Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2010
62.1% pass rate
from 6,626 tests in 2017
(29% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (33% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Stop lamp (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Headlamps (56% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp (63% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Tell tale (42 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Position lamps (44% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Front lamps (46% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Rear lamps
    • 1.0% fail on Direction indicators (31% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Flashing type (31% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.78% fail on Side repeaters (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Individual lamps (69% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.030% fail on All direction indicators (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.14% fail on Horn
    • 0.091% fail on Battery
    • 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.030% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.015% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.015% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.015% fail on Switch
  • 12% fail on Suspension (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Drive shafts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Front drive shafts (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 4.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.015% fail on Couplings
      • 0.030% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.030% fail on Drive shafts
    • 4.4% fail on Coil springs (34% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Condition (35% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Location
    • 1.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.24% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.11% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.015% fail on Condition
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.56% fail on Shock absorbers (47% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Condition (47% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.30% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.18% fail on Rear
      • 0.12% fail on Front
    • 0.091% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.091% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.060% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.060% fail on Condition
    • 0.015% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.015% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 7.9% fail on Brakes (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Hub components (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.91% fail on Brake discs (64% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.015% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.3% fail on Brake performance (42% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.54% fail on Rear wheels (48% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.36% fail on Parking brake performance (52% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Front wheels (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.091% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.075% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.060% fail on Service brake performance
    • 0.36% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.33% fail on Components
        • 0.14% fail on Hoses
        • 0.12% fail on Pipes (59% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.075% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.045% fail on Leaks
      • 0.030% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
    • 0.35% fail on ABS (75% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Parking brake
      • 0.33% fail on Electronic parking brake (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.20% fail on Pedal
        • 0.20% fail on Anti-slip (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Restricted movement
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres (14% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Tread depth (23% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
    • 0.045% fail on Valve stem
  • 5.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.2% fail on Wipers (20% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Washers (24% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.47% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.14% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.045% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.6% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Steering system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.045% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.015% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.030% fail on Power steering
      • 0.015% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.015% fail on Other components
  • 1.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (99% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Seat belts (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.66% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Requirements
      • 0.015% fail on Attachment
      • 0.015% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 0.36% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.35% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
      • 0.015% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.50% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.18% fail on Doors
      • 0.075% fail on Drivers
      • 0.060% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.045% fail on Passengers front
    • 0.14% fail on Body condition
    • 0.12% fail on Seats
      • 0.091% fail on Passengers (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Drivers
    • 0.060% fail on Spare wheel (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.42% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.42% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.35% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (75% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions (65% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.045% fail on System
      • 0.030% fail on Tank
      • 0.015% fail on Pipe
      • 0.015% fail on Cap
    • 0.075% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.060% fail on Exhaust system (94% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.17% fail on Attachment
    • 0.060% fail on Condition
  • 0.030% fail on Towbars (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Towbar (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)

Search Good Garages