Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results
Registered in 201062.1% pass rate
from 6,626 tests in 2017
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(33% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.0% fail on Stop lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Headlamps
(56% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.5% fail on Headlamp (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Tell tale (42 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Position lamps
(44% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Front lamps (46% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Rear lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Direction indicators
(31% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
(31% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Side repeaters (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Individual lamps (69% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.030% fail on All direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Flashing type
(31% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.14% fail on Horn
- 0.091% fail on Battery
- 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors
- 0.030% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.015% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
0.015% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.015% fail on Switch
-
12% fail on
Suspension
(48% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Couplings
-
0.030% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.030% fail on Drive shafts
-
4.5% fail on
Front drive shafts
(5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Coil springs
(34% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.4% fail on Condition (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Location
-
1.9% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.11% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.015% fail on Condition
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
-
1.2% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.56% fail on
Shock absorbers
(47% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.56% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.30% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.18% fail on Rear
- 0.12% fail on Front
-
0.091% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.091% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.060% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.060% fail on Condition
-
0.015% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.5% fail on
Drive shafts
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.9% fail on
Brakes
(42% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Hub components
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.7% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.91% fail on Brake discs (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Brake linings
- 0.015% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.3% fail on
Brake performance
(42% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Front wheels (53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.091% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.36% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.33% fail on
Components
- 0.14% fail on Hoses
- 0.12% fail on Pipes (59% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.075% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.045% fail on Leaks
- 0.030% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
0.33% fail on
Components
- 0.35% fail on ABS (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.33% fail on
Parking brake
- 0.33% fail on Electronic parking brake (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
- 0.20% fail on Anti-slip (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.20% fail on
Pedal
- 0.015% fail on Restricted movement
-
6.1% fail on
Hub components
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Tyres
(14% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Tread depth (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Condition
- 0.18% fail on Size/type
- 0.045% fail on Valve stem
-
5.0% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 3.2% fail on Wipers (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Washers (24% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Windscreen
- 0.14% fail on Mirrors
- 0.045% fail on Bonnet
-
4.6% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.5% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.060% fail on Steering arm
- 0.045% fail on Steering rack
- 0.015% fail on Drag link end
-
0.030% fail on
Power steering
- 0.015% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.015% fail on Other components
-
4.5% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(99% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.71% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Requirements
- 0.015% fail on Attachment
- 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.36% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.71% fail on
Seat belts
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.50% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.18% fail on
Doors
- 0.075% fail on Drivers
- 0.060% fail on Passengers other
- 0.045% fail on Passengers front
- 0.14% fail on Body condition
-
0.12% fail on
Seats
- 0.091% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Drivers
- 0.060% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.18% fail on
Doors
-
0.42% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.42% fail on Registration plate
-
0.35% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(75% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Emissions (65% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.045% fail on System
- 0.030% fail on Tank
- 0.015% fail on Pipe
- 0.015% fail on Cap
- 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.060% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Attachment
- 0.060% fail on Condition
-
0.030% fail on
Towbars
(10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)