Renault Laguna MOT Results
Registered in 200350.7% pass rate
from 685 tests in 2021
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Laguna is unusually good or bad.
-
23% fail on
Suspension
(35% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Springs
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
9.5% fail on
Coil springs
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.3% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.7% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.44% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
3.5% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.3% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 1.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint
- 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
2.0% fail on
Axles
(11 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Swivel pins and bushes (17 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pins and bushes (28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.88% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.58% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.29% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.29% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (89% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
0.15% fail on
Air/gas/fluid suspension
- 0.15% fail on Suspension unit
-
9.5% fail on
Springs
(140% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
9.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 5.3% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
3.4% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
- 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.73% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
(90% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
(99% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
2.9% fail on
Rbt
(99% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.58% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.44% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(74% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(74% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.44% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(74% better than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 4.8% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
4.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
2.5% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(120% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 2.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (110% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake control
- 1.0% fail on Lever
-
0.44% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.44% fail on Hand lever
-
0.15% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.15% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.15% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
0.15% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.15% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
- 0.15% fail on Load sensing valves
-
9.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
14% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp
- 1.0% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
4.1% fail on
Hazard warning
(29 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Switch (29 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.29% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.8% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.73% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.73% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.29% fail on All direction indicators
-
1.8% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.44% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.44% fail on Position lamp
- 0.29% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (88% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.29% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.29% fail on Horn
-
0.15% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.15% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.15% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.15% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.4% fail on
Headlamps
-
9.1% fail on
Visibility
- 6.1% fail on Wipers
- 2.3% fail on Washers
-
0.58% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.58% fail on Windscreen (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Bonnet
-
8.8% fail on
Steering
(97% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Track rod end (150% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Ball joint
-
1.0% fail on
Power steering
(180% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.29% fail on Operation
- 0.29% fail on Other components
-
0.29% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
-
0.29% fail on
Steering play
- 0.29% fail on Steering rack
-
7.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
(130% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
(63% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Joints (69% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.15% fail on Joints
-
5.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(67% worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.88% fail on Exhaust system (74% better than other 2003 cars)
-
0.73% fail on
Doors
-
0.29% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.15% fail on Door condition
- 0.15% fail on Hinge
-
0.29% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.29% fail on Door condition
-
0.29% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.29% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 0.29% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
-
0.29% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.29% fail on Tank
- 0.15% fail on Bumpers
-
0.15% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.15% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.15% fail on
Seats
- 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
-
0.15% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.15% fail on Boot lid condition
-
5.4% fail on
Transmission
(63% worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.0% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.7% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.9% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (65% better than other 2003 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.2% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.58% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
- 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.15% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
-
4.7% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.15% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.15% fail on Engine oil leaks
-
5.8% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
5.5% fail on
Tyres
- 3.2% fail on Tread depth
- 2.5% fail on Condition
- 0.44% fail on Size/type
-
1.6% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.73% fail on Condition
- 0.58% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.29% fail on
Airbags
- 0.29% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.73% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.88% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.88% fail on Registration plates
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Attachment