Renault Clio MOT Results
Registered in 200047.9% pass rate
from 2,293 tests in 2021
(22% worse than other 2000 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2000 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(24% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Headlamps
(40% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 5.4% fail on Headlamp (47% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.3% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.1% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.52% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
1.6% fail on
Direction indicators
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.17% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.087% fail on Side repeaters (89% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.6% fail on
Flashing type
-
1.4% fail on
Electrical equipment
(66% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Battery(ies)
- 0.70% fail on Horn (100% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 1.0% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
1.0% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.87% fail on
Hazard warning
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.87% fail on Switch (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.22% fail on Position lamp
- 0.044% fail on Rear reflectors
-
5.6% fail on
Headlamps
(40% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
18% fail on
Suspension
(15% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Springs
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Coil spring (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.5% fail on
Coil springs
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.4% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Linkage (150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Pins and bushes
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.13% fail on Anti-roll bar
- 0.087% fail on Ball joint
- 0.087% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.044% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 3.8% fail on Wheel bearings (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.7% fail on
Suspension arms
(38% better than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Ball joint
- 0.57% fail on Pins and bushes (68% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.31% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.044% fail on Suspension arm
- 1.2% fail on Shock absorbers (72% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.78% fail on
Macpherson strut
(2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Pins and bushes (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Macpherson strut
- 0.17% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.70% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (84% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.22% fail on Ball joint
-
0.17% fail on
Sub-frames
(77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
- 0.087% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas
-
0.044% fail on
Axles
- 0.044% fail on Swivel pins and bushes
-
7.5% fail on
Springs
(170% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
17% fail on
Brakes
(30% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(41% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Service brake imbalance (190% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
-
5.5% fail on
Rbt (sp)
(150% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.0% fail on
Service brake performance
(65% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
(65% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Service brake performance (39% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Service brake imbalance (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.13% fail on Service brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
- 0.044% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
(65% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 3.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 0.044% fail on Decelerometer (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
(51% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(54% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.5% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.35% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance) (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Parking brake efficiency (Trikes, quads and pre-68 vehicles)
-
0.044% fail on
Decelerometer
- 0.044% fail on Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
(54% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.13% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.5% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Load sensing valves (6 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
2.4% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(62% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs
- 0.087% fail on Brake drums
-
0.78% fail on
Brake linings and pads
(44% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.74% fail on Brake pads (47% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Brake linings
-
0.35% fail on
Brake cables, rods, levers and linkages
- 0.26% fail on Lever (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Cable
-
1.4% fail on
Brake discs and drums
(62% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake control
(3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Lever (3 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes (55% better than other 2000 cars)
-
1.0% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(130% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.78% fail on Hand lever (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Pedal
-
0.57% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Anti-lock braking system (62% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.52% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(180% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.39% fail on Brake fluid (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Reservoirs
- 0.044% fail on Valves
-
0.39% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 0.35% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
0.26% fail on
Other components and prescribed areas
- 0.087% fail on Other components
-
0.087% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.044% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.044% fail on Other braking system component
- 0.087% fail on Additional braking device (21 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Flexible brake hoses
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(41% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
14% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
(41% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.5% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Joints (120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Flexible couplings
-
0.17% fail on
Prop shafts
- 0.17% fail on Joints
-
6.3% fail on
Drive shafts
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Exhaust system (81% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Doors
(89% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.35% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 0.35% fail on Door condition
-
0.31% fail on
Driver's door
- 0.31% fail on Door condition
-
0.31% fail on
Other passenger's door
- 0.31% fail on Door condition
-
0.35% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
0.39% fail on
Engine mounting
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Engine mounting condition (4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.044% fail on Bracket
-
0.35% fail on
Chassis
(66% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Chassis condition (66% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Body
- 0.13% fail on Panel
- 0.087% fail on Other body component
- 0.044% fail on Mounting fixings
-
0.22% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
(85% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (85% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Bumpers
-
0.22% fail on
Seats
- 0.17% fail on Passenger's seat
- 0.044% fail on Driver's seat
-
0.087% fail on
Boot lid
- 0.087% fail on Boot lid condition
-
0.044% fail on
Fuel system
- 0.044% fail on Fuel cap/sealing device
- 0.044% fail on Passenger compartment
-
6.5% fail on
Transmission
(120% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
13% fail on
Visibility
(69% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Wipers (61% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.6% fail on Washers (93% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.57% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.22% fail on
Condition of glass
- 0.22% fail on Windscreen
-
0.13% fail on
View to rear
- 0.13% fail on Mirrors
-
9.0% fail on
Steering
(140% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
6.1% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 6.1% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
3.2% fail on
Steering linkage components
(36% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Track rod end (49% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.17% fail on Ball joint
- 0.17% fail on Drag link end
-
0.044% fail on
Other components
- 0.044% fail on Steering linkage
- 0.044% fail on Locking devices
-
0.48% fail on
Power steering
- 0.31% fail on Operation
- 0.087% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.087% fail on Other components
-
6.1% fail on
Steering gear
(4 times worse than other 2000 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
7.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
7.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 5.3% fail on Catalyst emissions
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.17% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (88% better than other 2000 cars)
-
0.087% fail on
Emission control equipment
- 0.044% fail on Oxygen sensor
- 0.044% fail on NOx sensor
- 0.087% fail on Non catalyst emissions
-
0.22% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.13% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
- 0.087% fail on Emissions not tested
-
7.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.35% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.26% fail on Engine oil leaks
- 0.087% fail on Transmission oil leaks
-
7.5% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
6.5% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
(68% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(74% worse than other 2000 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Condition (5 times worse than other 2000 cars)
- 0.44% fail on Prescribed areas (77% better than other 2000 cars)
- 0.087% fail on Requirements
- 2.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (48% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
0.17% fail on
Airbags
- 0.17% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.4% fail on
Seat belts
(74% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
5.9% fail on
Tyres
- 3.1% fail on Tread depth
- 2.4% fail on Condition
- 0.57% fail on Size/type (180% worse than other 2000 cars)
-
1.3% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.3% fail on Registration plates
-
0.087% fail on
Speedometer and speed limiter
- 0.087% fail on Speedometer
-
0.044% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.044% fail on Attachment