lamp (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.047% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.023% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim (19% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.37% fail on Switch (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.78% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.70% fail on Individual direction indicators (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Position lamps (27% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Position lamp (29% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.012% fail on Switch
    • 1.4% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 1.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (51% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (25 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Horn
      • 0.012% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.012% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.035% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Suspension (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Springs (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Coil springs (83% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.0% fail on Coil spring (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Mounting
    • 4.3% fail on Anti-roll bars (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.81% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (91% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.023% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Anti-roll bar
    • 2.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Ball joint (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pins and bushes (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint dust cover (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.53% fail on Shock absorbers (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.26% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.22% fail on Ball joint (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.012% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.047% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.023% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.012% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.012% fail on Axles
      • 0.012% fail on Swivel joints/housing
    • 0.012% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.012% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.012% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.012% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.2% fail on Brakes (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Mechanical brake components (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (72% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (93% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Brake performance (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance (25% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (25% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.012% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.69% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (48% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Rbt (sp) (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.36% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.094% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.012% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.012% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt (50% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.29% fail on Parking brake performance (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.058% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.42% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.41% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.37% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.035% fail on Electronic stability control (77% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake fluid (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.023% fail on Valves
    • 0.39% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.39% fail on Electronic parking brake (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Pedal
    • 0.070% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.023% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.058% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.023% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.023% fail on Other components
    • 0.012% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.012% fail on Leaks
    • 0.012% fail on Pressure storage reservoirs
      • 0.012% fail on Full power hydraulic systems
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.1% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.012% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.070% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.070% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.058% fail on Steering play
      • 0.058% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition (17% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Size/type
  • 5.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.15% fail on Prop shafts (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Doors
      • 0.12% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.082% fail on Catch (37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Door condition
      • 0.070% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.070% fail on Door condition
      • 0.023% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.023% fail on Door condition
    • 0.15% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.082% fail on Body
      • 0.047% fail on Other body component
      • 0.035% fail on Panel
    • 0.070% fail on Fuel system (66% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on System
      • 0.023% fail on Tank
      • 0.012% fail on Pipe
    • 0.070% fail on Undertray
    • 0.047% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.012% fail on Towbar
      • 0.012% fail on Other towbar components
    • 0.012% fail on Load security
      • 0.012% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.012% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.012% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.012% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 5.1% fail on Visibility
    • 3.6% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (41% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.035% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.035% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.035% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Compression ignition (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.67% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.035% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.63% fail on Spark ignition (58% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.070% fail on Catalyst emissions (89% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.012% fail on Non catalyst emissions
        • 0.012% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.058% fail on Fluid leaks (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Engine oil leaks (84% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.012% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.023% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.012% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.012% fail on Undertray
  • 0.75% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.47% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.41% fail on Condition
      • 0.047% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.012% fail on Attachment
    • 0.28% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.32% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.32% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.27% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.047% fail on Condition
  • 0.023% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.012% fail on Anchorages
    • 0.012% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages