Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2002
49.8% pass rate
from 231 tests in 2017
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 24% fail on Suspension
    • 7.4% fail on Drive shafts
      • 7.4% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 7.4% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 6.1% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 4.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.87% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.43% fail on Linkage condition
    • 5.2% fail on Coil springs
      • 5.2% fail on Condition
    • 4.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.7% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.7% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 0.87% fail on Front
      • 0.43% fail on Rear
    • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.87% fail on Component mounting
      • 0.43% fail on Subframe mounting
    • 0.87% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.87% fail on Condition
    • 0.43% fail on Trailing arms
      • 0.43% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.43% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.43% fail on Condition
  • 23% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 6.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.5% fail on Headlamp
      • 2.2% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (22 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.7% fail on Headlamp cleaning device (29 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
      • 0.87% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.43% fail on Headlamp levelling device
        • 0.43% fail on Headlamp cleaning device
    • 4.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.0% fail on Front lamps
      • 1.7% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 4.3% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 3.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 3.0% fail on Individual lamps
        • 0.43% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.6% fail on Headlamp aim (66% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Battery
    • 0.43% fail on Trailer electrical socket
    • 0.43% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.43% fail on Switch
    • 0.43% fail on Horn
  • 22% fail on Brakes
    • 15% fail on Brake performance (72% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 9.1% fail on Parking brake performance (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Rear wheels
      • 3.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 1.3% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.43% fail on Brake operation
    • 6.1% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.1% fail on Components
        • 4.3% fail on Pipes
        • 1.7% fail on Hoses
    • 3.9% fail on Hub components
      • 3.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.43% fail on Brake discs
      • 0.43% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.7% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.7% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Mechanical components (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Lever (45 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Cable
    • 1.3% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.87% fail on ABS
  • 18% fail on Driver's view of the road (92% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 11% fail on Washers (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 9.1% fail on Wipers
    • 0.43% fail on Windscreen
  • 16% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10.0% fail on Exhaust system (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Emissions
    • 3.0% fail on Fuel system (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Cap
      • 1.3% fail on System (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.43% fail on Tank
    • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
  • 7.4% fail on Steering
    • 7.4% fail on Steering system
      • 5.2% fail on Steering rack (4 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.43% fail on Free play
        • 0.43% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.43% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
        • 0.43% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.87% fail on Power steering
      • 0.43% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.43% fail on Other components
    • 0.43% fail on Steering control
      • 0.43% fail on Steering lock
  • 6.1% fail on Tyres
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.2% fail on Condition
  • 6.1% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 4.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Requirements (29 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Condition
      • 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 2.2% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 3.9% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 1.3% fail on Body condition
    • 1.3% fail on Seats (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Passengers (11 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.43% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 0.43% fail on Chassis
    • 0.43% fail on Doors
      • 0.43% fail on Passengers other
    • 0.43% fail on Spare wheel
  • 0.43% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 0.43% fail on Registration plate

Search Good Garages