MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Kadjar » 2016

Renault Kadjar MOT Results

Registered in 2016
81.2% pass rate
from 19,354 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Kadjar is unusually good or bad.

  • 5.8% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (65% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.0052% fail on Dipswitch
    • 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim (23% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.41% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (5 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.26% fail on Stop lamp (59% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.22% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.088% fail on Direction indicators (76% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Flashing type (76% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.072% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.016% fail on Individual direction indicators (81% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.036% fail on Horn
      • 0.021% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.010% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0052% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.031% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.016% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.016% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.016% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.010% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.010% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 5.4% fail on Visibility (36% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.84% fail on Washers (25% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.047% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.026% fail on View to rear
      • 0.026% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.010% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.7% fail on Tyres (20% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth (62% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Condition (18% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Size/type
  • 3.6% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Mechanical brake components (59% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (67% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake pads (66% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.69% fail on Brake discs and drums (44% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.69% fail on Brake discs (44% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Brake performance (26% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Service brake performance (29% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.29% fail on Rbt
          • 0.22% fail on Service brake performance (33% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.078% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.16% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.052% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.052% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.052% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.026% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.036% fail on Parking brake performance (63% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.031% fail on Rbt (67% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.026% fail on Parking brake performance (68% better than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0052% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0052% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0052% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
    • 0.12% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.062% fail on Electronic braking system (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.052% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.016% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.093% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.088% fail on Electronic parking brake (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Lever
    • 0.041% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.021% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.010% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.010% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.010% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (88% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.010% fail on Pedal
    • 0.010% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.010% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.0052% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.0052% fail on Additional braking device
  • 0.99% fail on Suspension (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.34% fail on Suspension arms (31% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.098% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.098% fail on Ball joint dust cover (85% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.25% fail on Springs (78% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Coil springs (78% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.25% fail on Coil spring (78% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.12% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.047% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.026% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.021% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.010% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.17% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.031% fail on Wheel bearings (63% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.016% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.010% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0052% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.0052% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  • 0.89% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.87% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.64% fail on Compression ignition (87% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.56% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.041% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0052% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.0052% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.0052% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.0052% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.24% fail on Spark ignition (48% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.016% fail on Catalyst emissions (91% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0052% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.026% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.0052% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0052% fail on Undertray
  • 0.20% fail on Body, chassis, structure (63% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.052% fail on Exhaust system (68% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Transmission (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Drive shafts (77% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.041% fail on Joints (79% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0052% fail on Flexible couplings
    • 0.036% fail on Undertray (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.021% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.016% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0052% fail on Tank
    • 0.021% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.016% fail on Body
      • 0.016% fail on Other body component
    • 0.010% fail on Seats
      • 0.010% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.0052% fail on Doors
      • 0.0052% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.0052% fail on Door condition
  • 0.14% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (51% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.083% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Requirements
      • 0.0052% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.047% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (61% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.13% fail on Steering (50% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Steering linkage components (60% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Track rod end (65% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0052% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0052% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0052% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.0052% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.047% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.047% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.010% fail on Steering play
      • 0.010% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.12% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.093% fail on Attachment
    • 0.026% fail on Condition
  • 0.10% fail on Identification of the vehicle (52% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Registration plates (52% better than other 2016 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages