MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Proton » Jumbuck » 2005

Proton Jumbuck MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.5% pass rate
from 163 tests in 2020
(12% worse than other 2005 cars)
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Jumbuck is unusually good or bad.

  • 19% fail on Suspension (12% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Anti-roll bars (20% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Linkage (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes
    • 6.1% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Suspension arms (7.8% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.1% fail on Suspension arm (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Ball joint (49% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Pins and bushes
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 1.8% fail on Springs (52% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (52 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Wheel bearings (19% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Suspension rods
      • 0.61% fail on Ball joint
  • 18% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment (11% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.9% fail on Electrical equipment (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Horn (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Battery(ies) (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.1% fail on Registration plate lamp(s) (22% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (33% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Headlamp aim (24% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp (44% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Direction indicators (10% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Flashing type (10% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Individual direction indicators (1.9% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Side repeaters (54% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Position lamps (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Position lamp (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Headlamps (77% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Headlamp (76% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 15% fail on Brakes (15% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Rigid brake pipes (200% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 8.6% fail on Brake performance (19% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.9% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.9% fail on Rbt (sp) (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 4.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.2% fail on Service brake performance (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (28% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (31% worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 3.7% fail on Service brake performance (55% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp) (11% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Rbt (sp) (5.4% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.61% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.61% fail on Rbt
          • 0.61% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 1.8% fail on Mechanical brake components (48% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.8% fail on Brake linings and pads (23% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.8% fail on Brake pads (23% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever (170% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Hand lever (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Parking brake control
      • 0.61% fail on Lever
    • 0.61% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.61% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
    • 0.61% fail on Other components and prescribed areas
      • 0.61% fail on Other components
  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 15% fail on Exhaust emissions (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 15% fail on Spark ignition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.7% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 4.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (64% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.7% fail on Emissions not tested (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 0.61% fail on Non catalyst emissions
      • 0.61% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.61% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.2% fail on Fluid leaks (190% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Engine oil leaks (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure (71% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.7% fail on Exhaust system (130% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Transmission (66% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.2% fail on Drive shafts (64% better than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.2% fail on Joints (63% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Chassis
      • 0.61% fail on Chassis condition
    • 0.61% fail on Fuel system
      • 0.61% fail on Hose
    • 0.61% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.61% fail on Spare wheel
      • 0.61% fail on Carrier
    • 0.61% fail on Body
      • 0.61% fail on Panel
    • 0.61% fail on Cabs
      • 0.61% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 9.8% fail on Steering (150% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 6.1% fail on Steering gear (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 6.1% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 4.3% fail on Steering linkage components (52% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.3% fail on Track rod end (68% worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility (8.1% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Wipers (46% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Washers (44% better than other 2005 cars)
  • 3.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems (39% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.7% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.7% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 3.1% fail on Tyres (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.8% fail on Tread depth (57% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.2% fail on Condition (60% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.61% fail on Size/type
  • 0.61% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 0.61% fail on Registration plates
  • 0.61% fail on Road Wheels
    • 0.61% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages