Proton Savvy MOT Results
Registered in 201056.7% pass rate
from 208 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2010 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Savvy is unusually good or bad.
-
18% fail on
Brakes
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.3% fail on Service brake performance (160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Service brake imbalance
-
0.48% fail on
Plate brake tester
- 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.8% fail on
Rbt
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.9% fail on Rbt (sp)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 1.4% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.48% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
1.9% fail on
Rbt
- 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.48% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
-
0.48% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
5.3% fail on
Service brake performance
(160% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.8% fail on
ABS / EBS / ESC
(7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 3.8% fail on Anti-lock braking system (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Electronic stability control
-
2.4% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
(6 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Pedal (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Hand lever
- 1.4% fail on Flexible brake hoses (12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Parking brake control
- 0.96% fail on Lever
-
0.96% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.48% fail on Brake pads
-
0.48% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 0.48% fail on Brake discs
-
0.48% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
8.7% fail on
Brake performance
(120% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
10% fail on
Headlamp aim
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 9.6% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
4.8% fail on
Headlamps
- 3.8% fail on Headlamp
- 0.96% fail on Headlamp levelling device (5 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
-
0.96% fail on
Rear fog lamp
- 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Rear fog lamp
-
0.96% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(37 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (44 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Electrical equipment
- 0.96% fail on Battery(ies) (7 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Direction indicators
-
0.48% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.48% fail on Side repeaters
-
0.48% fail on
Flashing type
- 0.48% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
10% fail on
Headlamp aim
(2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
11% fail on
Visibility
(110% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 6.3% fail on Wipers (150% worse than other 2010 cars)
- 4.8% fail on Washers
- 0.48% fail on Bonnet
-
5.8% fail on
Steering
(140% worse than other 2010 cars)
-
2.9% fail on
Power steering
(34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Operation (33 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Other components (69 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Pipes and hoses (53 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering gear
(3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 1.4% fail on Steering rack (3 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
1.4% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.4% fail on Track rod end
-
2.9% fail on
Power steering
(34 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 3.8% fail on Exhaust system
-
0.96% fail on
Transmission
-
0.96% fail on
Drive shafts
- 0.48% fail on Drive shaft
- 0.48% fail on Joints
-
0.96% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.96% fail on
Doors
-
0.96% fail on
Other passenger's door
(12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Door condition (13 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
0.96% fail on
Other passenger's door
(12 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
5.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 2.9% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2010 cars)
- 0.96% fail on Emissions not tested
- 0.48% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
0.48% fail on
Compression ignition
- 0.48% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
-
4.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
0.96% fail on
Fluid leaks
- 0.96% fail on Hydraulic fluid leaks (140 times worse than other 2010 cars)
-
4.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
4.8% fail on
Suspension
(64% better than other 2010 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
-
0.96% fail on
Other suspension component
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint
- 0.48% fail on Ball joint dust cover
- 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
-
0.48% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 0.48% fail on Linkage ball joints
-
0.48% fail on
Sub-frames
- 0.48% fail on Sub-frame
- 0.48% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
-
4.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.8% fail on Condition
- 0.96% fail on Tread depth
- 0.48% fail on Size/type
-
0.48% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
0.48% fail on
Seat belts
- 0.48% fail on Prescribed areas
-
0.48% fail on
Seat belts
Read the Honest John Review
-
Proton Savvy (2006 - 2016)
Low prices and said to handle and ride quite well. Readers report that is reliable.