MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Scenic » 2010

Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
53.4% pass rate
from 7,432 tests in 2020
(40% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Headlamps (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.027% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.013% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Switch (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.013% fail on Front fog lamp switch
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp aim (20% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Reversing lamps (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Reversing lamps (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Reversing lamp switch (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps (23% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Position lamp (23% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.98% fail on Side repeaters (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.50% fail on Individual direction indicators (56% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on All direction indicators
      • 0.013% fail on Semaphore
        • 0.013% fail on Arm
    • 0.62% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.62% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (40 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.26% fail on Horn
      • 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.027% fail on Trailer electrical socket
      • 0.027% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 0.027% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.027% fail on Switch
    • 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 17% fail on Suspension (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.7% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 8.6% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.11% fail on Mounting (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (94% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Linkage
      • 0.13% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.067% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.027% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.2% fail on Ball joint (88% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Pins and bushes (82% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.55% fail on Shock absorbers (59% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.20% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.19% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.16% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.094% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.040% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.027% fail on Macpherson strut
    • 0.067% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.027% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.013% fail on Axles
      • 0.013% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.013% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.013% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
  • 10% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 10% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.027% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.013% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.22% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.20% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.013% fail on Operation
    • 0.027% fail on Steering play
      • 0.027% fail on Steering rack
  • 8.7% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Mechanical brake components (82% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Brake linings and pads (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 5.1% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Brake discs and drums (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Brake discs (53% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Brake performance (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.98% fail on Service brake performance (41% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt (41% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.87% fail on Service brake performance (36% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.51% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (62% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Rbt (sp) (59% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (44% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp) (46% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Service brake imbalance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.094% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.013% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.013% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance (71% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.17% fail on Rbt (70% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.16% fail on Parking brake performance (69% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.013% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.62% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Anti-lock braking system (60% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.12% fail on Electronic stability control
      • 0.067% fail on Electronic braking system (15 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Parking brake control (71% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Electronic parking brake (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.54% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.46% fail on Brake fluid (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.24% fail on Rigid brake pipes (54% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.16% fail on Pedal
      • 0.013% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.081% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.081% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.081% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.013% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.013% fail on Other components
  • 7.3% fail on Tyres (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.7% fail on Tread depth (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Visibility (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Wipers (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on View to rear
      • 0.26% fail on Mirrors (84% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.11% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.11% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.027% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Exhaust emissions (68% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.13% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.054% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.027% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.013% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.013% fail on Catalytic converter
      • 0.74% fail on Spark ignition (50% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.067% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.040% fail on Emissions not tested (77% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Non catalyst emissions
    • 0.094% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.054% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.040% fail on Engine oil leaks
    • 0.040% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.040% fail on Undertray
  • 4.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure (25% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.2% fail on Joints (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.027% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.027% fail on Flexible couplings (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.054% fail on Joints
      • 0.013% fail on Belts
    • 0.15% fail on Seats
      • 0.13% fail on Passenger's seat (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.11% fail on Undertray
    • 0.094% fail on Doors
      • 0.054% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.027% fail on Door condition
        • 0.027% fail on Catch (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.040% fail on Door condition
    • 0.081% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.067% fail on Body
      • 0.040% fail on Panel
      • 0.027% fail on Other body component
    • 0.054% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.040% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
      • 0.013% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.013% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.027% fail on Fuel system (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Hose
      • 0.013% fail on System
    • 0.027% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.013% fail on Spare wheel condition
      • 0.013% fail on Carrier
    • 0.013% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.013% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.62% fail on Seat belts (76% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Condition (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.054% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.50% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.50% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.42% fail on Attachment
    • 0.081% fail on Condition
  • 0.38% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.38% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.013% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.013% fail on Belt(s)/padding

Search Good Garages