Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2010

54.5% pass rate

from 253 tests in 2021

(29% worse than other 2010 cars)

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

21% fail on Suspension (55% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Springs (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 11% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 11% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 8.3% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes
- 3.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 0.79% fail on Pins and bushes (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Ball joint dust cover
  - 0.79% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
  - 0.40% fail on Anti-roll bar
  - 0.40% fail on Linkage
  - 0.40% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.79% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.40% fail on Wheel bearings
15% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
- 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
- 3.6% fail on Headlamps
  - 2.8% fail on Headlamp
  - 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
  - 0.40% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
- 3.2% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 2.8% fail on Headlamp aim
  - 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 2.8% fail on Hazard warning (52 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 2.8% fail on Switch (52 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 1.2% fail on Direction indicators
  - 1.2% fail on Flashing type
    - 0.79% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.40% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
  - 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
    - 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
- 0.40% fail on Electrical equipment
  - 0.40% fail on Horn
9.5% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.5% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 9.5% fail on Track rod end (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Ball joint
8.7% fail on Brakes
- 2.8% fail on Brake performance
  - 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
    - 1.6% fail on Rbt
      - 1.2% fail on Parking brake performance
      - 0.40% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
  - 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt
      - 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
      - 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
  - 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
    - 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
  - 0.40% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
    - 0.40% fail on Rbt (sp)
      - 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
- 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
  - 1.6% fail on Brake discs and drums
    - 1.6% fail on Brake discs
  - 1.2% fail on Brake linings and pads
    - 1.2% fail on Brake pads
- 1.2% fail on Rigid brake pipes
- 1.2% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
  - 1.2% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.79% fail on Hydraulic systems (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Brake fluid (11 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.79% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.79% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
  - 0.40% fail on Pedal
- 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
  - 0.40% fail on Electronic parking brake
5.9% fail on Tyres
- 3.6% fail on Tread depth
- 2.0% fail on Condition
- 0.40% fail on Size/type
4.3% fail on Visibility
- 2.0% fail on Washers
- 1.6% fail on Wipers
- 0.40% fail on Driver's view
- 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
  - 0.40% fail on Windscreen
3.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
- 2.8% fail on Transmission
  - 2.8% fail on Drive shafts
    - 2.8% fail on Joints
- 0.79% fail on Doors
  - 0.79% fail on Other passenger's door (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    - 0.79% fail on Door condition (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.40% fail on Engine mounting
  - 0.40% fail on Engine mounting condition
2.4% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 1.6% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.79% fail on Seat belts
  - 0.79% fail on Condition
2.4% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
- 2.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
  - 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
    - 2.0% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  - 0.40% fail on Spark ignition
    - 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
1.2% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.79% fail on Attachment
- 0.40% fail on Condition
0.79% fail on Identification of the vehicle
- 0.79% fail on Registration plates
0.40% fail on Seat belt installation check
- 0.40% fail on Belt(s)/padding