Proton Savvy MOT Results

Registered in 2009
56.2% pass rate
from 251 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2009 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Savvy is unusually good or bad.

  • 20% fail on Brakes (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 13% fail on Brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 9.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 9.2% fail on Rbt (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 7.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake imbalance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 6.0% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 5.6% fail on Rbt (sp) (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
      • 3.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.8% fail on Rbt (sp) (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake performance
        • 0.40% fail on Plate brake tester (sp)
          • 0.40% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 2.4% fail on Rbt (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
          • 2.4% fail on Parking brake performance (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 4.0% fail on Rigid brake pipes (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.6% fail on ABS / EBS / ESC (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Anti-lock braking system (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 2.0% fail on Electronic stability control (11 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 2.4% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 2.4% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 2.4% fail on Brake pads
    • 0.40% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.40% fail on Hand lever
    • 0.40% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.40% fail on Lever
  • 19% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 11% fail on Headlamp aim (2 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.6% fail on Headlamps
      • 3.2% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.40% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.0% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.6% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 1.6% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Position lamps
      • 1.2% fail on Position lamp
    • 1.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 0.80% fail on Direction indicators
      • 0.80% fail on Flashing type
        • 0.80% fail on Side repeaters
    • 0.80% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (51 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (63 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 0.80% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 0.40% fail on Battery(ies)
      • 0.40% fail on Horn
    • 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
      • 0.40% fail on Reversing lamps
  • 8.4% fail on Visibility
    • 7.2% fail on Wipers (180% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Washers
  • 7.6% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (100% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 6.4% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 6.0% fail on Spark ignition (190% worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 4.4% fail on Catalyst emissions (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 1.6% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 0.80% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.40% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.40% fail on Emissions not tested
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
  • 6.8% fail on Suspension (47% better than other 2009 cars)
    • 3.2% fail on Wheel bearings (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.2% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 0.80% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 0.40% fail on Linkage
    • 0.40% fail on Springs
      • 0.40% fail on Coil springs
        • 0.40% fail on Coil spring
    • 0.40% fail on Suspension arms
      • 0.40% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 0.40% fail on Sub-frames
      • 0.40% fail on Attachment bracket and mounting
    • 0.40% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
  • 5.6% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.4% fail on Exhaust system (160% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Doors (4 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Other passenger's door (8 times worse than other 2009 cars)
        • 0.80% fail on Door condition (9 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Front passenger's door
        • 0.40% fail on Door condition
    • 0.40% fail on Transmission
      • 0.40% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.40% fail on Drive shaft
  • 5.2% fail on Tyres
    • 3.6% fail on Condition
    • 2.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.40% fail on Size/type
  • 4.4% fail on Steering (130% worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 1.6% fail on Steering rack (7 times worse than other 2009 cars)
    • 1.6% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.6% fail on Track rod end
    • 1.2% fail on Power steering (13 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.80% fail on Other components (27 times worse than other 2009 cars)
      • 0.40% fail on Operation
  • 0.80% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.80% fail on Condition
Read the Honest John Review

Search Good Garages