MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Megane » 2010

Renault Megane MOT Results

Registered in 2010
50.0% pass rate
from 19,952 tests in 2021
(41% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Megane is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Springs (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 14% fail on Coil springs (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 14% fail on Coil spring (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Mounting (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0050% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 7.0% fail on Anti-roll bars (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (76% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.090% fail on Linkage (64% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.0050% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.9% fail on Suspension arms (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Pins and bushes (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.77% fail on Wheel bearings (39% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Macpherson strut (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Pins and bushes (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.075% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.27% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.025% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.010% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.0050% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.040% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.035% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0050% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.025% fail on Sub-frames (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0050% fail on Sub-frame
    • 0.025% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (74% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Axles (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (86% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (49% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Stop lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Headlamp levelling device (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.010% fail on Dipswitch
      • 0.0050% fail on Matched pair
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp aim (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.5% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rear fog lamp (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0050% fail on Switch
      • 0.0050% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.0050% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (38% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (38% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.47% fail on Individual direction indicators (63% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on All direction indicators (71% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Rear reflectors (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.27% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.010% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.16% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.15% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.010% fail on All position lamps
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Horn
      • 0.030% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.015% fail on Battery(ies) (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.070% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.010% fail on Hazard warning (80% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Switch (80% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 13% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Brake performance (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Rbt (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 3.0% fail on Service brake performance (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.39% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.0050% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.020% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
          • 0.0050% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.010% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.010% fail on Service brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Decelerometer (sp) (78% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.050% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.030% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.015% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.79% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Rbt (sp) (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.50% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance (92% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.0050% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0050% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.0050% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (97% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (26% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.035% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.37% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Cable (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.090% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Linkage
        • 0.015% fail on Pivot (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0050% fail on Relay lever
    • 1.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (38% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Anti-lock braking system (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.070% fail on Electronic stability control (67% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Electronic braking system
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Brake fluid (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.020% fail on Valves
      • 0.0050% fail on Servos
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (39% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Pedal
      • 0.085% fail on Hand lever (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Parking brake control (55% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Lever (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Electronic parking brake (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.12% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
      • 0.015% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.050% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.0050% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.0050% fail on Leaks
    • 0.0050% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0050% fail on Other components
  • 13% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 13% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.055% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
        • 0.015% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.015% fail on Locking devices
      • 0.0050% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.24% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.24% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.0050% fail on Operation
    • 0.095% fail on Steering play
      • 0.095% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.010% fail on Steering lock (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0050% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 6.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Transmission (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.7% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Flexible couplings (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.0050% fail on Bearing housing
      • 0.19% fail on Prop shafts (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Joints (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Exhaust system (87% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Doors
      • 0.075% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.050% fail on Door condition
        • 0.025% fail on Catch (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.045% fail on Door condition
      • 0.035% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.030% fail on Door condition
        • 0.0050% fail on Catch
    • 0.15% fail on Body (69% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
      • 0.045% fail on Panel (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0050% fail on Body condition
    • 0.12% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.090% fail on Seats
      • 0.050% fail on Driver's seat
      • 0.040% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.060% fail on Fuel system (72% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Tank
      • 0.010% fail on Pipe
      • 0.010% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (93% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.040% fail on Undertray
    • 0.020% fail on Chassis
      • 0.015% fail on Chassis condition
      • 0.0050% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.015% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.015% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.010% fail on Towbar
      • 0.010% fail on Towbar condition (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0050% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0050% fail on Carrier
    • 0.0050% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.0050% fail on Bracket
    • 0.0050% fail on Load security
      • 0.0050% fail on Access panel
    • 0.0050% fail on Floor
    • 0.0050% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres (10% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Condition (13% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Size/type (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.7% fail on Visibility
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (28% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Washers (21% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on View to rear
      • 0.17% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.015% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen (87% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.020% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (19% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (18% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.085% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.030% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.015% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.0050% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.0050% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.77% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (20% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Catalyst emissions (76% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.085% fail on Emissions not tested (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.010% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.010% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.0050% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.12% fail on Fluid leaks (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0050% fail on Transmission oil leaks
    • 0.020% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.015% fail on Undertray
      • 0.0050% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
      • 0.050% fail on Requirements (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.025% fail on Attachment
    • 0.035% fail on Airbags
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.0050% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 0.73% fail on Road Wheels (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Attachment (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Condition
  • 0.42% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.0050% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.0050% fail on Speedometer
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages