MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Scenic » 2009

Renault Grand Scenic MOT Results

Registered in 2009
54.0% pass rate
from 2,266 tests in 2017
(40% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Scenic is unusually good or bad.

  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (63% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Position lamps (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Front lamps (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.088% fail on All position lamps
    • 7.0% fail on Registration plate lamp (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp (80% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
        • 0.044% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on Fog lamp (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Tell tale (38 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Switch (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.7% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.71% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.71% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.26% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.18% fail on Battery
    • 0.13% fail on Horn
    • 0.13% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.088% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.088% fail on Switch
      • 0.044% fail on Lamp
  • 16% fail on Suspension (51% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Coil springs (84% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Condition (86% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Front drive shafts (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Constant velocity joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.044% fail on Couplings
    • 3.1% fail on Suspension arms (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (66% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Attachment
    • 2.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.18% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.088% fail on Attachment
    • 0.75% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.49% fail on Shock absorbers (58% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Condition (58% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.44% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.26% fail on Front
      • 0.18% fail on Rear
    • 0.18% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.18% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.088% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.044% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.044% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 11% fail on Brakes (64% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Hub components (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.5% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.79% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.044% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.044% fail on Brake calipers
    • 3.0% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.8% fail on Rear wheels
      • 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.53% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.13% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.088% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.088% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 1.3% fail on Parking brake (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Electronic parking brake (38 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Condition
    • 0.75% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.49% fail on Components
        • 0.22% fail on Pipes
        • 0.13% fail on Hoses
        • 0.13% fail on Reservoirs (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Leaks
      • 0.13% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.044% fail on Operation
    • 0.49% fail on ABS
    • 0.31% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.22% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
        • 0.18% fail on Anti-slip
        • 0.044% fail on Condition
    • 0.088% fail on Electronic stability system
    • 0.044% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.044% fail on Cable
  • 8.9% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Tread depth (48% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.22% fail on Size/type
  • 8.3% fail on Steering (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.3% fail on Steering system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Track rod end (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.53% fail on Ball joint (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.44% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drag link end (16 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Steering arm (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Free play
        • 0.044% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.044% fail on Other components
        • 0.044% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.044% fail on Steering control
      • 0.044% fail on Steering lock
  • 5.7% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.4% fail on Wipers
    • 2.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.26% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.088% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.088% fail on Mirrors
  • 1.8% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.75% fail on Seat belts (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.57% fail on Condition (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Attachment (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.044% fail on Requirements
      • 0.044% fail on Installation check
        • 0.044% fail on Anchorage's
  • 0.57% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.31% fail on Seats (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Drivers
      • 0.13% fail on Passengers
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.044% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.044% fail on Doors
      • 0.044% fail on Drivers
    • 0.044% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.53% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.26% fail on Attachment
    • 0.13% fail on Condition
  • 0.26% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (87% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Exhaust system (90% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.044% fail on Emissions

Search Good Garages