Renault Espace MOT Results
Registered in 200451.8% pass rate
from 840 tests in 2017
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2004 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Espace is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.4% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
7.0% fail on
Position lamps
- 6.2% fail on Front lamps
- 0.95% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.12% fail on All position lamps
- 6.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
5.1% fail on
Headlamps
- 4.8% fail on Headlamp
-
0.24% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.12% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
-
0.12% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
- 0.12% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.12% fail on Dipswitch
- 3.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.6% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
-
3.1% fail on
Flashing type
- 3.0% fail on Battery (2 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Hazard warning
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Lamp (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Horn
- 0.60% fail on Electrical wiring (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.60% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.60% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.24% fail on Trailer electrical socket (8 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
23% fail on
Suspension
-
8.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 6.5% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (51% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.24% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
6.4% fail on
Coil springs
- 6.3% fail on Condition
- 0.24% fail on Location
-
5.8% fail on
Suspension arms
- 5.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
4.6% fail on
Drive shafts
-
4.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 4.6% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
4.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 1.3% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.95% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.95% fail on Condition
-
0.60% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 0.36% fail on Front
- 0.24% fail on Rear
-
0.24% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.24% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.12% fail on
Panhard rods
- 0.12% fail on Condition
-
0.12% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.12% fail on Component mounting
-
8.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.5% fail on Rear wheels (49% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 3.7% fail on Parking brake performance
- 1.5% fail on Front wheels
- 0.71% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.60% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Hub components
- 4.0% fail on Brake pads (58% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.95% fail on Brake discs
- 0.36% fail on Brake calipers
- 3.9% fail on ABS (3 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(40% better than other 2004 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Components
(43% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Pipes
- 0.60% fail on Hoses
- 0.12% fail on Pump
- 0.24% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
- 0.12% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Leaks
-
2.7% fail on
Components
(43% better than other 2004 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.1% fail on Electronic parking brake (30 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.60% fail on Electronic stability system
- 0.36% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.12% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
- 0.12% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.12% fail on
Pedal
-
8.6% fail on
Brake performance
-
10% fail on
Tyres
- 6.0% fail on Tread depth
- 4.3% fail on Condition
- 0.95% fail on Size/type (190% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.12% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
- 0.12% fail on Valve stem
-
9.5% fail on
Steering
(95% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
8.8% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Track rod end (130% worse than other 2004 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Steering rack
-
0.36% fail on
Free play
- 0.36% fail on Steering rack
- 0.36% fail on Steering arm
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint
-
0.48% fail on
Steering control
(5 times worse than other 2004 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Steering lock (25 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Locking devices
-
8.8% fail on
Steering system
(100% worse than other 2004 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(40% better than other 2004 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers (46% better than other 2004 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Mirrors
- 0.12% fail on Windscreen
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(34% better than other 2004 cars)
- 2.0% fail on Exhaust system (47% better than other 2004 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Emissions
-
0.48% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.36% fail on System
- 0.12% fail on Hose
- 0.24% fail on Emissions not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
0.95% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 0.60% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.36% fail on Drivers airbag
-
0.71% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.60% fail on Condition
- 0.12% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.95% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
-
1.5% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 0.71% fail on Body condition
-
0.48% fail on
Doors
- 0.48% fail on Passengers other
-
0.36% fail on
Seats
- 0.24% fail on Passengers
- 0.12% fail on Drivers
- 0.24% fail on Spare wheel (7 times worse than other 2004 cars)
-
0.24% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 0.24% fail on Registration plate
-
0.12% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.12% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review
-
Renault Espace (2002 - 2012)
Full of kit, comfortable and refined. Very versatile seven-seat layout. Excellent crash test rating.