MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Scenic » 2009

Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.6% pass rate
from 2,758 tests in 2021
(16% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.073% fail on Mounting
    • 5.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Pins and bushes (54% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover (74% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.44% fail on Shock absorbers (51% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.33% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.22% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.036% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.036% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.11% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.073% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.036% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.036% fail on Axles
      • 0.036% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.036% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.036% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.0% fail on Headlamp (31% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.4% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Switch (45 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.58% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.80% fail on Reversing lamps (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Reversing lamps (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
      • 0.073% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.036% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.036% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.036% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.036% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 10% fail on Brakes (17% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Brake linings and pads (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Brake pads (62% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (70% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Service brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.94% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.11% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.036% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.036% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.036% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.51% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.47% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.073% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.94% fail on Anti-lock braking system (75% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic braking system (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.76% fail on Parking brake control (93% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Electronic parking brake (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Lever
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
    • 0.22% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.22% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.11% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 8.6% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Track rod end (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Drag link end (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Other components (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Steering component
        • 0.036% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.036% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.76% fail on Steering gear (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Operation (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Steering play (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 5.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (23% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Drive shafts (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.2% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.11% fail on Joints
    • 0.22% fail on Exhaust system (89% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.073% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.073% fail on Catch (30 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.036% fail on Door condition
      • 0.036% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.036% fail on Door condition
    • 0.073% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.073% fail on Undertray
    • 0.036% fail on Body
      • 0.036% fail on Other body component
    • 0.036% fail on Seats
      • 0.036% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Wipers
    • 2.0% fail on Washers (33% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.073% fail on Windscreen
      • 0.036% fail on Window
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.036% fail on Driver's view
  • 3.0% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (31% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions (30% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.073% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 0.94% fail on Spark ignition (66% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.11% fail on Catalyst emissions (92% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.036% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.036% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.18% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.036% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.036% fail on Undertray
  • 1.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.73% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.25% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.22% fail on Condition
      • 0.036% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.036% fail on Airbags
      • 0.036% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.22% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.22% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels (70% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Attachment
    • 0.036% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages