Renault Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
44.0% pass rate
from 182 tests in 2017
(72% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 27% fail on Suspension (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 21% fail on Coil springs (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 21% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Shock absorbers (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Suspension arms
      • 3.3% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 2.7% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.55% fail on Linkage condition
    • 2.7% fail on Front suspension joints (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Drive shafts
      • 1.6% fail on Front drive shafts
        • 1.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
    • 1.1% fail on Wheel bearings
      • 1.1% fail on Front
  • 25% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (60% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 8.8% fail on Headlamp aim (120% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Registration plate lamp
    • 6.0% fail on Position lamps
      • 6.0% fail on Front lamps
    • 5.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.5% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Direction indicators
      • 2.2% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.2% fail on Individual lamps
    • 1.1% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.1% fail on Fog lamp
    • 1.1% fail on Hazard warning (21 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Lamp
      • 0.55% fail on Switch
    • 0.55% fail on Battery
  • 13% fail on Brakes (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Brake performance (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Rear wheels (200% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.55% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.55% fail on Front wheels
    • 4.9% fail on Hub components
      • 4.9% fail on Brake pads
    • 1.6% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 1.6% fail on Components
        • 0.55% fail on Pipes
        • 0.55% fail on Hoses
        • 0.55% fail on Reservoirs
    • 1.1% fail on Parking brake
      • 1.1% fail on Electronic parking brake (33 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on Electronic stability system
  • 12% fail on Steering (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 12% fail on Steering system (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 12% fail on Track rod end (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 8.2% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 2.7% fail on Condition
    • 0.55% fail on Size/type
  • 6.0% fail on Driver's view of the road
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
    • 0.55% fail on Windscreen
  • 1.1% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.1% fail on Attachment
  • 1.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
    • 0.55% fail on Exhaust system
    • 0.55% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.55% fail on Pipe
  • 1.1% fail on Registration plates and VIN
    • 1.1% fail on Registration plate
  • 0.55% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
    • 0.55% fail on Supplementary restraint systems
      • 0.55% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
  • 0.55% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
    • 0.55% fail on Doors
      • 0.55% fail on Passengers other
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages