MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Modus » 2010

Renault Grand Modus MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.1% pass rate
from 1,140 tests in 2021
(23% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Modus is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension (74% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 17% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 17% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 17% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Mounting (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (90% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Ball joint dust cover (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.26% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.088% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint (79% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.61% fail on Sub-frames (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.26% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.35% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.18% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.088% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.088% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.26% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.18% fail on Shock absorbers (79% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.088% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.088% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint
  • 10% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.3% fail on Headlamp aim (50% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.6% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.088% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.26% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.088% fail on Switch
    • 0.26% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.26% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.18% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.18% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.18% fail on Horn
  • 8.0% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.8% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Locking devices (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.088% fail on Drag link end
    • 0.18% fail on Steering play
      • 0.18% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.088% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.088% fail on Steering rack
  • 7.9% fail on Brakes
    • 4.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.3% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.3% fail on Rbt
          • 2.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.26% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.9% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
        • 0.088% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 1.3% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
        • 0.088% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.088% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.18% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.18% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.18% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.088% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 2.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.7% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.7% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.96% fail on Brake linings and pads (54% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Brake pads (53% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.96% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.88% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Pedal
    • 0.79% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.79% fail on Lever (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.79% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.18% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.18% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.088% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.088% fail on Brake fluid
  • 6.6% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.18% fail on Size/type
  • 4.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 4.2% fail on Compression ignition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.8% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.44% fail on Emissions not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.088% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.44% fail on Spark ignition (79% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.26% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (73% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.18% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.088% fail on Catalyst emissions
    • 0.26% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 4.6% fail on Visibility
    • 2.6% fail on Washers
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
    • 0.35% fail on View to rear
      • 0.35% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.088% fail on Bonnet
    • 0.088% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.088% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Seat belts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.088% fail on Requirements
    • 0.88% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.8% fail on Body, chassis, structure (56% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.1% fail on Transmission
      • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts
        • 1.1% fail on Joints
    • 0.26% fail on Spare wheel (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Spare wheel condition (42 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.18% fail on Body
      • 0.088% fail on Panel
      • 0.088% fail on Other body component
    • 0.088% fail on Exhaust system
  • 0.53% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.53% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.18% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter (60 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.18% fail on Speedometer (62 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.088% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.088% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages