Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 201779.8% pass rate
from 1,136 tests in 2021
(59% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
6.7% fail on
Tyres
(95% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Tread depth
-
6.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(140% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
(7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp (8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 1.3% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 0.97% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.18% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.18% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.18% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.18% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.18% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.18% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.18% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.088% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.088% fail on Switch
-
4.3% fail on
Headlamps
(7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Suspension
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Linkage ball joints (14 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint (19 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Linkage
- 0.088% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.088% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.88% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.62% fail on Pins and bushes (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Ball joint dust cover (6 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint
- 0.26% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.18% fail on
Springs
-
0.18% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.18% fail on Coil spring
-
0.18% fail on
Coil springs
- 0.088% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.088% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Visibility
(43% better than other 2017 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Washers (81% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Wipers (87% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.088% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.088% fail on Windscreen
-
2.0% fail on
Brakes
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.088% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.088% fail on Brake discs
-
1.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
0.62% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.26% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.18% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.088% fail on
Rbt
- 0.088% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.088% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.088% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.088% fail on
Rbt
-
0.18% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.18% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
0.26% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
-
0.088% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.088% fail on Leaks
-
0.088% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
- 0.088% fail on Electronic braking system
-
1.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.53% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.4% fail on
Compression ignition
(5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.44% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.18% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.088% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.088% fail on Pipe
-
0.088% fail on
Transmission
-
0.088% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.088% fail on Joints
-
0.088% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.088% fail on
Seats
- 0.088% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.26% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.26% fail on Registration plates
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.26% fail on Condition
-
0.26% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.088% fail on
Steering
-
0.088% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.088% fail on Steering rack
-
0.088% fail on
Steering gear
-
0.088% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.088% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Grand Scenic (2016 - 2020)
Classy cabin with a range of family-friendly features, avant-garde styling helps the car to stand out in a crowded market, all versions boast a comprehensive list of equipment.