Renault Clio MOT Results
Registered in 199941.9% pass rate
from 5,079 tests in 2017
(19% worse than other 1999 cars)
Pass rate by mileage
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 1999 cars and highlighted areas where the Renault Clio is unusually good or bad.
-
32% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
(33% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.9% fail on
Position lamps
(56% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.5% fail on Front lamps (37% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.6% fail on Rear lamps (98% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.16% fail on All position lamps
- 9.4% fail on Headlamp aim (41% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.8% fail on
Headlamps
(84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.8% fail on Headlamp (90% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Switch
- 0.020% fail on Matched pair
- 0.020% fail on Dipswitch
- 7.5% fail on Registration plate lamp (31% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Stop lamp
-
3.2% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.6% fail on Individual lamps (40% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.20% fail on Side repeaters (74% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Switch
-
3.2% fail on
Flashing type
-
3.0% fail on
Hazard warning
(9 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.8% fail on Lamp (13 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Switch (6 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.18% fail on Tell tale (11 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.6% fail on Battery (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Horn (140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.77% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(50% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.77% fail on Fog lamp (47% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.020% fail on Tell tale
- 0.20% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
- 0.14% fail on Electrical wiring
- 0.020% fail on Trailer electrical socket
- 0.020% fail on Rear reflectors
-
9.9% fail on
Position lamps
(56% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
27% fail on
Suspension
(25% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
8.4% fail on
Coil springs
(200% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Location
-
7.6% fail on
Drive shafts
(94% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
7.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.6% fail on Constant velocity joints (97% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Drive shafts
- 0.020% fail on Couplings
-
0.039% fail on
Any drive shaft which is part of the suspension
- 0.039% fail on Drive shafts
-
7.6% fail on
Front drive shafts
(96% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
6.3% fail on
Anti-roll bars
(29% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.8% fail on Linkage condition (190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.81% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.28% fail on Attachment
- 0.20% fail on Condition
-
5.4% fail on
Wheel bearings
(190% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.2% fail on Rear (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Front (72% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.6% fail on
Suspension arms
(36% better than other 1999 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (35% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Condition
- 0.039% fail on Attachment
-
2.3% fail on
Shock absorbers
(46% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 2.3% fail on Condition (46% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.1% fail on
Prescribed areas
(65% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Component mounting (64% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.37% fail on Subframe mounting (67% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Spring mounting (85% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Front suspension joints
-
0.51% fail on
Macpherson strut
- 0.51% fail on Condition
-
0.18% fail on
Tie bars/rods
- 0.12% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 0.039% fail on Attachment
- 0.020% fail on Condition
-
0.14% fail on
Sub-frames
(70% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Condition (78% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Attachment
- 0.020% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
0.098% fail on
Trailing arms
(79% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints (76% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.039% fail on
Radius arms
- 0.039% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
8.4% fail on
Coil springs
(200% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
19% fail on
Brakes
(12% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(19% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.2% fail on Front wheels (89% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 5.3% fail on Rear wheels (26% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.4% fail on Parking brake performance (28% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Brake imbalance (76% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.2% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.098% fail on Brake operation
- 0.098% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
5.4% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(20% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Components
(25% better than other 1999 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Valves (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Pipes (58% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.71% fail on Hoses (61% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.47% fail on Reservoirs (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.16% fail on Cylinders (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.63% fail on Leaks
- 0.18% fail on Operation
- 0.12% fail on Brake fluid warning lamp
-
4.6% fail on
Components
(25% better than other 1999 cars)
-
4.6% fail on
Parking brake
(3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
-
2.8% fail on
Hub components
- 1.8% fail on Brake pads
- 1.3% fail on Brake discs (75% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Wheel cylinder
- 0.039% fail on Brake drums
- 0.020% fail on Brake calipers
- 0.93% fail on ABS (34% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.26% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.26% fail on
Pedal
- 0.18% fail on Condition
- 0.079% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.26% fail on
Pedal
- 0.22% fail on Restricted movement
-
0.14% fail on
Mechanical components
- 0.079% fail on Lever (4 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.059% fail on Cable
-
0.059% fail on
Prescribed areas
- 0.039% fail on Park brake mechanism/associated mountings
- 0.020% fail on Master cylinder/servo mounting
- 0.039% fail on Locking devices
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
(19% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
16% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
(41% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 10% fail on Exhaust system (100% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 8.6% fail on Emissions (27% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Emissions not tested
-
0.18% fail on
Fuel system
(82% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on System (66% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.039% fail on Pipe
- 0.039% fail on Cap (88% better than other 1999 cars)
-
14% fail on
Driver's view of the road
(50% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 7.3% fail on Wipers (34% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Washers (94% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.59% fail on Windscreen
- 0.57% fail on Bonnet (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Mirrors
-
10% fail on
Tyres
(28% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Tread depth (38% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 4.1% fail on Condition
- 0.61% fail on Size/type (84% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Valve stem
-
10% fail on
Steering
(130% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
9.8% fail on
Steering system
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 6.9% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 3.0% fail on Track rod end (30% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Ball joint
- 0.14% fail on Steering arm
-
0.079% fail on
Free play
- 0.079% fail on Steering rack
- 0.039% fail on Drag link end
-
0.49% fail on
Power steering
- 0.24% fail on Operation
- 0.18% fail on Other components
- 0.14% fail on Pipes and hoses
- 0.039% fail on Pump
-
0.079% fail on
Steering control
- 0.079% fail on Steering column
- 0.039% fail on Steering operation
- 0.020% fail on Locking devices
- 0.020% fail on Prescribed areas
-
9.8% fail on
Steering system
(150% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
5.6% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
- 2.6% fail on Condition (3 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.3% fail on Prescribed areas (59% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.098% fail on Requirements
- 0.059% fail on Attachment
-
1.9% fail on
Supplementary restraint systems
- 1.7% fail on SRS Malfunction Indicator Lamp
- 0.22% fail on Drivers airbag
-
4.0% fail on
Seat belts
-
3.8% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 1.1% fail on Passengers other (2 times worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Drivers
- 0.24% fail on Passengers front
- 1.0% fail on Body condition (49% better than other 1999 cars)
-
0.57% fail on
Seats
(85% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.35% fail on Passengers (150% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.22% fail on Drivers
-
0.30% fail on
Vehicle structure
(75% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.30% fail on Chassis (75% better than other 1999 cars)
- 0.26% fail on Engine mountings (180% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
0.079% fail on
Load security
- 0.039% fail on Access panel
- 0.020% fail on Bootlid
- 0.020% fail on Tailgate
- 0.059% fail on Speedometer
- 0.039% fail on Body security
-
1.6% fail on
Doors
(140% worse than other 1999 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Registration plates and VIN
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate
- 0.020% fail on Vehicle Identification Number
-
0.32% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.24% fail on Condition (120% worse than other 1999 cars)
- 0.079% fail on Attachment (72% better than other 1999 cars)