Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
45.1% pass rate
from 206 tests in 2021
(43% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Suspension (76% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Springs (94% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Coil springs (95% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 11% fail on Coil spring (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Suspension arms (87% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 7.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (99% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
    • 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.49% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
  • 17% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.4% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.97% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.9% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.49% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 1.5% fail on Hazard warning (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Switch (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.49% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 16% fail on Brakes (78% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 9.2% fail on Mechanical brake components (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 6.8% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Brake discs and drums (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.9% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 3.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 1.9% fail on Rbt
          • 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 2.9% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.97% fail on Electronic parking brake (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.97% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
    • 0.49% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 11% fail on Steering (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering linkage components (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Ball joint
  • 9.2% fail on Tyres
    • 6.3% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.49% fail on Size/type
  • 8.7% fail on Visibility
    • 4.9% fail on Washers
    • 3.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.49% fail on View to rear
      • 0.49% fail on Mirrors
  • 4.9% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.4% fail on Transmission
      • 3.4% fail on Drive shafts
        • 3.4% fail on Joints
    • 0.97% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.49% fail on Seats
      • 0.49% fail on Passenger's seat
  • 2.9% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 2.9% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 1.9% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.97% fail on Spark ignition
        • 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.97% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
    • 0.49% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.49% fail on Condition
  • 1.5% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.5% fail on Attachment
  • 0.49% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.49% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages