Renault Grand Modus MOT Results

Registered in 2010
57.4% pass rate
from 1,242 tests in 2020
(24% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Modus is unusually good or bad.

  • 18% fail on Suspension (66% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 12% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 12% fail on Coil spring (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Suspension arms (42% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.16% fail on Pins and bushes (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 3.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 1.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.72% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.64% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.32% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.48% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Sub-frame (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.32% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.24% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.081% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.16% fail on Shock absorbers (88% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.16% fail on Ball joint dust cover (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 4.3% fail on Headlamps (51% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Headlamp (59% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.89% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.6% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.16% fail on All position lamps
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.97% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.40% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.081% fail on All direction indicators
    • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.24% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.24% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.16% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.16% fail on Horn
  • 9.1% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Drag link end (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.24% fail on Steering column (27 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.16% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.081% fail on Power steering
      • 0.081% fail on Operation
  • 6.6% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.1% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.2% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.2% fail on Brake discs
    • 2.6% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.6% fail on Rbt
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.24% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.081% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.081% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 0.97% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.97% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.40% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.32% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.40% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Rbt
          • 0.32% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.081% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake control (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.32% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.24% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.081% fail on Pedal
    • 0.16% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.16% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.16% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.16% fail on Anti-lock braking system
    • 0.081% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.081% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 5.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.1% fail on Tread depth
    • 3.0% fail on Condition
    • 0.16% fail on Size/type
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 1.9% fail on Washers
    • 1.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.24% fail on View to rear
      • 0.24% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.081% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.081% fail on Windscreen
  • 3.7% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.5% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.5% fail on Compression ignition (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.081% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.081% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
      • 0.081% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.081% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.24% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.24% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 3.1% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Seat belts (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.56% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.081% fail on Airbags
      • 0.081% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 2.0% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.72% fail on Transmission
      • 0.72% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.72% fail on Joints
    • 0.32% fail on Exhaust system (76% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.24% fail on Spare wheel (21 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.16% fail on Spare wheel condition (24 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.081% fail on Carrier
    • 0.081% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.081% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.081% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.081% fail on Chassis
      • 0.081% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.081% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.081% fail on Tank
    • 0.081% fail on Doors
      • 0.081% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.081% fail on Door condition
    • 0.081% fail on Seats
      • 0.081% fail on Driver's seat
  • 0.24% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.081% fail on Registration plates
    • 0.081% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.081% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.081% fail on Speedometer

Search Good Garages