Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 201677.6% pass rate
from 1,338 tests in 2021
(35% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
10% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(200% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 5.5% fail on Stop lamp (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.0% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamps
(110% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp (130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Direction indicators
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.82% fail on Side repeaters (200% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.82% fail on
Flashing type
(130% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Reversing lamps
(12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Reversing lamps (12 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(47 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (55 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
0.15% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.15% fail on Horn
- 0.075% fail on Rear reflectors
-
4.5% fail on
Brakes
(61% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(52% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 2.3% fail on Brake pads
-
0.97% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.97% fail on Brake discs
-
2.3% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
1.2% fail on
Brake performance
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt
- 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.75% fail on
Rbt
-
0.37% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.37% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.37% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 0.37% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
0.22% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
- 0.22% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.22% fail on
Rbt
-
0.75% fail on
Service brake performance
-
0.60% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Electronic braking system (37 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Electronic stability control
- 0.15% fail on Anti-lock braking system
-
0.30% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.30% fail on Electronic parking brake (15 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.075% fail on Master cylinder
-
0.075% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.075% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.075% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.075% fail on Other components
-
2.9% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(52% worse than other 2016 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Visibility
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 0.90% fail on Washers
-
0.075% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.075% fail on Windscreen
-
3.7% fail on
Tyres
- 2.3% fail on Condition
- 1.5% fail on Tread depth
- 0.075% fail on Size/type
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joints (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Ball joint (16 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Linkage (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
-
0.15% fail on
Springs
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Coil springs
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Coil spring (87% better than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Coil springs
(87% better than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.15% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.075% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint
-
0.075% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.075% fail on Suspension rod
-
1.1% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(4 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.90% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.075% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
- 0.075% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
-
0.15% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.15% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Compression ignition
(2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.82% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 0.15% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.15% fail on
Transmission
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.15% fail on Joints
-
0.15% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.15% fail on
Doors
-
0.15% fail on
Driver's door
(18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Door condition (19 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Driver's door
(18 times worse than other 2016 cars)
-
0.075% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.075% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
-
0.075% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.075% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.075% fail on
Body
- 0.075% fail on Panel
-
0.075% fail on
Seats
- 0.075% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.075% fail on Undertray
-
0.60% fail on
Steering
-
0.45% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 0.37% fail on Track rod end
- 0.075% fail on Ball joint
-
0.075% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.075% fail on Steering rack
-
0.075% fail on
Steering play
- 0.075% fail on Steering rack
-
0.45% fail on
Steering linkage components
-
0.37% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.37% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.37% fail on Condition
-
0.37% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.15% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.15% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Grand Scenic (2016 - 2020)
Classy cabin with a range of family-friendly features, avant-garde styling helps the car to stand out in a crowded market, all versions boast a comprehensive list of equipment.