MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Grand Espace » 2000

Renault Grand Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2000
38.9% pass rate
from 72 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 33% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
    • 13% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 11% fail on Stop lamp
    • 9.7% fail on Position lamps
      • 5.6% fail on Front lamps
      • 4.2% fail on Rear lamps
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 4.2% fail on Headlamp
    • 4.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 4.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.8% fail on Side repeaters
        • 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
    • 2.8% fail on Battery
    • 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 1.4% fail on Horn
  • 33% fail on Suspension
    • 15% fail on Drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 15% fail on Front drive shafts (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 15% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 8.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Sub-frames
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 1.4% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.4% fail on Rear
    • 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
  • 31% fail on Brakes (77% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 22% fail on Brake performance (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 15% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.9% fail on Front wheels
      • 6.9% fail on Rear wheels
      • 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
    • 11% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 9.7% fail on Components
        • 8.3% fail on Pipes
        • 1.4% fail on Hoses
      • 1.4% fail on Leaks
    • 8.3% fail on Hub components
      • 4.2% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.4% fail on Brake calipers
    • 1.4% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.4% fail on Condition
    • 1.4% fail on Mechanical components
      • 1.4% fail on Cable
  • 17% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 11% fail on Wipers
    • 11% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 8.3% fail on Exhaust system
    • 6.9% fail on Emissions
    • 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.4% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.4% fail on Tank
  • 11% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (200% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 5.6% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Passengers other (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Drivers
      • 1.4% fail on Passengers front
    • 2.8% fail on Speedometer (97 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 2.8% fail on Body condition
    • 1.4% fail on Engine mountings
    • 1.4% fail on Vehicle structure
      • 1.4% fail on Chassis
  • 5.6% fail on Steering
    • 5.6% fail on Steering system
      • 4.2% fail on Steering rack
      • 1.4% fail on Steering arm
  • 5.6% fail on Tyres
    • 2.8% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 2.8% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.8% fail on Requirements (32 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp

Search Good Garages