Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2010
61.5% pass rate
from 273 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 15% fail on Suspension
    • 7.7% fail on Springs (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.7% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.7% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.73% fail on Linkage ball joints
    • 4.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.7% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.73% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.37% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.6% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.73% fail on Headlamp levelling device (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.37% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.37% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.37% fail on Switch
  • 8.4% fail on Brakes
    • 4.0% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Brake discs (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.8% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Anti-lock braking system (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Electronic stability control (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.1% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.1% fail on Rbt
          • 0.73% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.37% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt
          • 0.73% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.73% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 0.73% fail on Rbt (sp)
    • 0.73% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.73% fail on Electronic parking brake (16 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.73% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.37% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.37% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.37% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
  • 7.0% fail on Steering (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Steering linkage components (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Track rod end (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.7% fail on Visibility
    • 1.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.1% fail on Washers
    • 0.73% fail on View to rear
      • 0.73% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.37% fail on Driver's view
  • 2.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.37% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.37% fail on Condition
  • 2.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.8% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.37% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
      • 0.37% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.37% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.73% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.73% fail on Attachment
  • 0.37% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.37% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.37% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.37% fail on Transmission
      • 0.37% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.37% fail on Joints

Search Good Garages