Renault Laguna MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.2% pass rate
from 2,368 tests in 2017
(40% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Laguna is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 14% fail on Coil springs (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 14% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Location (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Drive shafts (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Front drive shafts (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 6.9% fail on Constant velocity joints (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (57% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.042% fail on Condition
      • 0.042% fail on Attachment
    • 2.1% fail on Shock absorbers (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Condition (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.72% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.25% fail on Front
      • 0.25% fail on Rear
    • 0.21% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.042% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.042% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 20% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Position lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.5% fail on Front lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.042% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.1% fail on Registration plate lamp (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.59% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.59% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.084% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.042% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.55% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.55% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.042% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.34% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.34% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.21% fail on Tell tale (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.042% fail on Horn
    • 0.042% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 8.2% fail on Brakes (46% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.2% fail on Brake pads (78% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake calipers (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.6% fail on Rear wheels (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.42% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.30% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.084% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.084% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.68% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.38% fail on Leaks (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Components
        • 0.17% fail on Pipes
        • 0.042% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.042% fail on Hoses
      • 0.042% fail on Operation
    • 0.42% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.30% fail on Electronic parking brake (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.042% fail on Fitment
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.084% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.084% fail on Pedal
        • 0.042% fail on Condition
        • 0.042% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.084% fail on ABS
    • 0.042% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 6.3% fail on Tyres
    • 3.5% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.42% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 3.5% fail on Driver's view of the road (26% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.13% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.084% fail on Mirrors
  • 0.76% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.42% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.34% fail on Condition
      • 0.084% fail on Requirements
    • 0.34% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.34% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.63% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.63% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.42% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.17% fail on Doors
      • 0.084% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.042% fail on Drivers
      • 0.042% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.13% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Drivers
    • 0.042% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.042% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.042% fail on Chassis
    • 0.042% fail on Body condition
  • 0.25% fail on Steering (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Steering system (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Free play
        • 0.042% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.042% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.042% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.042% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.042% fail on Power steering
      • 0.042% fail on Operation
    • 0.042% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 0.21% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Condition
    • 0.042% fail on Attachment
  • 0.21% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.084% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.042% fail on Pipe
      • 0.042% fail on Cap
    • 0.084% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.042% fail on Exhaust system
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages