Renault Clio MOT Results
Registered in 201784.4% pass rate
from 19,800 tests in 2021
(18% worse than other 2017 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2017 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.
-
5.1% fail on
Visibility
(39% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Wipers (21% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Washers (94% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.066% fail on
View to rear
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.061% fail on Mirrors (120% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
0.020% fail on
Condition of glass
(69% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Windscreen (68% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Bonnet
-
3.4% fail on
Brakes
(66% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(55% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(52% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Brake pads (52% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Brake linings
-
0.64% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(87% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Brake discs (88% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0051% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.0051% fail on Lever
-
1.9% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(52% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Brake performance
(130% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Service brake performance
(190% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.69% fail on Service brake performance (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.14% fail on Service brake imbalance (160% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0051% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.0051% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.81% fail on
Rbt
(190% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.23% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(85% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Rbt (sp) (94% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.15% fail on
Parking brake performance
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Parking brake performance (180% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.035% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Plate brake tester
(7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Parking brake performance (17 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.14% fail on
Rbt
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.11% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(89% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.11% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(89% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.81% fail on
Service brake performance
(190% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.086% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.056% fail on Hand lever
- 0.030% fail on Pedal
- 0.086% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.081% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.081% fail on Lever
-
0.015% fail on
Hydraulic systems
- 0.015% fail on Brake fluid
-
0.015% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(77% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Anti-lock braking system
- 0.0051% fail on Electronic stability control
-
0.0051% fail on
Air and vacuum systems
- 0.0051% fail on Leaks
- 0.0051% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
2.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
(55% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
3.1% fail on
Tyres
- 1.9% fail on Condition
- 1.2% fail on Tread depth (19% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Size/type
-
2.4% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.0051% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
0.27% fail on
Headlamps
(47% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Headlamp (44% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 0.010% fail on Dipswitch
-
0.26% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.26% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.051% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.010% fail on All direction indicators
-
0.26% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.25% fail on Stop lamp
- 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
- 0.045% fail on Rear reflectors (140% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(72% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.040% fail on Rear fog lamp (72% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(72% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.030% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.025% fail on Position lamp
- 0.0051% fail on Switch
-
0.030% fail on
Reversing lamps
- 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
-
0.025% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.015% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.0051% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.0051% fail on Horn
-
1.5% fail on
Headlamp aim
-
1.6% fail on
Suspension
(79% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.70% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Ball joint (7 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Pins and bushes (79% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.0051% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
-
0.61% fail on
Springs
(79% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.61% fail on
Coil springs
(80% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.61% fail on Coil spring (82% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Mounting
-
0.61% fail on
Coil springs
(80% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.13% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.056% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 0.025% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint
- 0.010% fail on Linkage
- 0.010% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 0.010% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.11% fail on Shock absorbers
- 0.056% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.020% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.020% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.0051% fail on
Suspension rods
- 0.0051% fail on Suspension rod
- 0.0051% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
0.70% fail on
Suspension arms
(2 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.65% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
0.63% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.51% fail on
Spark ignition
(64% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.36% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (85% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.15% fail on Catalyst emissions
-
0.0051% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.0051% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.0051% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.12% fail on
Compression ignition
(46% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.086% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (47% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.010% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
- 0.0051% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
-
0.51% fail on
Spark ignition
(64% worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.010% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.0051% fail on Other leaks
-
0.0051% fail on
Noise suppression
- 0.0051% fail on Undertray
-
0.63% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
0.26% fail on
Road Wheels
(64% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Condition (200% worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Attachment
-
0.23% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
0.096% fail on
Transmission
-
0.096% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.096% fail on Joints
-
0.096% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.030% fail on
Doors
-
0.010% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.010% fail on Door condition
-
0.010% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.010% fail on Door condition
-
0.010% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.010% fail on Door condition
-
0.010% fail on
Driver's door
-
0.025% fail on
Body
- 0.015% fail on Panel
- 0.010% fail on Other body component
-
0.025% fail on
Seats
- 0.025% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.015% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.010% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.0051% fail on Tank
-
0.010% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(8 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (11 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Exhaust system (86% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Bumpers
-
0.0051% fail on
Spare wheel
- 0.0051% fail on Spare wheel condition
-
0.0051% fail on
Engine mounting
- 0.0051% fail on Engine mounting condition
-
0.096% fail on
Transmission
-
0.14% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(40% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.076% fail on Condition
- 0.030% fail on Requirements (4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Prescribed areas (18 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.0051% fail on Attachment
- 0.020% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (81% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.12% fail on
Seat belts
-
0.081% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
(61% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.081% fail on Registration plates (61% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.071% fail on
Steering
(53% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.040% fail on
Steering linkage components
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.025% fail on Track rod end (73% better than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Ball joint
-
0.015% fail on
Steering gear
- 0.015% fail on Steering rack
-
0.010% fail on
Steering play
- 0.010% fail on Steering rack
- 0.0051% fail on Steering column
-
0.040% fail on
Steering linkage components
(60% better than other 2017 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Seat belt installation check
(4 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Belt(s)/padding (5 times worse than other 2017 cars)
-
0.010% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
(20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
- 0.010% fail on Speedometer (20 times worse than other 2017 cars)
Read the Honest John Review