Renault Espace MOT Results

Registered in 2009
53.1% pass rate
from 207 tests in 2020
(28% worse than other 2009 cars)
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Espace is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.97% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 5.8% fail on Headlamps
      • 5.8% fail on Headlamp
    • 5.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.4% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.4% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.9% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.9% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.9% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.48% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.48% fail on Switch
    • 0.48% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Switch
    • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.48% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 18% fail on Suspension
    • 10% fail on Springs (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 10% fail on Coil springs (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 10% fail on Coil spring (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.8% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.8% fail on Ball joint (150% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.48% fail on Linkage
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 1.4% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 17% fail on Brakes (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.8% fail on Brake pads (140% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs
    • 6.3% fail on Brake performance
      • 2.9% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.9% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.9% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.48% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 0.48% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 0.48% fail on Service brake imbalance
    • 3.4% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Anti-lock braking system (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Electronic stability control (14 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.9% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders) (15 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.9% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (23 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Hydraulic systems (10 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Brake fluid (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.97% fail on Electronic parking brake (22 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.48% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.48% fail on Pedal
  • 11% fail on Steering (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 10% fail on Steering linkage components (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.7% fail on Track rod end (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.48% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.48% fail on Steering gear
      • 0.48% fail on Steering rack
  • 5.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.3% fail on Transmission (170% worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Drive shafts (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Joints (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.97% fail on Bumpers (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 5.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 2.9% fail on Tread depth
  • 4.8% fail on Visibility
    • 2.4% fail on Washers
    • 1.9% fail on Wipers
    • 0.48% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.48% fail on View to rear
      • 0.48% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 4.3% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 4.3% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 2.9% fail on Spark ignition
        • 2.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.48% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.4% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.4% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 1.9% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 1.9% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 0.97% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.97% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.48% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.48% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages