MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Scenic » 2010

Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
50.1% pass rate
from 6,678 tests in 2021
(41% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 13% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 13% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 13% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Mounting
    • 7.4% fail on Anti-roll bars (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Linkage ball joints (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Linkage (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.10% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.090% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.045% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover (94% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.8% fail on Ball joint (86% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.42% fail on Pins and bushes (75% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.015% fail on Suspension arm
    • 0.54% fail on Shock absorbers (35% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.46% fail on Other suspension component (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.015% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.21% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.045% fail on Axles
      • 0.045% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
    • 0.045% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.030% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.015% fail on Suspension rod
    • 0.030% fail on Sub-frames (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.015% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.030% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 10% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Headlamps (24% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Headlamp (30% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.030% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
      • 0.015% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.1% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.045% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.55% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Reversing lamps (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Reversing lamps (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Reversing lamp switch (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.88% fail on Individual direction indicators (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.81% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.060% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.73% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (32 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.27% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.27% fail on Position lamp (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.21% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.13% fail on Horn
      • 0.060% fail on Trailer electrical socket (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.060% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.015% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
        • 0.015% fail on Steering component
    • 0.19% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.19% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.090% fail on Steering play
      • 0.090% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.015% fail on Power steering
      • 0.015% fail on Operation
    • 0.015% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.015% fail on Universal joint
  • 11% fail on Brakes (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Brake linings (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Brake discs and drums (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Brake discs (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Brake performance (29% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.7% fail on Rbt
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.21% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.87% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (52% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.87% fail on Rbt (sp) (49% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.42% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.34% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.015% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.42% fail on Parking brake performance (47% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (47% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.31% fail on Parking brake performance (53% better than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.060% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.030% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.015% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.015% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.93% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Anti-lock braking system (50% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Electronic braking system (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Electronic stability control (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic systems (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Brake fluid (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.030% fail on Valves
      • 0.015% fail on Servos
      • 0.015% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.45% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.43% fail on Electronic parking brake (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Lever
    • 0.21% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.21% fail on Pedal
    • 0.10% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.090% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.090% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.0% fail on Tyres (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth (27% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 6.2% fail on Visibility (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Washers (29% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on View to rear
      • 0.16% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.075% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.075% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.075% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.030% fail on Driver's view
  • 4.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (37% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.060% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.060% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.030% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.015% fail on Particulate filter
          • 0.015% fail on Other emission control equipment
        • 0.015% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
      • 0.96% fail on Spark ignition (53% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.85% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.090% fail on Catalyst emissions (90% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Emissions not tested (91% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.090% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
      • 0.015% fail on Other leaks
    • 0.030% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.030% fail on Undertray
  • 4.2% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.3% fail on Transmission (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Drive shafts (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.1% fail on Joints (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Drive shaft
      • 0.12% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.12% fail on Joints
    • 0.24% fail on Doors
      • 0.090% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.060% fail on Door condition
        • 0.030% fail on Catch (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.090% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.060% fail on Catch (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on Door condition
      • 0.060% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.045% fail on Door condition
        • 0.015% fail on Hinge
    • 0.16% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Seats
      • 0.12% fail on Passenger's seat (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.045% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.10% fail on Body
      • 0.10% fail on Other body component
    • 0.090% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.060% fail on Pipe
      • 0.030% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.075% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.075% fail on Undertray
    • 0.030% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.030% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.015% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.015% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.015% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.015% fail on Boot lid
      • 0.015% fail on Boot lid condition
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.99% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.060% fail on Requirements
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment
    • 0.37% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.46% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.36% fail on Attachment
    • 0.10% fail on Condition
  • 0.28% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.28% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages