Renault Megane Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2005
41.6% pass rate
from 305 tests in 2017
(30% worse than other 2005 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Megane Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 38% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (61% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Registration plate lamp (85% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Position lamps (59% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.9% fail on Front lamps (77% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Rear lamps
    • 8.5% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 5.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.66% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (46 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Direction indicators (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.6% fail on Flashing type (92% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Individual lamps (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.33% fail on Tell tales
    • 3.6% fail on Battery (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.98% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.98% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.66% fail on Horn
    • 0.33% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.33% fail on Switch
  • 31% fail on Suspension (63% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 14% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 14% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Suspension arms (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
    • 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (93% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.6% fail on Front drive shafts (87% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (89% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.33% fail on Drive shafts
    • 2.3% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.3% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Macpherson strut (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.3% fail on Rear
    • 0.66% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.66% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 22% fail on Brakes (62% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 5.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.66% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.33% fail on Front wheels
    • 7.2% fail on Hub components (110% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.9% fail on Brake pads (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Brake discs
    • 4.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 4.6% fail on Components
        • 3.9% fail on Pipes
        • 0.33% fail on Hoses
        • 0.33% fail on Reservoirs
    • 2.3% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.6% fail on Electronic parking brake (28 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on ABS
    • 1.3% fail on Restricted movement (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.66% fail on Cable
  • 11% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 8.5% fail on Wipers (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 0.66% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.66% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.33% fail on Bonnet
  • 9.8% fail on Tyres
    • 6.2% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.66% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Size/type
  • 7.9% fail on Steering (96% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Steering system (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Track rod end (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.3% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.66% fail on Steering operation (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 4.6% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 2.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.3% fail on Emissions
    • 0.66% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.33% fail on Cap
      • 0.33% fail on System
    • 0.33% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 3.3% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 3.0% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 3.0% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
    • 0.98% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.66% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Requirements
      • 0.33% fail on Attachment
  • 2.3% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.98% fail on Body condition
    • 0.66% fail on Engine mountings (11 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Seats
      • 0.66% fail on Passengers (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 0.98% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.98% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages