Renault Grand Espace MOT Results
Registered in 200038.9% pass rate
from 72 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Grand Espace is unusually good or bad.
-
33% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 13% fail on Headlamp aim
- 11% fail on Stop lamp
-
9.7% fail on
Position lamps
- 5.6% fail on Front lamps
- 4.2% fail on Rear lamps
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.2% fail on Headlamp
-
4.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Side repeaters
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
-
4.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.8% fail on Battery
- 2.8% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 1.4% fail on Horn
-
33% fail on
Suspension
-
15% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 15% fail on Constant velocity joints (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Front drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 9.7% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
9.7% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 8.3% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
2.8% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 2.8% fail on Condition
-
2.8% fail on
Sub-frames
- 2.8% fail on Condition (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.4% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Rear
- 1.4% fail on Front suspension joints
-
1.4% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 1.4% fail on Subframe mounting
-
15% fail on
Drive shafts
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
31% fail on
Brakes
(77% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
22% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 15% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Front wheels
- 6.9% fail on Rear wheels
- 2.8% fail on Service brake performance
-
11% fail on
Hydraulic systems
-
9.7% fail on
Components
- 8.3% fail on Pipes
- 1.4% fail on Hoses
- 1.4% fail on Leaks
-
9.7% fail on
Components
-
8.3% fail on
Hub components
- 4.2% fail on Brake discs (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Brake pads
- 1.4% fail on Brake calipers
-
1.4% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.4% fail on Condition
-
1.4% fail on
Mechanical components
- 1.4% fail on Cable
-
22% fail on
Brake performance
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
17% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 11% fail on Wipers
- 11% fail on Washers (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
15% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 8.3% fail on Exhaust system
- 6.9% fail on Emissions
- 2.8% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.4% fail on
Fuel system
- 1.4% fail on Tank
-
11% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(200% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Doors
(8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Passengers other (7 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Drivers
- 1.4% fail on Passengers front
- 2.8% fail on Speedometer (97 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.8% fail on Body condition
- 1.4% fail on Engine mountings
-
1.4% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 1.4% fail on Chassis
-
5.6% fail on
Doors
(8 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Steering
-
5.6% fail on
Steering system
- 4.2% fail on Steering rack
- 1.4% fail on Steering arm
-
5.6% fail on
Steering system
-
5.6% fail on
Tyres
- 2.8% fail on Condition
- 2.8% fail on Tread depth
-
4.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.8% fail on Requirements (32 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.4% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
-
2.8% fail on
Seat belts