MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Scenic » 2009

Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2009
47.7% pass rate
from 2,060 tests in 2021
(38% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 17% fail on Springs (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 17% fail on Coil springs (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 17% fail on Coil spring (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.097% fail on Mounting
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joints (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.92% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Linkage
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 0.097% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.097% fail on Ball joint dust cover (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms (30% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.1% fail on Ball joint (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Pins and bushes (60% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.58% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.68% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.34% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.24% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.049% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.049% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.097% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.049% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.049% fail on Ball joint
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (50% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Stop lamp (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.097% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.049% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 2.9% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Switch
    • 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.44% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.83% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.53% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.5% fail on Reversing lamps (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Reversing lamps (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.39% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (26 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.19% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.097% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.049% fail on Electrical wiring
      • 0.049% fail on Horn
    • 0.097% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.049% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.049% fail on Switch
  • 11% fail on Brakes (29% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Mechanical brake components (85% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Brake linings
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (77% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Brake discs (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.15% fail on Cable
        • 0.049% fail on Lever
        • 0.049% fail on Brake slack adjuster
    • 4.1% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.29% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.3% fail on Rbt
          • 1.0% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.24% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.049% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.49% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.49% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.44% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.44% fail on Brake performance not tested (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Anti-lock braking system (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Electronic braking system (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 1.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.83% fail on Parking brake control (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Electronic parking brake (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.19% fail on Brake fluid
      • 0.049% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.15% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.15% fail on Pedal
    • 0.097% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.049% fail on Air and vacuum systems
      • 0.049% fail on Servos
    • 0.049% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.049% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.049% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Other components
  • 9.9% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.5% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.1% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.049% fail on Steering arm
    • 1.2% fail on Steering gear (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Steering rack (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Steering play (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.049% fail on Power steering
      • 0.049% fail on Other components
  • 7.2% fail on Tyres
    • 5.1% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 0.24% fail on Size/type
  • 6.8% fail on Visibility
    • 4.4% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.19% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.19% fail on View to rear
      • 0.19% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.049% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.7% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.7% fail on Transmission (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Drive shafts (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.6% fail on Joints (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.049% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.097% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.097% fail on Joints
    • 0.34% fail on Exhaust system (83% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Seats
      • 0.15% fail on Passenger's seat
      • 0.049% fail on Driver's seat
    • 0.097% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.097% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.097% fail on Chassis
      • 0.097% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.097% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.097% fail on Body
      • 0.097% fail on Other body component
    • 0.097% fail on Doors
      • 0.097% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.097% fail on Door condition
    • 0.049% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.049% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.049% fail on Engine mounting
      • 0.049% fail on Engine mounting condition
    • 0.049% fail on Passenger compartment
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.5% fail on Compression ignition (71% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.83% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.097% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.049% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.049% fail on Particulate filter
        • 0.049% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.049% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.0% fail on Spark ignition (63% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.15% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.29% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.29% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 1.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.73% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.53% fail on Condition
      • 0.097% fail on Attachment (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.049% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.049% fail on Requirements
    • 0.63% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.049% fail on Airbags
      • 0.049% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.53% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.44% fail on Attachment
    • 0.097% fail on Condition
  • 0.39% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.39% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages