MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Laguna » 2009

Renault Laguna MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.5% pass rate
from 1,750 tests in 2021
(17% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Laguna is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (54% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 16% fail on Springs (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 16% fail on Coil springs (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 16% fail on Coil spring (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (44% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.86% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.23% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage
      • 0.057% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 1.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.057% fail on Suspension arm
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.86% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.57% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.057% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.057% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.057% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.057% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.057% fail on Ball joint
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.4% fail on Headlamps (36% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.57% fail on Headlamp levelling device (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.34% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.69% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.69% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.63% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.63% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.57% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.51% fail on Horn (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.11% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.11% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.057% fail on Switch
    • 0.057% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Brakes (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Brake performance (39% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 2.6% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.63% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.17% fail on Plate brake tester (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.17% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Parking brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.1% fail on Rbt (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.057% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.057% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.40% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.23% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 4.7% fail on Mechanical brake components (57% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Brake linings and pads (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Brake pads (83% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.17% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Cable
    • 3.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.97% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.17% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.11% fail on Electronic braking system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.46% fail on Electronic parking brake (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Lever
    • 0.34% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.34% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.17% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.057% fail on Pedal
    • 0.11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.11% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.057% fail on Flexible brake hoses
  • 8.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Transmission (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 7.5% fail on Joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.17% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.17% fail on Joints
    • 0.29% fail on Seats
      • 0.23% fail on Driver's seat (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.23% fail on Doors
      • 0.11% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.11% fail on Door condition
      • 0.057% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.057% fail on Door condition
      • 0.057% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.057% fail on Door condition
    • 0.11% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Chassis
      • 0.057% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.057% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.057% fail on Tank
    • 0.057% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.057% fail on Body
      • 0.057% fail on Other body component
    • 0.057% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.057% fail on Boot lid condition
    • 0.057% fail on Undertray
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.1% fail on Washers
    • 2.0% fail on Wipers
    • 0.46% fail on Bonnet (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.17% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.057% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.4% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.6% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Size/type
  • 2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (45% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions (42% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.11% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.057% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.057% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.057% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.057% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.80% fail on Spark ignition (71% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.74% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.057% fail on Catalyst emissions
        • 0.057% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 1.1% fail on Steering (54% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.74% fail on Steering gear (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.74% fail on Steering rack (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Steering linkage components (91% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Track rod end (94% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.17% fail on Electronic power steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.057% fail on Steering lock
  • 0.51% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.51% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (63% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.057% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.057% fail on Condition
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages