MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Clio » 2010

Renault Clio MOT Results

Registered in 2010
55.7% pass rate
from 26,349 tests in 2017
(51% worse than other 2010 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.

  • 26% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (91% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 7.6% fail on Stop lamp (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Position lamps (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Front lamps (170% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on Rear lamps
      • 0.057% fail on All position lamps (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Registration plate lamp (85% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.9% fail on Headlamp aim (73% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Headlamps (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Headlamp (120% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Switch (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Headlamp defects which do require an aim check on retest
        • 0.015% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale' (6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0076% fail on Headlamp defects which don't require an aim check on retest (87% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0076% fail on Main beam 'tell-tale'
      • 0.0038% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0038% fail on Dipswitch
    • 3.6% fail on Direction indicators (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.6% fail on Flashing type (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.66% fail on Side repeaters (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.36% fail on All direction indicators (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.019% fail on Switch
        • 0.0038% fail on Tell tales
    • 0.45% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 0.44% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.015% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 0.25% fail on Horn (40% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.23% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Rear reflectors (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.076% fail on Battery
    • 0.030% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.019% fail on Switch
      • 0.011% fail on Lamp
    • 0.015% fail on Electrical wiring
  • 16% fail on Suspension (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 11% fail on Coil springs (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 11% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Location (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.6% fail on Anti-roll bars (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.1% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints (70% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.38% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (62% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Linkage condition
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
      • 0.0038% fail on Condition
    • 1.8% fail on Suspension arms (41% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (43% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Condition
      • 0.0076% fail on Attachment
    • 1.1% fail on Drive shafts (52% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front drive shafts (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Constant velocity joints (54% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Couplings
      • 0.0038% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.0038% fail on Drive shafts
    • 0.85% fail on Front suspension joints (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.53% fail on Wheel bearings (65% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Rear (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Front
    • 0.20% fail on Shock absorbers (81% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Condition (81% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.095% fail on Sub-frames (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.072% fail on Condition (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.083% fail on Macpherson strut
      • 0.083% fail on Condition
    • 0.072% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.065% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.0076% fail on Condition
    • 0.030% fail on Prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Component mounting (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Subframe mounting (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.0076% fail on General condition
    • 0.0038% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.0038% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
  • 8.3% fail on Steering (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 8.2% fail on Steering system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.8% fail on Track rod end (10 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.24% fail on Ball joint (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.072% fail on Steering arm (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Free play (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Steering rack (190% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Drag link end (200% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0038% fail on Other components
        • 0.0038% fail on Steering pivot point
    • 0.011% fail on Steering control
      • 0.0076% fail on Steering lock
      • 0.0038% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.0038% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.011% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.0076% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.0076% fail on Power steering (87% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0038% fail on Electronic power steering
      • 0.0038% fail on Rams
  • 7.7% fail on Tyres (13% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.9% fail on Tread depth (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Condition (12% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Size/type (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.038% fail on Valve stem (56% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 6.8% fail on Brakes (22% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Hub components (15% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
      • 1.1% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Brake calipers
      • 0.015% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.0038% fail on Brake back plates
    • 2.4% fail on Brake performance
      • 1.0% fail on Rear wheels
      • 0.92% fail on Front wheels (44% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.64% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.28% fail on Brake imbalance
      • 0.057% fail on Service brake performance
      • 0.027% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.011% fail on Brake operation
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.28% fail on Anti-slip (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.0038% fail on Condition
    • 0.27% fail on Hydraulic systems (51% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Components (39% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Pipes (36% better than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.057% fail on Hoses
        • 0.0038% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.0038% fail on Servos
        • 0.0038% fail on Valves
      • 0.0076% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp (86% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.0076% fail on Leaks (85% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.083% fail on ABS (58% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.011% fail on Cable
      • 0.0076% fail on Lever
      • 0.0038% fail on Pivot
    • 0.011% fail on Electronic stability system (84% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 5.6% fail on Driver's view of the road (18% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Washers (98% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Wipers (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.32% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.15% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.0076% fail on Bonnet (92% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.0038% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 2.2% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Seat belts (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.030% fail on Attachment (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Prescribed areas (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.015% fail on Requirements
    • 0.66% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.59% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (130% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.076% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
  • 1.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (20% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.68% fail on Exhaust system (28% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on Emissions
    • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 0.065% fail on Fuel system (68% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.042% fail on Cap (65% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Pipe
  • 0.49% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (48% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.17% fail on Spare wheel (26 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Body condition
    • 0.095% fail on Seats
      • 0.083% fail on Drivers (100% worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Passengers
    • 0.061% fail on Doors (53% better than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.038% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.019% fail on Passengers other
      • 0.0038% fail on Drivers
    • 0.019% fail on Vehicle structure (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.019% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.015% fail on Body security
    • 0.0038% fail on Engine mountings
    • 0.0038% fail on Load security
      • 0.0038% fail on Bootlid
  • 0.29% fail on Registration plates and VIN (34% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.29% fail on Registration plate (34% better than other 2010 cars)
  • 0.28% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition (96% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.072% fail on Attachment (62% better than other 2010 cars)
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages