Renault Laguna MOT Results

Registered in 2000
43.2% pass rate
from 1,198 tests in 2017
(15% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Laguna is unusually good or bad.

  • 30% fail on Suspension (40% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Drive shafts (83% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Front drive shafts (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 7.8% fail on Constant velocity joints (86% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.083% fail on Drive shafts
    • 7.2% fail on Anti-roll bars (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.083% fail on Condition
    • 6.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 4.0% fail on Component mounting
      • 2.8% fail on Subframe mounting (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.0% fail on Coil springs (94% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Condition (89% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Wheel bearings (130% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Front (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 1.8% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.92% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.50% fail on Condition
      • 0.33% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.42% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.42% fail on Condition
    • 0.17% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.17% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.083% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.083% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.083% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.083% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 29% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (17% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim (87% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Headlamps (85% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.9% fail on Headlamp (90% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.083% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 4.6% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 4.5% fail on Position lamps (31% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.1% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.67% fail on Rear lamps (65% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.3% fail on Horn (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Direction indicators (54% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Flashing type (54% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.25% fail on Side repeaters
    • 1.1% fail on Battery
    • 0.92% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.92% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.33% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.25% fail on Switch
      • 0.083% fail on Lamp
    • 0.17% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 18% fail on Brakes
    • 9.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.7% fail on Front wheels (45% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake performance (41% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.33% fail on Service brake performance (71% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 7.8% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 7.3% fail on Components
        • 6.4% fail on Pipes (55% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Hoses
        • 0.083% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.75% fail on Leaks
      • 0.083% fail on Operation
    • 3.1% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Brake pads (50% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.083% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.083% fail on Brake calipers
    • 2.9% fail on Parking brake (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Condition (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.42% fail on ABS (70% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.25% fail on Pedal
        • 0.25% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.17% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.083% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.083% fail on Cable
  • 14% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (26% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Exhaust system (75% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Emissions
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Tank (13 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Cap
      • 0.25% fail on System
      • 0.083% fail on Pipe
    • 1.6% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 13% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.75% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.083% fail on Free play
        • 0.083% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.083% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.4% fail on Power steering (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pipes and hoses (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Operation
      • 0.17% fail on Other components
      • 0.083% fail on Pump
    • 0.33% fail on Steering operation (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 12% fail on Driver's view of the road (28% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Wipers (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Bonnet (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.67% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.25% fail on Windscreen
  • 9.5% fail on Tyres
    • 6.5% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on Size/type (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 5.0% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.3% fail on Body condition
    • 1.1% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Chassis
    • 1.1% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Drivers (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.083% fail on Passengers
    • 0.92% fail on Doors
      • 0.33% fail on Drivers
      • 0.33% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.25% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.75% fail on Engine mountings (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Load security
      • 0.17% fail on Bootlid (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.083% fail on Body security
  • 4.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.7% fail on Seat belts
      • 3.8% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.75% fail on Condition
      • 0.17% fail on Requirements
    • 0.17% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (90% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (89% better than other 2000 cars)
  • 1.7% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.17% fail on Towbars
    • 0.17% fail on Vehicle structure
  • 0.17% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages