Renault Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 200544.3% pass rate
from 10,433 tests in 2017
(24% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
34% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(43% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 10% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Position lamps
(49% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Front lamps (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.077% fail on All position lamps
- 7.6% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Headlamps
(57% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.067% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
0.029% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.019% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.0096% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.0096% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 0.019% fail on Matched pair
- 0.0096% fail on Switch
- 0.0096% fail on Dipswitch
-
5.2% fail on
Direction indicators
(79% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
(79% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.57% fail on All direction indicators (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Tell tales (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Flashing type
(79% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Battery (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.86% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.79% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.086% fail on Tell tale
- 0.30% fail on Horn (36% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.067% fail on Switch
- 0.019% fail on Tell tale
- 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.019% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
25% fail on
Suspension
(31% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
9.3% fail on
Coil springs
(83% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 9.2% fail on Condition (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Location (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Suspension arms
(60% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Condition
- 0.048% fail on Attachment
-
6.9% fail on
Drive shafts
(93% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(94% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.077% fail on Couplings (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0096% fail on Drive shafts
-
0.086% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.077% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.0096% fail on Universal joint
-
6.8% fail on
Front drive shafts
(94% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(64% better than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (63% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Linkage condition (57% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0096% fail on Condition
-
1.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.3% fail on Condition
-
0.89% fail on
Wheel bearings
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Rear
- 0.20% fail on Front (66% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Macpherson strut
(60% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Condition (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.067% fail on Attachment
- 0.0096% fail on Condition
-
0.24% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.0096% fail on Attachment
-
0.096% fail on
Prescribed areas
(89% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Component mounting (88% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0096% fail on Subframe mounting
-
0.029% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.019% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.019% fail on Condition
-
0.0096% fail on
Fluid suspension
- 0.0096% fail on Suspension unit
-
0.0096% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.0096% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
9.3% fail on
Coil springs
(83% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(29% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
(15% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Rear wheels (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.78% fail on Front wheels (52% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.0096% fail on Brake operation
-
6.2% fail on
Hub components
(79% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Brake pads (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Brake calipers (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0096% fail on Brake linings
-
4.7% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(22% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Components
(27% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Pipes (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Hoses (59% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.0096% fail on Cylinders
- 0.18% fail on Leaks
- 0.048% fail on Operation
- 0.038% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
4.5% fail on
Components
(27% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Parking brake
(98% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Electronic parking brake (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0096% fail on Fitment
- 1.2% fail on ABS (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Restricted movement (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.14% fail on Cable
- 0.048% fail on Lever
- 0.0096% fail on Pivot
-
0.19% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.19% fail on
Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.048% fail on Condition
-
0.19% fail on
Pedal
- 0.019% fail on Electronic stability system (92% better than other 2005 cars)
-
0.019% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
-
0.019% fail on
Components
- 0.019% fail on Pipes
-
0.019% fail on
Components
-
7.8% fail on
Brake performance
(15% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Tyres
(27% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.9% fail on Tread depth (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 0.23% fail on Size/type
- 0.077% fail on Valve stem
- 0.029% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
-
11% fail on
Steering
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Free play
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Other components
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.0096% fail on Intermediate drop arm
- 0.11% fail on Steering operation
-
0.067% fail on
Steering control
- 0.038% fail on Steering lock
- 0.0096% fail on Steering wheel
- 0.0096% fail on Steering column
-
0.0096% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.0096% fail on Universal joint
-
0.019% fail on
Power steering
(95% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Operation (83% better than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering system
(2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
11% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(35% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 5.1% fail on Wipers (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
- 0.14% fail on Bonnet
-
4.7% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (27% better than other 2005 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Emissions
-
0.41% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.26% fail on Cap
- 0.067% fail on System (66% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Tank
- 0.029% fail on Pipe
- 0.0096% fail on Hose
- 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
-
2.8% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(40% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
- 0.019% fail on Passengers airbag
-
0.86% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.56% fail on Condition
- 0.14% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (76% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Requirements
-
0.0096% fail on
Installation check
- 0.0096% fail on Anchorage's
-
2.0% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(40% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.46% fail on Body condition
-
0.40% fail on
Seats
(120% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Passengers (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Drivers
-
0.26% fail on
Doors
(41% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Passengers other
- 0.077% fail on Passengers front
- 0.0096% fail on Drivers
- 0.16% fail on Engine mountings (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.096% fail on Speedometer (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Body security
- 0.019% fail on Spare wheel
-
0.0096% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.0096% fail on Chassis
-
0.0096% fail on
Load security
- 0.0096% fail on Bootlid
-
0.59% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.59% fail on Registration plate
-
0.20% fail on
Road Wheels
(56% better than other 2005 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Condition
- 0.077% fail on Attachment (76% better than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Scenic (2003 - 2009)
Far better than the previous model. The Grand model seats seven. Practical and versatile. Excellent crash test rating.