Renault Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 200047.5% pass rate
from 551 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
28% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 8.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.4% fail on Front lamps
- 3.1% fail on Rear lamps
- 5.8% fail on Headlamp aim
-
4.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.6% fail on Individual lamps (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.18% fail on All direction indicators
-
4.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 4.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Hazard warning
(12 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Switch (14 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Lamp (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (65% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.3% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale
- 0.91% fail on Horn
- 0.36% fail on Battery
- 0.18% fail on Electrical wiring
-
21% fail on
Suspension
-
7.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.18% fail on Drive shafts
-
7.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Suspension arms
- 4.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
3.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (62% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
- 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
-
3.1% fail on
Coil springs
- 3.1% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.1% fail on Rear
- 0.91% fail on Front
- 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.6% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.6% fail on Condition
-
0.36% fail on
Trailing arms
- 0.36% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.18% fail on
Torsion bars
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Bonded suspension
- 0.18% fail on Attachment
-
0.18% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.18% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.18% fail on Subframe mounting
-
7.8% fail on
Drive shafts
(80% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
17% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(78% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 10% fail on Washers (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.1% fail on Mirrors
- 0.36% fail on Bonnet
- 0.18% fail on Windscreen
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
- 4.2% fail on Rear wheels
- 3.8% fail on Front wheels
- 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.8% fail on
Hub components
(95% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Brake pads (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.2% fail on Brake discs (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
4.0% fail on
Components
- 2.7% fail on Pipes
- 0.73% fail on Hoses
- 0.73% fail on Reservoirs (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Servos
- 0.18% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Leaks
-
4.0% fail on
Components
- 0.91% fail on ABS
-
0.54% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.54% fail on Cable
-
0.36% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.36% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
-
7.3% fail on
Brake performance
-
13% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.7% fail on Exhaust system (67% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.4% fail on Emissions
- 1.1% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.36% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.18% fail on Pipe
- 0.18% fail on Cap
-
7.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.2% fail on Tread depth
- 3.1% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Size/type
- 0.18% fail on Valve stem
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
- 3.4% fail on Track rod end
- 0.73% fail on Steering rack
- 0.54% fail on Ball joint
-
0.18% fail on
Free play
- 0.18% fail on Steering rack
-
0.73% fail on
Power steering
- 0.36% fail on Operation
- 0.36% fail on Other components
-
4.9% fail on
Steering system
-
2.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.1% fail on Body condition
- 0.54% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.36% fail on
Doors
- 0.18% fail on Drivers
- 0.18% fail on Passengers other
-
0.36% fail on
Load security
(7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Bootlid
- 0.18% fail on Tailgate
-
0.18% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.18% fail on Chassis
-
2.4% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(53% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.73% fail on Condition
- 0.36% fail on Attachment (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Prescribed areas
-
1.1% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.91% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.18% fail on Drivers airbag
-
1.3% fail on
Seat belts
(63% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.8% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.8% fail on Registration plate