Renault Grand Modus MOT Results
Registered in 200964.3% pass rate
from 577 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Modus is unusually good or bad.
-
17% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 5.4% fail on Stop lamp (67% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.8% fail on Rear lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Front lamps
- 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 3.1% fail on Headlamp aim
-
2.4% fail on
Headlamps
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp
-
2.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.35% fail on Side repeaters
-
2.1% fail on
Flashing type
-
0.17% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.17% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.17% fail on Horn
-
12% fail on
Suspension
-
8.3% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Location
-
1.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.6% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.35% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.17% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.17% fail on Condition
-
0.17% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.17% fail on Front
-
0.17% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.17% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.17% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
8.3% fail on
Coil springs
(100% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.4% fail on
Tyres
- 4.5% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.17% fail on Size/type
-
5.0% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Other components
- 0.17% fail on Steering pivot point
-
5.0% fail on
Steering system
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.5% fail on
Brakes
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
- 1.0% fail on Brake discs
- 0.87% fail on Brake pads
- 0.17% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.52% fail on Front wheels
- 0.52% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.17% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.17% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.0% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.0% fail on Condition
-
0.35% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
- 0.35% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.35% fail on
Pedal
-
0.17% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
0.17% fail on
Components
- 0.17% fail on Pipes
-
0.17% fail on
Components
-
1.7% fail on
Hub components
-
3.1% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
(10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.1% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Seat belts
(10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(47% better than other 2009 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Washers
- 0.87% fail on Wipers (69% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Windscreen
- 0.35% fail on Mirrors
-
0.52% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(74% better than other 2009 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Exhaust system
- 0.17% fail on Emissions
-
0.35% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passengers
-
0.17% fail on
Load security
- 0.17% fail on Bootlid
-
0.17% fail on
Seats
-
0.35% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.35% fail on Registration plate
-
0.17% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.17% fail on Condition