Renault Clio MOT Results
Registered in 201055.7% pass rate
from 26,349 tests in 2017
(51% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.
-
26% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(91% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
6.9% fail on
Position lamps
(130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.4% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Rear lamps
- 0.057% fail on All position lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.9% fail on
Headlamps
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.015% fail on
Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
- 0.015% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0076% fail on
Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
- 0.0038% fail on Matched pair
- 0.0038% fail on Dipswitch
-
3.6% fail on
Direction indicators
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.6% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.66% fail on Side repeaters (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.36% fail on All direction indicators (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Switch
- 0.0038% fail on Tell tales
-
3.6% fail on
Flashing type
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.45% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.44% fail on Fog lamp
- 0.015% fail on Tell tale
- 0.011% fail on Switch
- 0.25% fail on Horn (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Battery
-
0.030% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.019% fail on Switch
- 0.011% fail on Lamp
- 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
-
16% fail on
Suspension
(100% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 11% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(62% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.011% fail on Attachment
- 0.0038% fail on Condition
-
1.8% fail on
Suspension arms
(41% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Condition
- 0.0076% fail on Attachment
-
1.1% fail on
Drive shafts
(52% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(54% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0038% fail on Couplings
-
0.0038% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.0038% fail on Drive shafts
-
1.1% fail on
Front drive shafts
(54% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.85% fail on Front suspension joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.53% fail on
Wheel bearings
(65% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.41% fail on Rear (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Front
-
0.20% fail on
Shock absorbers
(81% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.20% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.095% fail on
Sub-frames
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.083% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.083% fail on Condition
-
0.072% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.065% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.0076% fail on Condition
-
0.030% fail on
Prescribed areas
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Subframe mounting (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.011% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.0076% fail on General condition
-
0.0038% fail on
Torque/reaction arms
- 0.0038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
11% fail on
Coil springs
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Steering
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Track rod end (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.24% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Steering rack
- 0.072% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.053% fail on
Free play
(190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.053% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Drag link end (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.0038% fail on
Other components
- 0.0038% fail on Steering pivot point
-
0.011% fail on
Steering control
- 0.0076% fail on Steering lock
-
0.0038% fail on
Steering coupling
- 0.0038% fail on Universal joint
- 0.011% fail on Locking devices
- 0.0076% fail on Steering operation
-
0.0076% fail on
Power steering
(87% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0038% fail on Electronic power steering
- 0.0038% fail on Rams
-
8.2% fail on
Steering system
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
7.7% fail on
Tyres
(13% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.9% fail on Tread depth (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Condition (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Size/type (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Valve stem (56% better than other 2010 cars)
-
6.8% fail on
Brakes
(22% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Hub components
(15% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Brake pads
- 1.1% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.015% fail on Brake linings
- 0.0038% fail on Brake back plates
-
2.4% fail on
Brake performance
- 1.0% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.92% fail on Front wheels (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.28% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.057% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 0.011% fail on Brake operation
-
1.5% fail on
Parking brake
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Service brake control components
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Pedal
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.28% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0038% fail on Condition
-
0.28% fail on
Pedal
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.27% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(51% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Components
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.19% fail on Pipes (36% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.057% fail on Hoses
- 0.0038% fail on Cylinders
- 0.0038% fail on Servos
- 0.0038% fail on Valves
- 0.0076% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0076% fail on Leaks (85% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.25% fail on
Components
(39% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
- 0.083% fail on ABS (58% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.023% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.011% fail on Cable
- 0.0076% fail on Lever
- 0.0038% fail on Pivot
- 0.011% fail on Electronic stability system (84% better than other 2010 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Hub components
(15% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(18% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Washers (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Wipers (34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.32% fail on Windscreen
- 0.15% fail on Mirrors
- 0.0076% fail on Bonnet (92% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.0038% fail on Indirect vision devices
-
2.2% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.030% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Requirements
-
0.66% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.076% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.5% fail on
Seat belts
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(20% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.68% fail on Exhaust system (28% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.33% fail on Emissions
- 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.065% fail on
Fuel system
(68% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.042% fail on Cap (65% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.023% fail on Pipe
-
0.49% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
(48% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Spare wheel (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Body condition
-
0.095% fail on
Seats
- 0.083% fail on Drivers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.011% fail on Passengers
-
0.061% fail on
Doors
(53% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.038% fail on Passengers front
- 0.019% fail on Passengers other
- 0.0038% fail on Drivers
-
0.019% fail on
Vehicle structure
(4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.019% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.015% fail on Body security
- 0.0038% fail on Engine mountings
-
0.0038% fail on
Load security
- 0.0038% fail on Bootlid
-
0.29% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
(34% better than other 2010 cars)
- 0.29% fail on Registration plate (34% better than other 2010 cars)
-
0.28% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.21% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.072% fail on Attachment (62% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review