MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Renault » Clio » 2002

Renault Clio MOT Results

Registered in 2002
43.6% pass rate
from 15,006 tests in 2020
(17% worse than other 2002 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2002 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.

  • 28% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (36% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 10% fail on Headlamps (96% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 10% fail on Headlamp (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.19% fail on Headlamp levelling device (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.0067% fail on Matched pair
      • 0.0067% fail on Dipswitch
    • 8.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.3% fail on Headlamp aim (9.5% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.80% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.5% fail on Stop lamp (23% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.8% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.7% fail on Position lamp
      • 0.093% fail on All position lamps
      • 0.013% fail on Switch
    • 2.5% fail on Hazard warning (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Switch (13 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Electrical equipment (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.4% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.72% fail on Battery(ies) (75% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.78% fail on Direction indicators (67% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.78% fail on Flashing type (67% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Individual direction indicators (68% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.19% fail on Side repeaters (73% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.067% fail on All direction indicators (55% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.0067% fail on Switch
    • 0.53% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.51% fail on Rear fog lamp (62% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.020% fail on Switch
      • 0.013% fail on Front fog lamps
        • 0.013% fail on Front fog lamps
    • 0.053% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.033% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
      • 0.027% fail on Main beam tell-tale
    • 0.013% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 24% fail on Suspension (29% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.9% fail on Anti-roll bars (27% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins and bushes (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Linkage ball joints (90% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.15% fail on Anti-roll bar
      • 0.15% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (94% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Ball joint (89% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover (99% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Springs (99% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.7% fail on Coil springs (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Coil spring (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Mounting
      • 0.0067% fail on Leaf springs
        • 0.0067% fail on Spring saddle
      • 0.0067% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 6.1% fail on Suspension arms
      • 4.9% fail on Ball joint (81% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Pins and bushes (59% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.37% fail on Ball joint dust cover (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Suspension arm (76% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 4.6% fail on Wheel bearings (190% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Shock absorbers (110% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.89% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.35% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.28% fail on Macpherson strut (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.0067% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.69% fail on Other suspension component
      • 0.55% fail on Ball joint (90% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Ball joint dust cover
      • 0.047% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.033% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
      • 0.020% fail on Other suspension component
    • 0.21% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (93% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Sub-frames (80% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.060% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.033% fail on Ball joint (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.067% fail on Axles (60% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
      • 0.013% fail on Axle
    • 0.060% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.027% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.020% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.0067% fail on Suspension rod
      • 0.0067% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 0.0067% fail on Air/gas/fluid suspension
      • 0.0067% fail on Suspension unit
  • 14% fail on Brakes (11% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Brake performance (33% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (15% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (16% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 2.5% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (84% worse than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.0067% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.093% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.093% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles) (180% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (26% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (24% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 1.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.35% fail on Service brake performance (55% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (72% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Rbt (sp) (71% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.0067% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
        • 0.0067% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 0.62% fail on Parking brake performance (65% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt (64% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.54% fail on Parking brake performance (64% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.053% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (70% better than other 2002 cars)
          • 0.020% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
        • 0.0067% fail on Plate brake tester
          • 0.0067% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 0.15% fail on Brake performance not tested (49% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake discs and drums (60% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Brake discs (59% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Brake drums
      • 1.6% fail on Brake linings and pads (27% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Brake pads (27% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.013% fail on Brake linings
      • 0.23% fail on Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
        • 0.17% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.053% fail on Cable (75% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.0067% fail on Relay lever
    • 3.1% fail on Rigid brake pipes (21% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.7% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (93% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 2.7% fail on Anti-lock braking system (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Electronic stability control (94% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.87% fail on Parking brake control (64% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.87% fail on Lever (66% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems (61% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.39% fail on Brake fluid (88% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.073% fail on Reservoirs
      • 0.020% fail on Valves
      • 0.013% fail on Servos
      • 0.013% fail on Master cylinder
    • 0.41% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (33% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.22% fail on Pedal
      • 0.19% fail on Hand lever (39% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.19% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.14% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
