Renault Modus MOT Results

Registered in 2010
68.4% pass rate
from 1,619 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Modus is unusually good or bad.

  • 13% fail on Suspension (58% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Location
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.31% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.99% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.99% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.99% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.43% fail on Sub-frames (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Condition (82 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Prescribed areas (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Component mounting (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Subframe mounting (87 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.19% fail on Shock absorbers (83% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Condition (83% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.12% fail on Rear
    • 0.062% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.062% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.062% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.062% fail on Condition
  • 12% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 3.7% fail on Stop lamp (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Front lamps
    • 2.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (42% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.99% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.43% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.062% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.062% fail on Switch
    • 0.19% fail on Horn
    • 0.12% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.12% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.062% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.062% fail on Size/type
    • 0.062% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.3% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Steering system (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.062% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.062% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.062% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.062% fail on Steering operation
  • 4.1% fail on Brakes (27% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.4% fail on Brake pads (40% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Brake performance (43% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.68% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.37% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.062% fail on Brake imbalance
    • 0.56% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.56% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.31% fail on Pedal
        • 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.062% fail on Condition
    • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.12% fail on Components
        • 0.062% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.062% fail on Pipes
    • 0.12% fail on ABS
    • 0.062% fail on Restricted movement
  • 2.8% fail on Driver's view of the road (40% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
    • 1.1% fail on Wipers (60% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.31% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 2.0% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.062% fail on Requirements
    • 0.25% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.19% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.062% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.31% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (78% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Emissions
    • 0.062% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.062% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 0.31% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.31% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.19% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.062% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.062% fail on Chassis
    • 0.062% fail on Body condition
    • 0.062% fail on Doors
      • 0.062% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.062% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.062% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

  • Renault Modus (2004 - 2012)
    Sensible, practical little car with good features like 'Triptic' rear seat and some diesel engines under 121g/km. Plenty of character too.

    Search Good Garages