MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Modus » 2009

Renault Grand Modus MOT Results

Registered in 2009
55.7% pass rate
from 664 tests in 2020
(19% worse than other 2009 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Modus is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (33% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.3% fail on Stop lamp (74% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 2.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual direction indicators (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.15% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.7% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 2.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.60% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.30% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.30% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.30% fail on Horn
  • 16% fail on Suspension (28% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.8% fail on Springs (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.8% fail on Coil springs (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.8% fail on Coil spring (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.0% fail on Ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.60% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
    • 3.5% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.75% fail on Sub-frames (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.15% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.15% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.15% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.15% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
  • 8.9% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 8.4% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.15% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.15% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.15% fail on Steering column
  • 6.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.4% fail on Condition
    • 0.15% fail on Size/type
  • 5.7% fail on Brakes
    • 2.7% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.1% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 2.1% fail on Brake discs
      • 1.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 2.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt
          • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.60% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.30% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.30% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.15% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.30% fail on Rbt
          • 0.30% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.75% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.75% fail on Lever
    • 0.30% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.30% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.15% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.15% fail on Servos
    • 0.15% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 4.1% fail on Visibility
    • 2.3% fail on Washers
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers
    • 0.15% fail on View to rear
      • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
  • 3.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.8% fail on Compression ignition (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.6% fail on On or after 01/07/2008 (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.15% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
      • 0.15% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
  • 3.0% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Seat belts (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Condition (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure (62% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.60% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.30% fail on Transmission (81% better than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Drive shafts (80% better than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.30% fail on Joints (80% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame
        • 0.15% fail on Sub-frame condition
    • 0.15% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.15% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.15% fail on Doors
      • 0.15% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.15% fail on Door condition
  • 0.60% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.60% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.15% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.15% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages