Proton Jumbuck MOT Results

Registered in 2005

55.7% pass rate

from 210 tests in 2017

More MoT Results

Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Jumbuck is unusually good or bad.

22% fail on Lamps, Reflectors and Electrical Equipment
- 7.6% fail on Rear fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 7.1% fail on Fog lamp (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 0.48% fail on Tell tale
- 5.7% fail on Registration plate lamp
- 4.3% fail on Position lamps
  - 3.3% fail on Front lamps
  - 0.95% fail on Rear lamps
- 3.3% fail on Horn (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 2.9% fail on Stop lamp
- 2.4% fail on Direction indicators
  - 2.4% fail on Flashing type
    - 1.4% fail on Individual lamps
    - 0.95% fail on Side repeaters
    - 0.48% fail on All direction indicators
- 2.4% fail on Headlamp aim
- 1.9% fail on Battery
- 1.9% fail on Headlamps
  - 1.9% fail on Headlamp
- 0.48% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
15% fail on Brakes
- 8.1% fail on Brake performance
  - 5.7% fail on Front wheels (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Parking brake performance
  - 0.95% fail on Brake imbalance
  - 0.95% fail on Rear wheels
  - 0.48% fail on Service brake performance
  - 0.48% fail on Brake performance not tested
- 7.6% fail on Hydraulic systems (99% worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 7.1% fail on Components (100% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 6.7% fail on Pipes (140% worse than other 2005 cars)
    - 0.48% fail on Valves
  - 0.95% fail on Leaks
- 1.9% fail on Parking brake
  - 1.9% fail on Condition
- 0.95% fail on Hub components
  - 0.95% fail on Brake pads
- 0.48% fail on Service brake control components
  - 0.48% fail on Pedal
    - 0.48% fail on Anti-slip
- 0.48% fail on Locking devices
11% fail on Suspension (40% better than other 2005 cars)
- 5.2% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 3.3% fail on Spring mounting (75 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 1.9% fail on Component mounting
  - 0.95% fail on Subframe mounting
- 4.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
  - 2.4% fail on Linkage pins/bushes/ball joints
  - 1.4% fail on Linkage condition
  - 0.95% fail on Pins/bushes/ball joints
- 1.9% fail on Wheel bearings
  - 1.4% fail on Rear
  - 0.48% fail on Front
- 0.95% fail on Suspension arms
  - 0.95% fail on Condition (6 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Shock absorbers
  - 0.48% fail on Condition
- 0.48% fail on Drive shafts
  - 0.48% fail on Front drive shafts
    - 0.48% fail on Constant velocity joints
10% fail on Driver's view of the road
- 7.6% fail on Wipers
- 1.9% fail on Washers
- 0.95% fail on Windscreen
- 0.48% fail on Mirrors
8.1% fail on Exhaust, Fuel and Emissions
- 4.8% fail on Exhaust system
- 3.8% fail on Emissions
- 1.9% fail on Emissions not tested (3 times worse than other 2005 cars)
6.7% fail on Seat Belts and Supplementary Restraint Systems (180% worse than other 2005 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Seat belts (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 6.7% fail on Prescribed areas (10 times worse than other 2005 cars)
6.2% fail on Steering
- 6.2% fail on Steering system
  - 3.8% fail on Steering rack (5 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  - 2.4% fail on Track rod end
6.2% fail on Tyres
- 5.2% fail on Tread depth
- 0.95% fail on Condition
2.4% fail on Body, Structure and General Items
- 1.9% fail on Body condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
- 0.48% fail on Vehicle structure
  - 0.48% fail on Chassis
0.48% fail on Road Wheels
- 0.48% fail on Attachment