Renault Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2000
47.5% pass rate
from 551 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.4% fail on Front lamps
      • 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 4.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.6% fail on Individual lamps (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
    • 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Hazard warning (12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Lamp (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamps (66% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Tell tale
    • 0.91% fail on Horn
    • 0.36% fail on Battery
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 21% fail on Suspension
    • 7.8% fail on Drive shafts (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Front drive shafts (80% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 3.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
    • 3.1% fail on Coil springs
      • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Rear
      • 0.91% fail on Front
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.18% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.18% fail on Attachment
    • 0.18% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 17% fail on Driver's view of the road (78% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 10% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.36% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 7.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.8% fail on Front wheels
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
    • 5.8% fail on Hub components (95% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Brake discs (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.0% fail on Components
        • 2.7% fail on Pipes
        • 0.73% fail on Hoses
        • 0.73% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Servos
      • 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Operation
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
    • 0.91% fail on ABS
    • 0.54% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.54% fail on Cable
    • 0.36% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.36% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
  • 13% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Emissions
    • 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.36% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.18% fail on Pipe
      • 0.18% fail on Cap
  • 7.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.36% fail on Size/type
    • 0.18% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 4.9% fail on Steering system
      • 3.4% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.73% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.54% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.18% fail on Free play
        • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.73% fail on Power steering
      • 0.36% fail on Operation
      • 0.36% fail on Other components
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.1% fail on Body condition
    • 0.54% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.18% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.36% fail on Load security (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Bootlid
      • 0.18% fail on Tailgate
    • 0.18% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.18% fail on Chassis
  • 2.4% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (53% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Seat belts (63% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Condition
      • 0.36% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.91% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages