Renault Grand Espace MOT Results
Registered in 200945.1% pass rate
from 206 tests in 2021
(43% worse than other 2009 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Suspension
(76% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Springs
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(95% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 11% fail on Coil spring (96% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(95% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(87% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
7.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(99% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Ball joint dust cover (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
- 2.4% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.49% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.49% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
-
11% fail on
Springs
(94% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
17% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.9% fail on Headlamp aim
- 3.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.97% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.4% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.9% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp
- 0.49% fail on Headlamp levelling device
-
1.5% fail on
Hazard warning
(22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Switch (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.49% fail on Position lamp
-
0.49% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.49% fail on Trailer electrical socket
-
3.9% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
16% fail on
Brakes
(78% worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 6.8% fail on Brake pads (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Brake discs (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Brake performance
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
3.4% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Service brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.9% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.49% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
-
3.4% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Electronic stability control (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.97% fail on Electronic parking brake (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.97% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
(5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.97% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
0.49% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.49% fail on Brake fluid
- 0.49% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
9.2% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering
(3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
11% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 11% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
- 0.49% fail on Ball joint
-
11% fail on
Steering linkage components
(4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
-
9.2% fail on
Tyres
- 6.3% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth
- 0.49% fail on Size/type
-
8.7% fail on
Visibility
- 4.9% fail on Washers
- 3.9% fail on Wipers
-
0.49% fail on
View to rear
- 0.49% fail on Mirrors
-
4.9% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.4% fail on
Transmission
-
3.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.4% fail on Joints
-
3.4% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.97% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.49% fail on
Seats
- 0.49% fail on Passenger's seat
-
3.4% fail on
Transmission
-
2.9% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.9% fail on
Compression ignition
- 1.9% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
- 0.49% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.97% fail on
Spark ignition
- 0.97% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
1.9% fail on
Compression ignition
-
2.9% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 0.97% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.49% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.49% fail on Condition
-
1.5% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.5% fail on Attachment
-
0.49% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 0.49% fail on Registration plates