Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.3% pass rate
from 208 tests in 2017
(34% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (49% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.7% fail on Headlamp aim (92% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.3% fail on Front lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Switch
    • 4.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.4% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.96% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.96% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (18 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.48% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 4.3% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.96% fail on Battery
    • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.48% fail on Fog lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.48% fail on Lamp
    • 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 9.1% fail on Coil springs (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 2.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 2.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.9% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.9% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.96% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.48% fail on Attachment
    • 0.96% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 0.48% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.48% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.48% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.48% fail on Rear
  • 10% fail on Brakes
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.3% fail on Rear wheels (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.96% fail on Front wheels
      • 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.9% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.48% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.48% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.48% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.9% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Electronic parking brake (59 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.48% fail on Components
        • 0.48% fail on Pipes
    • 0.48% fail on ABS
  • 9.1% fail on Steering (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.7% fail on Steering system (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 7.7% fail on Track rod end (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Steering arm
    • 0.48% fail on Power steering
      • 0.48% fail on Operation
  • 6.7% fail on Tyres
    • 3.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.48% fail on Size/type
  • 5.3% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 2.9% fail on Washers
    • 2.4% fail on Wipers
  • 1.9% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 1.9% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 1.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.96% fail on Seats (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Passengers
      • 0.48% fail on Drivers
    • 0.48% fail on Body condition
  • 0.96% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.96% fail on Exhaust system

Search Good Garages