Renault Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 200351.4% pass rate
from 1,200 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(20% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(57% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(61% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Service brake performance (80% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
4.7% fail on
Rbt
(61% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.1% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.083% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
2.8% fail on
Parking brake performance
(84% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (85% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
- 0.17% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.083% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.083% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
2.8% fail on
Rbt
(87% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.75% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.67% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.4% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.33% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Service brake performance
(57% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(90% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(79% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Brake pads (80% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(160% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Brake discs (170% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.17% fail on Cable
- 0.083% fail on Lever
- 0.083% fail on Linkage
-
3.2% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(79% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
1.7% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 1.6% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.083% fail on Electronic braking system
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.42% fail on Lever
- 0.42% fail on Electronic parking brake (36 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.42% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.33% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.33% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.17% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.17% fail on Hand lever
- 0.17% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
9.5% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp (36% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.083% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp (37% better than other 2003 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.50% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
2.2% fail on
Hazard warning
(15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Switch (15 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.083% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.083% fail on Side repeaters
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.7% fail on
Electrical equipment
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Battery(ies) (190% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.67% fail on Horn
-
0.50% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp (64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(64% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.17% fail on Position lamp
- 0.083% fail on All position lamps
-
0.083% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
- 0.083% fail on Main beam tell-tale
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamps
(38% better than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Visibility
(67% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.8% fail on Washers (140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Wipers
- 0.17% fail on Bonnet
-
0.17% fail on
View to rear
- 0.17% fail on Mirrors
- 0.083% fail on Driver's view
-
13% fail on
Suspension
(24% better than other 2003 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.5% fail on Ball joint (120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.083% fail on Suspension arm
- 0.083% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
2.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(43% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.25% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints (88% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.083% fail on Anti-roll bar
-
1.8% fail on
Springs
(56% better than other 2003 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
(55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Coil spring (57% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Mounting
-
1.8% fail on
Coil springs
(55% better than other 2003 cars)
- 1.0% fail on Wheel bearings
- 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.67% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.42% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Other suspension component
- 0.083% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.50% fail on
Axles
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Axle (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (9 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.083% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
- 0.42% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.083% fail on Pins and bushes
-
0.17% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.083% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.083% fail on Ball joint
-
6.3% fail on
Suspension arms
-
9.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
6.0% fail on
Transmission
(82% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Joints (77% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Drive shaft
-
0.33% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.25% fail on Joints
- 0.083% fail on Flexible couplings
- 0.083% fail on Belts
-
5.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(77% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.58% fail on
Engine mounting
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Engine mounting condition (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.42% fail on
Doors
-
0.25% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.25% fail on Door condition
-
0.083% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.083% fail on Door condition
-
0.083% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.083% fail on Door condition
-
0.25% fail on
Other passenger's door
-
0.33% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.17% fail on Pipe
- 0.083% fail on Tank
- 0.083% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.25% fail on
Boot lid
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.25% fail on Boot lid condition (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(81% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (81% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.083% fail on Driver's seat
- 0.083% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.083% fail on
Chassis
- 0.083% fail on Chassis condition
- 0.083% fail on Bumpers
-
0.083% fail on
Body
- 0.083% fail on Panel
-
0.083% fail on
Load security
- 0.083% fail on Tailgate
-
6.0% fail on
Transmission
(82% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Tyres
(33% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Condition (63% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Tread depth
- 0.25% fail on Size/type
-
7.2% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 3.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 1.0% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.50% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.25% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.17% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.083% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
6.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.50% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.17% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.17% fail on Other leaks
- 0.083% fail on Transmission oil leaks
- 0.083% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
-
0.17% fail on
Noise suppression
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Sound deadening material (31 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 3.8% fail on Track rod end
- 0.33% fail on Ball joint
-
0.83% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.83% fail on Steering rack
-
0.50% fail on
Power steering
- 0.33% fail on Other components
- 0.17% fail on Pump (7 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.083% fail on Pipes and hoses
-
0.17% fail on
Steering play
- 0.17% fail on Steering rack
- 0.083% fail on Steering wheel
-
4.1% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
1.9% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
- 1.3% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.75% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.58% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.58% fail on Registration plates
-
0.25% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
- 0.083% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Scenic (2003 - 2009)
Far better than the previous model. The Grand model seats seven. Practical and versatile. Excellent crash test rating.