MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Scenic » 2005

Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2005
44.3% pass rate
from 10,433 tests in 2017
(24% worse than other 2005 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (43% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (70% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Position lamps (49% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Front lamps (58% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.077% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.6% fail on Headlamp aim (19% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Headlamps (57% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Headlamp (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.067% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.029% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.019% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
        • 0.0096% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.0096% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.019% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0096% fail on Switch
      • 0.0096% fail on Dipswitch
    • 5.2% fail on Direction indicators (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Flashing type (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Individual lamps (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on All direction indicators (81% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Side repeaters (81% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.12% fail on Tell tales (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Battery (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.86% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.79% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.086% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.30% fail on Horn (36% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (69% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.086% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.067% fail on Switch
      • 0.019% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.038% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.019% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 25% fail on Suspension (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.3% fail on Coil springs (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Condition (83% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Location (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Suspension arms (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.096% fail on Condition
      • 0.048% fail on Attachment
    • 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Front drive shafts (94% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Constant velocity joints (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.077% fail on Couplings (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.0096% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.086% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.077% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.0096% fail on Universal joint
    • 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (64% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (63% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (69% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage condition (57% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.89% fail on Wheel bearings (40% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Rear
      • 0.20% fail on Front (66% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Macpherson strut (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Condition (60% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.21% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0096% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0096% fail on Attachment
    • 0.096% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.086% fail on Component mounting (88% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.029% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.029% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.019% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.019% fail on Condition
    • 0.0096% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.0096% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.0096% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.0096% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 17% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Brake performance (15% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Rear wheels (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.78% fail on Front wheels (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.26% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.0096% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.2% fail on Hub components (79% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Brake pads (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs (78% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Brake calipers (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Brake linings
    • 4.7% fail on Hydraulic systems (22% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Components (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.2% fail on Pipes (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.33% fail on Hoses (59% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.0096% fail on Cylinders
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
      • 0.048% fail on Operation
      • 0.038% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake (98% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Electronic parking brake (26 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Fitment
    • 1.2% fail on ABS (30% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Restricted movement (86% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.14% fail on Cable
      • 0.048% fail on Lever
      • 0.0096% fail on Pivot
    • 0.19% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.19% fail on Pedal
        • 0.14% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.048% fail on Condition
    • 0.019% fail on Electronic stability system (92% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.019% fail on Components
        • 0.019% fail on Pipes
  • 11% fail on Tyres (27% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Tread depth (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.23% fail on Size/type
    • 0.077% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.029% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
  • 11% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.5% fail on Track rod end (160% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Free play (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Drag link end (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Other components (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Steering pivot point (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.0096% fail on Intermediate drop arm
    • 0.11% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.067% fail on Steering control
      • 0.038% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.0096% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.0096% fail on Steering column
      • 0.0096% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.0096% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.019% fail on Power steering (95% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Operation (83% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road (35% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Wipers (23% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.35% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.7% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system (27% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Emissions
    • 0.41% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.26% fail on Cap
      • 0.067% fail on System (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.048% fail on Tank
      • 0.029% fail on Pipe
      • 0.0096% fail on Hose
    • 0.34% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 2.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (40% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.019% fail on Passengers airbag
    • 0.86% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (76% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0096% fail on Installation check
        • 0.0096% fail on Anchorage's
  • 1.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.46% fail on Body condition
    • 0.40% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Passengers (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Drivers
    • 0.26% fail on Doors (41% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.077% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.0096% fail on Drivers
    • 0.16% fail on Engine mountings (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.096% fail on Speedometer (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.019% fail on Body security
    • 0.019% fail on Spare wheel
    • 0.0096% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.0096% fail on Chassis
    • 0.0096% fail on Load security
      • 0.0096% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.59% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.59% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.20% fail on Road Wheels (56% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Condition
    • 0.077% fail on Attachment (76% better than other 2005 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages