MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Laguna » 2010

Renault Laguna MOT Results

Registered in 2010
54.8% pass rate
from 2,272 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Laguna is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 17% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 17% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 17% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.1% fail on Anti-roll bars (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Linkage ball joints (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.70% fail on Ball joint (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.088% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.044% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.8% fail on Pins and bushes (67% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.044% fail on Suspension arm
    • 1.9% fail on Shock absorbers (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.57% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.088% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.044% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.044% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.044% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.044% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.044% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 13% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps (32% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.35% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.2% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.92% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.13% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.31% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.26% fail on Horn
      • 0.044% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.22% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.044% fail on Switch
    • 0.088% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.088% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.088% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.088% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Brakes (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.8% fail on Parking brake performance (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.044% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.26% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.22% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.22% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.044% fail on Service brake performance
    • 4.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Brake pads (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs and drums (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.044% fail on Cable
        • 0.044% fail on Lever
    • 1.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (77% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.66% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.26% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.088% fail on Electronic braking system
      • 0.088% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.22% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.22% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.088% fail on Pedal
    • 0.044% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.044% fail on Leaks
    • 0.044% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.044% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.044% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 7.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.088% fail on Joints
    • 0.31% fail on Exhaust system (82% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Doors
      • 0.18% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.18% fail on Door condition
      • 0.044% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.044% fail on Door condition
    • 0.18% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.088% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.044% fail on Tank
      • 0.044% fail on Pipe
    • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.13% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.088% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.044% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.088% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.044% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.044% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.044% fail on Chassis
      • 0.044% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.044% fail on Body
      • 0.044% fail on Other body component
    • 0.044% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.044% fail on Other boot lid component
    • 0.044% fail on Undertray
  • 6.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.4% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 0.31% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Visibility
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 0.97% fail on Wipers (62% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Bonnet (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.18% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on View to rear
      • 0.13% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (50% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Exhaust emissions (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.62% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.35% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.088% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.044% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.62% fail on Spark ignition (70% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.57% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.044% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.088% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.088% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 0.97% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.62% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.35% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.18% fail on Condition
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.044% fail on Requirements
  • 0.92% fail on Steering (61% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.35% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.22% fail on Steering linkage components (89% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Track rod end (93% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.22% fail on Power steering
      • 0.18% fail on Operation (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Pump
      • 0.044% fail on Other components
    • 0.088% fail on Steering play
      • 0.088% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.044% fail on Steering column
    • 0.044% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.35% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.35% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.22% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.18% fail on Condition
    • 0.044% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages