Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
48.4% pass rate
from 248 tests in 2020
(39% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension (88% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Springs (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 10% fail on Coil springs (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 10% fail on Coil spring (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.2% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.81% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage
    • 6.0% fail on Suspension arms
      • 6.0% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Shock absorbers (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.81% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.40% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (58% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.81% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.81% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 3.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.8% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 2.0% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.0% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.0% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.40% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.40% fail on Switch
    • 0.40% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.40% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 11% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 10% fail on Track rod end (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.40% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.40% fail on Power steering
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
      • 0.40% fail on Pipes and hoses
    • 0.40% fail on Steering wheel
  • 8.9% fail on Brakes
    • 5.2% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 3.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt
          • 1.6% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
        • 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.8% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.81% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.81% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.81% fail on Hydraulic systems (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.40% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.81% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.40% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.40% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
    • 0.40% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.40% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.40% fail on Electronic stability control
  • 6.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Transmission (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Drive shafts (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.0% fail on Joints (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
    • 1.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.40% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.40% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.40% fail on Carrier
    • 0.40% fail on Undertray
  • 5.2% fail on Visibility
    • 2.8% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
    • 0.40% fail on Driver's view
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 3.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.6% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.0% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.2% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.40% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 1.6% fail on Spark ignition
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.2% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.81% fail on Attachment
    • 0.40% fail on Condition
  • 0.81% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.81% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages