MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Scenic » 2002

Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2002
48.5% pass rate
from 2,749 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (13% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 14% fail on Registration plate lamp (97% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Position lamps (18% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 2.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamp aim (28% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp (34% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Direction indicators (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Flashing type (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on Individual lamps (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.036% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.036% fail on Switch
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps (41% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp (38% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Hazard warning (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.65% fail on Lamp (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.2% fail on Battery
    • 0.95% fail on Horn
    • 0.84% fail on Rear fog lamp (45% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.84% fail on Fog lamp (44% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.073% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.036% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 20% fail on Suspension
    • 8.5% fail on Drive shafts (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Front drive shafts (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 8.4% fail on Constant velocity joints (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.036% fail on Couplings
      • 0.073% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.073% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
    • 3.2% fail on Front suspension joints (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (54% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (77% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Condition
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage condition (76% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.80% fail on Rear
      • 0.69% fail on Front
    • 1.3% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.69% fail on Coil springs (83% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition (85% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Location
    • 0.25% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.25% fail on Condition
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Component mounting (91% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.15% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.073% fail on Attachment
      • 0.036% fail on Condition
    • 0.073% fail on Torsion bars (9 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Condition (22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.073% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.073% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.073% fail on Panhard rods (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Condition (30 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.036% fail on General condition
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 8.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.3% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance (40% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.58% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.11% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.5% fail on Hub components (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Brake pads (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (97% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.036% fail on Brake linings
    • 4.8% fail on Hydraulic systems (24% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Components (25% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Pipes
        • 1.2% fail on Hoses
        • 0.22% fail on Reservoirs
        • 0.036% fail on Servos
      • 0.44% fail on Leaks
      • 0.036% fail on Operation
    • 0.80% fail on ABS
    • 0.58% fail on Restricted movement (94% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Parking brake (47% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Air and vacuum systems (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Components (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Servos (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Leaks (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.11% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Cable
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
        • 0.073% fail on Condition
        • 0.073% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.036% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.036% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
  • 14% fail on Driver's view of the road (48% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Washers (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Wipers (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.29% fail on Bonnet
  • 11% fail on Tyres (20% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 5.1% fail on Condition (32% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
    • 0.036% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.036% fail on Valve stem
  • 7.2% fail on Steering (45% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Steering system (44% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 5.4% fail on Track rod end (81% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack (53% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Free play
        • 0.073% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.073% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.036% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.87% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.36% fail on Pipes and hoses (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Pump (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Other components
    • 0.073% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.036% fail on Steering control
      • 0.036% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.036% fail on Universal joint
  • 5.4% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (32% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Emissions
    • 2.1% fail on Exhaust system (53% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.58% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system (78% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Cap
      • 0.073% fail on System
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.95% fail on Doors
      • 0.80% fail on Passengers other (98% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Drivers
      • 0.036% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.40% fail on Body condition (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Engine mountings (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Load security (6 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Tailgate (15 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Chassis (67% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Seats
      • 0.11% fail on Passengers
      • 0.073% fail on Drivers
  • 1.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.91% fail on Seat belts (64% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment
      • 0.036% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.51% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.47% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (70% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.036% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.3% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.3% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.25% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.073% fail on Attachment
  • 0.073% fail on Towbars
    • 0.073% fail on Towbar (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)

Search Good Garages