Renault Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 200445.5% pass rate
from 2,098 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 2004 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
24% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(45% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 12% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 7.3% fail on Stop lamp (68% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.2% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (170% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Direction indicators
(39% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
(39% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Individual direction indicators (95% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.14% fail on Side repeaters (86% better than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Flashing type
(39% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.95% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.76% fail on Battery(ies) (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Horn
-
0.29% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Main beam tell-tale (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
-
0.19% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.14% fail on Position lamp
- 0.048% fail on All position lamps
- 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
-
0.048% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.048% fail on Switch
-
12% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(34% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Springs
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (160% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Mounting
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(51% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Ball joint (200% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Pins and bushes (58% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.86% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.048% fail on Suspension arm
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(36% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.71% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.62% fail on Linkage ball joints (62% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Linkage
- 0.14% fail on Ball joint
- 0.048% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.048% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 2.2% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Wheel bearings (52% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.38% fail on Ball joint
- 0.095% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.095% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.38% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.38% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.14% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.095% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.048% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (94% better than other 2004 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.048% fail on Ball joint
-
0.048% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.048% fail on Suspension unit
-
11% fail on
Springs
(160% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(39% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.4% fail on
Brake performance
(25% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (35% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 3.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
(74% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
(75% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (73% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.048% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.095% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.095% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.048% fail on Parking brake performance
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
(75% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.67% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.095% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.71% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.19% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
5.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(73% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(88% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Brake pads (90% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(65% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Brake discs (68% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.19% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.14% fail on Lever
- 0.048% fail on Cable
-
3.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(88% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
3.3% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(120% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Anti-lock braking system (140% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Electronic braking system (13 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Parking brake control
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Electronic parking brake (108 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Lever
-
0.38% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Pedal
- 0.14% fail on Hand lever
- 0.24% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.19% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.19% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.095% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.048% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.048% fail on Valves
-
9.4% fail on
Brake performance
(25% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
12% fail on
Visibility
(58% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Washers (83% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Wipers (32% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
View to rear
- 0.24% fail on Mirrors
- 0.048% fail on Indirect vision devices
- 0.24% fail on Bonnet
-
0.19% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.19% fail on Windscreen
-
11% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(24% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Transmission
(70% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(73% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.6% fail on Joints (75% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.24% fail on Joints
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(73% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.57% fail on
Seats
(170% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.48% fail on
Engine mounting
(4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Bracket
-
0.33% fail on
Doors
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.095% fail on Catch (52 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.14% fail on Door condition
-
0.048% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.048% fail on Door condition
-
0.14% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Bumpers
-
0.14% fail on
Body
- 0.095% fail on Other body component
- 0.048% fail on Panel
-
0.095% fail on
Fuel system
(80% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.095% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.095% fail on Boot lid condition
- 0.095% fail on Undertray
-
0.048% fail on
Chassis
- 0.048% fail on Chassis condition
-
0.048% fail on
Cabs
- 0.048% fail on Prescribed areas
-
5.8% fail on
Transmission
(70% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
9.0% fail on
Steering
(98% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
7.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Track rod end (95% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.76% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Drag link end
- 0.095% fail on Steering arm (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Locking devices
-
1.3% fail on
Steering gear
- 1.3% fail on Steering rack
-
0.95% fail on
Steering play
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.048% fail on Steering column
-
7.0% fail on
Steering linkage components
(110% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Tyres
(42% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Tread depth (74% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Condition
- 0.29% fail on Size/type
-
6.7% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 2.0% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.14% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.095% fail on Catalytic converter
- 0.048% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.048% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.095% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.67% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.19% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.095% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.048% fail on Emissions not tested
-
5.6% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.14% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.095% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.048% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.048% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.048% fail on Undertray
-
6.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.71% fail on
Seat belts
(55% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Condition
- 0.095% fail on Attachment
- 0.048% fail on Requirements
-
0.48% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.43% fail on Registration plates
- 0.048% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.14% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.095% fail on Condition
- 0.048% fail on Attachment
-
0.095% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
(6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.095% fail on Speedometer (6 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.048% fail on
Seat belt installation check
- 0.048% fail on Anchorages
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Scenic (2003 - 2009)
Far better than the previous model. The Grand model seats seven. Practical and versatile. Excellent crash test rating.