Renault Clio MOT Results

Registered in 2000
41.1% pass rate
from 8,714 tests in 2017
(20% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.

  • 34% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Position lamps (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.4% fail on Front lamps (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.6% fail on Rear lamps (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on All position lamps
    • 9.5% fail on Headlamp aim (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.9% fail on Registration plate lamp (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Headlamps (70% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.3% fail on Headlamp (76% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Matched pair
    • 6.8% fail on Stop lamp (22% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.1% fail on Flashing type
        • 2.6% fail on Individual lamps (53% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.38% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.23% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.011% fail on Tell tales
        • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 1.9% fail on Rear fog lamp
      • 1.9% fail on Fog lamp
      • 0.057% fail on Tell tale
      • 0.011% fail on Switch
    • 1.6% fail on Battery (46% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Horn (160% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Hazard warning (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.70% fail on Lamp (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.49% fail on Switch (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.11% fail on Tell tale (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Headlamp aim not tested (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.10% fail on Electrical wiring
    • 0.034% fail on Rear reflectors
    • 0.011% fail on Trailer electrical socket
  • 29% fail on Suspension (36% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Coil springs (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.6% fail on Condition (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Location
    • 8.6% fail on Drive shafts (99% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 8.5% fail on Front drive shafts (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Constant velocity joints (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.034% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.011% fail on Couplings
      • 0.13% fail on Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
        • 0.13% fail on Drive shafts
    • 6.8% fail on Anti-roll bars (38% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.8% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 1.9% fail on Linkage condition (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.85% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.22% fail on Condition (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.14% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Presence
    • 5.7% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 4.7% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.1% fail on Front (49% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.0% fail on Suspension arms (28% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (26% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 2.8% fail on Shock absorbers (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Condition (69% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Front suspension joints
    • 1.0% fail on Macpherson strut (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.0% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Prescribed areas (92% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.21% fail on Component mounting (95% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.17% fail on Subframe mounting (82% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Spring mounting
    • 0.18% fail on Tie bars/rods
      • 0.15% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
      • 0.023% fail on Condition
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.14% fail on Sub-frames (72% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Attachment
      • 0.057% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.080% fail on Trailing arms (82% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (82% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.034% fail on Radius arms
      • 0.034% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.011% fail on General condition
    • 0.011% fail on Fluid suspension
      • 0.011% fail on Suspension unit
    • 0.011% fail on Torsion bars
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.011% fail on Bonded suspension
      • 0.011% fail on Condition
    • 0.011% fail on Torque/reaction arms
      • 0.011% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
    • 0.011% fail on Axles
      • 0.011% fail on Axle beam
    • 0.011% fail on Front suspension retaining and locking devices
  • 23% fail on Brakes (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 14% fail on Brake performance (51% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.8% fail on Rear wheels (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 6.3% fail on Front wheels (97% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.2% fail on Parking brake performance (22% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Service brake performance (54% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.3% fail on Brake imbalance (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Brake operation
      • 0.069% fail on Brake performance not tested (62% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.0% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 6.6% fail on Components
        • 4.1% fail on Valves (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 1.9% fail on Pipes (54% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.55% fail on Reservoirs (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.42% fail on Hoses (72% better than other 2000 cars)
        • 0.092% fail on Cylinders
        • 0.011% fail on Servos
      • 0.45% fail on Leaks
      • 0.14% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
      • 0.13% fail on Operation
    • 5.7% fail on Parking brake (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 5.7% fail on Condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 3.4% fail on Hub components
      • 1.8% fail on Brake discs (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake pads (20% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.080% fail on Wheel cylinder
      • 0.057% fail on Brake drums (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Brake calipers (77% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.55% fail on ABS (60% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.30% fail on Restricted movement
    • 0.28% fail on Service brake control components
      • 0.28% fail on Pedal
        • 0.17% fail on Condition
        • 0.10% fail on Anti-slip
    • 0.21% fail on Mechanical components
      • 0.092% fail on Cable
      • 0.069% fail on Lever (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.023% fail on Linkage
      • 0.023% fail on Relay lever (11 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.023% fail on Locking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Additional braking devices
    • 0.011% fail on Hand operated control valves
      • 0.011% fail on Attachment
    • 0.011% fail on Prescribed areas
      • 0.011% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
  • 15% fail on Driver's view of the road (60% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 8.0% fail on Washers (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.3% fail on Wipers (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.72% fail on Bonnet (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.71% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.36% fail on Mirrors
    • 0.011% fail on Indirect vision devices
  • 15% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions (34% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 9.5% fail on Exhaust system (82% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 7.5% fail on Emissions (18% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested (27% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.20% fail on Fuel system (77% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.069% fail on Cap (75% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.057% fail on System (78% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.046% fail on Pipe
      • 0.011% fail on Tank
      • 0.011% fail on Hose
  • 11% fail on Steering (140% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 11% fail on Steering system (170% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 7.0% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.9% fail on Track rod end (58% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.45% fail on Ball joint
      • 0.16% fail on Steering arm
      • 0.092% fail on Free play
        • 0.092% fail on Steering rack
      • 0.080% fail on Drag link end
      • 0.011% fail on Other components
        • 0.011% fail on Steering component
    • 0.69% fail on Power steering
      • 0.34% fail on Operation (65% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.25% fail on Pipes and hoses
      • 0.11% fail on Other components
      • 0.046% fail on Drive system (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.011% fail on Pump
    • 0.080% fail on Steering control
      • 0.057% fail on Steering column
      • 0.011% fail on Steering wheel
      • 0.011% fail on Steering coupling
        • 0.011% fail on Universal joint
    • 0.023% fail on Steering operation
    • 0.023% fail on Locking devices
  • 11% fail on Tyres (24% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 6.6% fail on Tread depth (30% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.1% fail on Condition
    • 0.73% fail on Size/type (110% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.11% fail on Valve stem
  • 6.5% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (31% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Seat belts (17% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.30% fail on Prescribed areas (89% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.13% fail on Requirements
      • 0.069% fail on Attachment
      • 0.011% fail on Installation check
        • 0.011% fail on Anchorage's
    • 2.8% fail on Supplementary restraint systems (64% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 2.6% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp (62% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers airbag
      • 0.057% fail on Passengers airbag (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
  • 2.5% fail on Body, Structure and General Items (33% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.99% fail on Doors (63% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.56% fail on Passengers other (79% worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.23% fail on Passengers front
      • 0.20% fail on Drivers
    • 0.56% fail on Engine mountings (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.38% fail on Body condition (78% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.36% fail on Seats
      • 0.26% fail on Drivers
      • 0.092% fail on Passengers
    • 0.092% fail on Vehicle structure (90% better than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.092% fail on Chassis (90% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.092% fail on Body security
    • 0.080% fail on Load security
      • 0.046% fail on Access panel (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
      • 0.034% fail on Bootlid
    • 0.034% fail on Speedometer
  • 1.8% fail on Registration plates and VIN (42% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Registration plate (41% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.011% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
  • 0.37% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.21% fail on Condition (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.13% fail on Attachment (58% better than other 2000 cars)
    • 0.034% fail on Hubs (18 times worse than other 2000 cars)

Search Good Garages