Renault Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 200850.5% pass rate
from 6,850 tests in 2017
(34% worse than other 2008 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2008 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
33% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(80% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
22% fail on
Position lamps
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 22% fail on Front lamps (4 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Rear lamps (81% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on All position lamps
- 10% fail on Registration plate lamp (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Switch
-
0.015% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.015% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim (37% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Individual lamps (88% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on All direction indicators (87% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2008 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
(37% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.53% fail on Stop lamp (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Battery
-
0.39% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.39% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.28% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Horn
- 0.18% fail on Rear reflectors (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.015% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.015% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.015% fail on Switch
-
22% fail on
Position lamps
(3 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(31% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Couplings
- 0.015% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.029% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.029% fail on Drive shafts
-
6.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
5.1% fail on
Suspension arms
(100% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (110% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Attachment
-
4.9% fail on
Coil springs
- 4.8% fail on Condition
- 0.044% fail on Location
- 1.9% fail on Front suspension joints (190% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (73% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Linkage condition (75% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
0.73% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.50% fail on Rear
- 0.23% fail on Front
-
0.73% fail on
Shock absorbers
(45% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Condition (45% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.31% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Attachment (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Tie bars/rods
(120% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
0.16% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.16% fail on Condition
-
0.044% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.029% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.029% fail on Condition
-
0.029% fail on
Trailing arms
(88% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (87% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
-
0.015% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.015% fail on Component mounting
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering
(5 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Ball joint (6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Steering arm (16 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.67% fail on
Free play
(13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Steering rack (13 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Drag link end (10 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.16% fail on
Other components
(17 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Steering pivot point (21 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.073% fail on Steering operation
-
0.058% fail on
Power steering
- 0.044% fail on Rams (7 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(6 times worse than other 2008 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Brakes
(22% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Hub components
(52% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Brake pads (60% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.93% fail on Brake discs
- 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
-
3.8% fail on
Brake performance
- 2.6% fail on Rear wheels (53% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.74% fail on Front wheels
- 0.16% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.058% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.015% fail on Brake operation
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake
(140% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Electronic parking brake (24 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Condition (89% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(55% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Components
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Pipes (68% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Hoses
- 0.044% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.058% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.058% fail on Leaks
- 0.015% fail on Operation
-
0.50% fail on
Components
(58% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Restricted movement (92% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Service brake control components
(95% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Pedal
(95% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Anti-slip (130% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Condition
-
0.23% fail on
Pedal
(95% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.23% fail on ABS
-
0.088% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.073% fail on Cable
- 0.015% fail on Lever
- 0.015% fail on Electronic stability system
-
4.6% fail on
Hub components
(52% worse than other 2008 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Tyres
- 5.0% fail on Tread depth (18% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Condition
- 0.15% fail on Size/type
- 0.058% fail on Valve stem
-
5.7% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 2.6% fail on Washers
- 2.4% fail on Wipers (22% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Windscreen
- 0.34% fail on Mirrors (78% worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Bonnet
-
0.82% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(71% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Exhaust system (78% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Emissions (71% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Fuel system
(65% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.029% fail on Pipe
- 0.029% fail on System
- 0.015% fail on Hose
- 0.015% fail on Cap
- 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested (79% better than other 2008 cars)
-
0.76% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.23% fail on Body condition
-
0.22% fail on
Doors
- 0.20% fail on Passengers other
- 0.015% fail on Drivers
-
0.18% fail on
Seats
- 0.13% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Drivers
- 0.058% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.029% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.029% fail on Chassis
-
0.029% fail on
Load security
- 0.029% fail on Access panel
- 0.015% fail on Body security
-
0.74% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.32% fail on Condition
- 0.058% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2008 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Requirements
- 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.35% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.34% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.39% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.41% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.41% fail on Registration plate
-
0.073% fail on
Road Wheels
(82% better than other 2008 cars)
- 0.058% fail on Condition
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Scenic (2003 - 2009)
Far better than the previous model. The Grand model seats seven. Practical and versatile. Excellent crash test rating.