Renault Koleos MOT Results

Registered in 2009
61.1% pass rate
from 1,452 tests in 2017
(19% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Koleos is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.2% fail on Front lamps (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Rear lamps (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.8% fail on Registration plate lamp (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.069% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.069% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 0.90% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.90% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.21% fail on Battery
    • 0.21% fail on Trailer electrical socket (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Horn
    • 0.14% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.069% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.069% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.069% fail on Lamp
      • 0.069% fail on Switch
    • 0.069% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Suspension (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Anti-roll bars (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.34% fail on Attachment (17 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Condition (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 2.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.21% fail on Attachment (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.62% fail on Sub-frames (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Condition (37 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Drive shafts
      • 0.55% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 0.55% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 0.21% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.21% fail on Front
    • 0.14% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.14% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.14% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Condition (88% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.069% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.069% fail on Coil springs
      • 0.069% fail on Location
    • 0.069% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.069% fail on Condition
  • 7.7% fail on Brakes
    • 5.3% fail on Hub components (89% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Components (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Pipes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Hoses
      • 0.069% fail on Leaks
    • 1.6% fail on Brake performance (45% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.69% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.55% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.48% fail on Rear wheels (67% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.14% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.14% fail on Electronic parking brake
    • 0.069% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.069% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.069% fail on Pedal
        • 0.069% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.069% fail on Restricted movement
  • 6.4% fail on Tyres
    • 4.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.3% fail on Condition (35% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Valve stem
    • 0.069% fail on Size/type
  • 6.1% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.3% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Windscreen (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
  • 2.0% fail on Steering (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Steering system (81% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.069% fail on Power steering
      • 0.069% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 0.76% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.69% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.14% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.069% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.069% fail on System
  • 0.28% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.28% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.28% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.21% fail on Registration plate
    • 0.069% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.14% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.14% fail on Doors
      • 0.069% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.069% fail on Passengers other
  • 0.069% fail on Towbars
    • 0.069% fail on Towbar
  • 0.069% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.069% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

  • Renault Koleos (2008 - 2010)
    Friendly looking and vary capable SUV that combines features of a good SUV with benefits of a decent MPV. Smooth revving chain cam diesel. Good ride.

    Search Good Garages