Proton Savvy MOT Results

Registered in 2010
59.0% pass rate
from 251 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Savvy is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 12% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 7.6% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 7.6% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 5.2% fail on Service brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 2.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 2.0% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (sp) (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.0% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 2.0% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
          • 1.6% fail on Parking brake performance
          • 0.40% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
      • 0.40% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 5.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 4.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Electronic stability control (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.0% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.0% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.80% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.80% fail on Brake discs
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.2% fail on Pedal (8 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
  • 14% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 9.6% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.2% fail on Headlamps
      • 2.8% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.80% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.80% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.40% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.40% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.40% fail on Individual direction indicators
    • 0.40% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
    • 0.40% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.40% fail on Main beam tell-tale
      • 0.40% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 10% fail on Tyres
    • 6.0% fail on Condition (110% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 5.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 7.2% fail on Visibility
    • 6.8% fail on Wipers (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 0.40% fail on Condition of glass
      • 0.40% fail on Windscreen
    • 0.40% fail on Washers
  • 5.6% fail on Suspension (49% better than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on Wheel bearings (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.80% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.40% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.80% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joints
  • 5.2% fail on Steering (180% worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Steering gear (17 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 3.2% fail on Steering rack (18 times worse than other 2010 cars)
    • 2.0% fail on Power steering (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Pipes and hoses (56 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Other components (43 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
    • 0.40% fail on Steering wheel
  • 4.4% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 2.4% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.6% fail on Doors (9 times worse than other 2010 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Other passenger's door (28 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Door condition (22 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Catch
    • 0.40% fail on Transmission
      • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Joints
    • 0.40% fail on Body
      • 0.40% fail on Other body component
  • 3.2% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 3.2% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 3.2% fail on Spark ignition
        • 3.2% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
  • 0.40% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.40% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.40% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 0.40% fail on Airbags
      • 0.40% fail on Drivers airbag
  • 0.40% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.40% fail on Attachment
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages