Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2000
54.7% pass rate
from 329 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.0% fail on Hazard warning (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Switch (17 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.7% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.30% fail on All direction indicators
    • 2.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.30% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.2% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.91% fail on Horn
      • 0.30% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.30% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
  • 15% fail on Visibility (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.30% fail on Bonnet
  • 15% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 7.9% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.3% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.61% fail on Joints
    • 6.1% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.2% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.2% fail on Body
      • 1.2% fail on Other body component (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.30% fail on Hose
      • 0.30% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
    • 0.61% fail on Doors
      • 0.61% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.30% fail on Door condition
        • 0.30% fail on Pillar
    • 0.30% fail on Chassis
      • 0.30% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.30% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.30% fail on Towbar
      • 0.30% fail on Towbar condition
    • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.30% fail on Engine mounting condition
  • 13% fail on Suspension
    • 6.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.1% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.3% fail on Springs
      • 3.3% fail on Coil springs
        • 3.3% fail on Coil spring
        • 0.30% fail on Mounting
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.91% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 1.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.91% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.91% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.30% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.61% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (87% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 12% fail on Brakes
    • 7.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.6% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 2.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.7% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt
          • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.30% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.30% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.91% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.61% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.9% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.91% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.91% fail on Lever (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Pedal
    • 0.30% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.30% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.30% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.30% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.30% fail on Anti-lock braking system
  • 9.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 6.4% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 2.1% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.30% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.61% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.30% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.30% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 0.30% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.30% fail on Transmission oil leaks
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.1% fail on Condition
  • 4.3% fail on Steering
    • 3.3% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.3% fail on Track rod end
    • 0.61% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.61% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.30% fail on Steering play
      • 0.30% fail on Steering rack
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.5% fail on Condition
    • 1.5% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.91% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.91% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages