MOT Results

Honest John Good Garage Guide MOT Results » Proton » Jumbuck » 2005

Proton Jumbuck MOT Results

Registered in 2005
51.2% pass rate
from 201 tests in 2020
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Jumbuck is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.0% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.0% fail on Rear fog lamp (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 5.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.0% fail on Headlamp aim
    • 2.5% fail on Position lamps
      • 2.5% fail on Position lamp
    • 2.0% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 2.0% fail on Electrical equipment
      • 1.5% fail on Horn
      • 1.00% fail on Battery(ies)
    • 1.5% fail on Direction indicators
      • 1.5% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.00% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.50% fail on All direction indicators
    • 1.00% fail on Headlamps (81% better than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.00% fail on Headlamp (80% better than other 2005 cars)
    • 0.50% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.50% fail on Switch
    • 0.50% fail on Mandatory tell-tales
      • 0.50% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale
  • 16% fail on Brakes
    • 9.5% fail on Brake performance
      • 6.5% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp) (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 6.5% fail on Rbt (sp) (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 5.5% fail on Service brake imbalance (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake performance (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.5% fail on Service brake performance
        • 3.5% fail on Rbt
          • 2.0% fail on Service brake performance
          • 1.5% fail on Service brake imbalance
      • 1.00% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 1.00% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 0.50% fail on Brake performance not tested
    • 3.5% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 1.5% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 1.5% fail on Pedal (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.5% fail on Parking brake control
      • 1.5% fail on Lever
    • 1.5% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 1.00% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 1.00% fail on Brake pads
      • 0.50% fail on Brake discs and drums
        • 0.50% fail on Brake discs
    • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic systems
      • 0.50% fail on Reservoirs
    • 0.50% fail on Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
      • 0.50% fail on Hydraulic brake cylinder
  • 15% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 14% fail on Exhaust emissions (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 14% fail on Spark ignition (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 8.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 5.0% fail on Catalyst emissions (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 1.5% fail on Emissions not tested
      • 0.50% fail on Compression ignition
        • 0.50% fail on Pre 01/07/2008 Non turbo
    • 1.00% fail on Fluid leaks
      • 1.00% fail on Engine oil leaks
  • 14% fail on Suspension
    • 6.0% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 3.0% fail on Linkage pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Linkage
    • 6.0% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 2.0% fail on Shock absorbers
    • 1.00% fail on Springs
      • 1.00% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas (37 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Sub-frames
      • 1.00% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 9.0% fail on Visibility
    • 6.5% fail on Wipers
    • 1.00% fail on Condition of glass
      • 1.00% fail on Windscreen (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Washers
    • 0.50% fail on Bonnet
  • 7.5% fail on Steering
    • 4.5% fail on Steering gear (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.5% fail on Steering rack (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 3.5% fail on Track rod end
  • 6.5% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.0% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 1.5% fail on Chassis (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 1.5% fail on Chassis condition (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 1.00% fail on Body
      • 0.50% fail on Panel
      • 0.50% fail on Other body component
    • 0.50% fail on Bumpers
    • 0.50% fail on Transmission
      • 0.50% fail on Drive shafts
        • 0.50% fail on Joints
  • 5.5% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 5.5% fail on Seat belts (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 5.0% fail on Prescribed areas (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 0.50% fail on Attachment
  • 3.5% fail on Tyres
    • 3.0% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.50% fail on Condition

Search Good Garages