      • 0.047% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers (66% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.0067% fail on Air brake cylinder/actuator
    • 0.100% fail on Load sensing valves (64% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.087% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.073% fail on Other components (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Prescribed areas
        • 0.013% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
    • 0.060% fail on Flexible brake hoses (86% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Air and vacuum systems (83% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Leaks
    • 0.0067% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.0067% fail on Attachment
  • 13% fail on Visibility (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.4% fail on Washers (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Wipers (27% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Bonnet (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.33% fail on View to rear
      • 0.33% fail on Mirrors
      • 0.0067% fail on Indirect vision devices
    • 0.28% fail on Driver's view
    • 0.24% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.24% fail on Windscreen
  • 12% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.1% fail on Steering gear (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Operation
    • 5.2% fail on Steering linkage components (55% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 4.8% fail on Track rod end (58% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint (100% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.067% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.0067% fail on Other components
        • 0.0067% fail on Steering linkage
      • 0.0067% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.15% fail on Steering play
      • 0.15% fail on Steering rack
    • 0.073% fail on Power steering (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Operation (61% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Pipes and hoses (83% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.0067% fail on Rams
    • 0.033% fail on Steering coupling
      • 0.033% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.020% fail on Steering wheel
    • 0.0067% fail on Steering column
    • 0.0067% fail on Electronic power steering
  • 11% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 6.7% fail on Transmission (67% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 6.4% fail on Drive shafts (69% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 6.3% fail on Joints (70% worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Drive shaft
        • 0.013% fail on Flexible couplings
      • 0.29% fail on Prop shafts
        • 0.29% fail on Joints (60% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Belts
    • 3.1% fail on Exhaust system (19% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Engine mounting (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.41% fail on Engine mounting condition (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Bracket (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.51% fail on Seats (82% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.33% fail on Driver's seat (83% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.18% fail on Passenger's seat (68% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.49% fail on Doors
      • 0.36% fail on Other passenger's door
        • 0.36% fail on Door condition
      • 0.080% fail on Front passenger's door (51% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.080% fail on Door condition
      • 0.053% fail on Driver's door (61% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.047% fail on Door condition (61% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.0067% fail on Catch
    • 0.28% fail on Body
      • 0.17% fail on Other body component
      • 0.093% fail on Panel
      • 0.020% fail on Body condition
    • 0.13% fail on Boot lid (170% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Boot lid condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.12% fail on Fuel system (82% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Pipe (74% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device (88% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.027% fail on Tank (83% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Hose
      • 0.013% fail on System (84% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.093% fail on Bumpers (61% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.067% fail on Integral vehicle structure (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.053% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (93% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.013% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 0.033% fail on Chassis (95% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.033% fail on Chassis condition (95% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.020% fail on Load security
      • 0.020% fail on Tailgate
        • 0.020% fail on Tailgate condition
    • 0.020% fail on Undertray (75% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.0067% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.0067% fail on Spare wheel condition
  • 9.2% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (140% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 7.2% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.1% fail on Seat belts
      • 1.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Prescribed areas (92% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.040% fail on Attachment
      • 0.027% fail on Requirements
      • 0.013% fail on Pre-tensioners
    • 0.33% fail on Airbags (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.31% fail on Drivers airbag (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.020% fail on Passengers airbag
  • 8.7% fail on Tyres (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Tread depth (36% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 2.9% fail on Condition
    • 0.26% fail on Size/type
  • 5.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (36% better than other 2002 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust emissions (44% better than other 2002 cars)
      • 3.4% fail on Spark ignition (48% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (42% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 1.1% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (63% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.65% fail on Emissions not tested (34% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.073% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.060% fail on Catalytic converter
          • 0.013% fail on Oxygen sensor
        • 0.033% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.85% fail on Compression ignition (25% better than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.54% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Turbo
        • 0.11% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 0.100% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.087% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
        • 0.027% fail on Emission control equipment
          • 0.027% fail on Catalytic converter
        • 0.013% fail on Pre 01/01/1980 visual (5 times worse than other 2002 cars)
        • 0.0067% fail on On or after 01/07/2008
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks (53% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Engine oil leaks (73% worse than other 2002 cars)
      • 0.047% fail on Transmission oil leaks
      • 0.033% fail on Other leaks
      • 0.027% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks
    • 0.013% fail on Noise suppression
      • 0.013% fail on Sound deadening material
  • 1.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plates (22% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.0067% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.34% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.24% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.100% fail on Attachment (68% better than other 2002 cars)
  • 0.060% fail on Seat belt installation check (2 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.047% fail on Anchorages (3 times worse than other 2002 cars)
    • 0.013% fail on Belt(s)/padding
  • 0.027% fail on Speedometer and speed limiter
    • 0.027% fail on Speedometer
  • 0.0067% fail on Buses and coaches supplementary tests
    • 0.0067% fail on Doors
      • 0.0067% fail on Passenger entrance/exit doors
Read the Honest John Review

  • Renault Clio (2001 - 2007)
    Well-equipped, good-looking hatch with a 'big car' feel. 172 grown to 182 and another cracking hot hatch. 4 Star NCAP crash safety rating.

    Search Good Garages