Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2009
57.6% pass rate
from 3,190 tests in 2020
(16% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Position lamp (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on All position lamps (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (27% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.031% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.72% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.91% fail on Reversing lamps (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Reversing lamps (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (19 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (24 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.031% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.063% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 14% fail on Suspension (13% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Springs (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Coil springs (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 7.4% fail on Coil spring (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Mounting
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.60% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.19% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (92% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.60% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.31% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.063% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.063% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.28% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.094% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.063% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.031% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.031% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.031% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.8% fail on Brakes
    • 5.4% fail on Mechanical brake components (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (56% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on Brake pads (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Brake discs and drums (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Brake discs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.031% fail on Cable
        • 0.031% fail on Lever
        • 0.031% fail on Pivot
    • 2.7% fail on Brake performance (29% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.78% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (50% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp) (47% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.56% fail on Rbt
          • 0.50% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.063% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.063% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.063% fail on Parking brake performance (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake control (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Electronic parking brake (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Lever (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.63% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.50% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.44% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.063% fail on Electronic braking system (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.19% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.031% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.16% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.13% fail on Pedal
      • 0.031% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.031% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.3% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.094% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.063% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Steering gear (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Operation
    • 0.34% fail on Steering play (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 6.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Flexible couplings (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.13% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.13% fail on Joints
    • 0.25% fail on Body
      • 0.19% fail on Other body component
      • 0.063% fail on Panel
    • 0.19% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.16% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.094% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.063% fail on Catch (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Hinge
      • 0.031% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.031% fail on Door condition
      • 0.031% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.031% fail on Hinge
    • 0.13% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.094% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.031% fail on Tank
      • 0.031% fail on Hose
      • 0.031% fail on Pipe
    • 0.063% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.031% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.031% fail on Strengthening plate
      • 0.031% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.063% fail on Spare wheel condition (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 6.5% fail on Tyres
    • 4.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 5.8% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.094% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.094% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (32% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (33% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.094% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.094% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.031% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.69% fail on Spark ignition (67% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (57% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Catalyst emissions (78% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.063% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.031% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.031% fail on Other emission control equipment
    • 0.16% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.031% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.031% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.031% fail on Undertray
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.78% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Seat belts (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.63% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.031% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Airbags
      • 0.063% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.31% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.22% fail on Attachment
    • 0.063% fail on Condition
    • 0.031% fail on Hubs
  • 0.25% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.25% fail on Registration plates
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages