Renault Clio MOT Results

Registered in 2016
85.0% pass rate
from 23,101 tests in 2020
(18% worse than other 2016 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2016 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.

  • 4.4% fail on Visibility (54% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Wipers (58% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.3% fail on Washers (52% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on View to rear (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Mirrors (170% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.052% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.052% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.0043% fail on Bonnet
  • 4.0% fail on Brakes (98% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Mechanical brake components (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 2.9% fail on Brake linings and pads (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Brake pads (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.026% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.55% fail on Brake discs and drums (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Brake discs (140% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.0087% fail on Cable
    • 0.93% fail on Brake performance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.60% fail on Rbt (160% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.49% fail on Service brake performance (180% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.13% fail on Service brake imbalance (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0087% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0043% fail on Service brake performance
          • 0.0043% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0043% fail on Decelerometer
          • 0.0043% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.22% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (84% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.21% fail on Rbt (sp) (90% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.0043% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.17% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.16% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.15% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0087% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
          • 0.0043% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0087% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0043% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.0043% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.10% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.10% fail on Rbt (sp) (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.100% fail on Service brake imbalance (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
          • 0.0087% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.026% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 0.12% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.069% fail on Hand lever
      • 0.048% fail on Pedal
    • 0.12% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.12% fail on Lever
    • 0.048% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.043% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0043% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.035% fail on Flexible brake hoses
    • 0.022% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC
      • 0.022% fail on Anti-lock braking system
      • 0.0043% fail on Electronic stability control
    • 0.0087% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.0043% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.0043% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 3.3% fail on Tyres
    • 2.0% fail on Condition
    • 1.3% fail on Tread depth (24% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.061% fail on Tyre pressure monitoring system
    • 0.056% fail on Size/type
  • 2.9% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (17% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Headlamp aim (21% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Headlamp aim (22% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.035% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 0.46% fail on Headlamps
      • 0.45% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.0087% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 0.35% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.35% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.28% fail on Side repeaters
        • 0.069% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.0087% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.0043% fail on Switch
    • 0.28% fail on Position lamps (59% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.26% fail on Position lamp (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.0043% fail on Switch
    • 0.28% fail on Stop lamp (29% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (46% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.091% fail on Rear reflectors (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.065% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.048% fail on Horn
      • 0.013% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.0043% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.056% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (62% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.056% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.056% fail on Rear fog lamp (61% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.030% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.026% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.0043% fail on Reversing lamp switch
    • 0.0043% fail on Daytime running lamps
  • 0.72% fail on Suspension
    • 0.29% fail on Suspension arms (99% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.29% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0043% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.23% fail on Springs (53% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Coil springs (54% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.23% fail on Coil spring (56% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.15% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 0.048% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.026% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0043% fail on Linkage
      • 0.0043% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.022% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 0.013% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.0087% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0043% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.0043% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.0043% fail on Macpherson strut
  • 0.46% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 0.42% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 0.35% fail on Spark ignition (87% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.22% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (86% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.14% fail on Catalyst emissions (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.074% fail on Compression ignition (58% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.043% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2016 cars)
        • 0.022% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
        • 0.0087% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.030% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 0.026% fail on Engine oil leaks
      • 0.0043% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.0087% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.0043% fail on Sound deadening material
      • 0.0043% fail on Undertray
  • 0.33% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 0.091% fail on Body (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.061% fail on Other body component (110% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Panel (3 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.082% fail on Transmission
      • 0.074% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.074% fail on Joints
      • 0.0087% fail on Belts (29 times worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.048% fail on Seats (120% worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.043% fail on Driver's seat (2 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0043% fail on Passenger's seat
    • 0.039% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.030% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.017% fail on Pipe (6 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0087% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
      • 0.0043% fail on Tank
    • 0.013% fail on Undertray
    • 0.0087% fail on Exhaust system (84% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.0087% fail on Doors
      • 0.0087% fail on Driver's door
        • 0.0087% fail on Door condition
    • 0.0043% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 0.0043% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 0.0043% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0043% fail on Spare wheel condition
    • 0.0043% fail on Towbar
      • 0.0043% fail on Towbar condition
  • 0.23% fail on Road Wheels (63% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Condition (150% worse than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Attachment
  • 0.16% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (35% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Seat belts
      • 0.13% fail on Condition
      • 0.0043% fail on Requirements
    • 0.030% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (66% better than other 2016 cars)
  • 0.16% fail on Identification of the vehicle (34% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.16% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.048% fail on Steering (62% better than other 2016 cars)
    • 0.043% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 0.017% fail on Track rod end (79% better than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.0087% fail on Drag link end (7 times worse than other 2016 cars)
      • 0.0043% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0043% fail on Steering play
      • 0.0043% fail on Steering rack
  • 0.0043% fail on Seat belt installation check
    • 0.0043% fail on Belt(s)/padding
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages