Proton Jumbuck MOT Results
Registered in 200555.7% pass rate
from 210 tests in 2017
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Jumbuck is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
-
7.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 7.1% fail on Fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Tell tale
- 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
-
4.3% fail on
Position lamps
- 3.3% fail on Front lamps
- 0.95% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.3% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
-
2.4% fail on
Direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
- 0.95% fail on Side repeaters
- 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
-
2.4% fail on
Flashing type
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Battery
-
1.9% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
7.6% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brakes
-
8.1% fail on
Brake performance
- 5.7% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
- 0.95% fail on Brake imbalance
- 0.95% fail on Rear wheels
- 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
- 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
7.6% fail on
Hydraulic systems
(99% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
7.1% fail on
Components
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Valves
- 0.95% fail on Leaks
-
7.1% fail on
Components
(100% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
1.9% fail on
Parking brake
- 1.9% fail on Condition
-
0.95% fail on
Hub components
- 0.95% fail on Brake pads
-
0.48% fail on
Service brake control components
-
0.48% fail on
Pedal
- 0.48% fail on Anti-slip
-
0.48% fail on
Pedal
- 0.48% fail on Locking devices
-
8.1% fail on
Brake performance
-
11% fail on
Suspension
(40% better than other 2005 cars)
-
5.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Spring mounting (75 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 1.9% fail on Component mounting
- 0.95% fail on Subframe mounting
-
4.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.4% fail on Linkage condition
- 0.95% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
-
1.9% fail on
Wheel bearings
- 1.4% fail on Rear
- 0.48% fail on Front
-
0.95% fail on
Suspension arms
- 0.95% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Shock absorbers
- 0.48% fail on Condition
-
0.48% fail on
Drive shafts
-
0.48% fail on
Front drive shafts
- 0.48% fail on Constant velocity joints
-
0.48% fail on
Front drive shafts
-
5.2% fail on
Prescribed areas
(4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
10% fail on
Driver's view of the road
- 7.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
- 0.95% fail on Windscreen
- 0.48% fail on Mirrors
-
8.1% fail on
Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.8% fail on Emissions
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems
(180% worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
6.2% fail on
Steering
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
- 3.8% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.4% fail on Track rod end
-
6.2% fail on
Steering system
-
6.2% fail on
Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.95% fail on Condition
-
2.4% fail on
Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.9% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
-
0.48% fail on
Vehicle structure
- 0.48% fail on Chassis
-
0.48% fail on
Road Wheels
- 0.48% fail on Attachment