Proton Jumbuck MOT Results

Registered in 2003
50.8% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2021
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Jumbuck is unusually good or bad.

  • 22% fail on Suspension
    • 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 5.8% fail on Anti-roll bars
      • 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage
      • 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
    • 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
    • 3.3% fail on Sub-frames (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Springs
      • 0.83% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
    • 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
  • 17% fail on Brakes
    • 11% fail on Brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
          • 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
      • 4.2% fail on Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
        • 4.2% fail on Rbt (sp)
          • 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
          • 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
      • 2.5% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
      • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 0.83% fail on Rbt
          • 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
    • 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
    • 0.83% fail on Service brake pedal or hand lever
      • 0.83% fail on Pedal
    • 0.83% fail on Load sensing valves
    • 0.83% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 0.83% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 0.83% fail on Brake pads
  • 16% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 8.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
        • 8.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 4.2% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
    • 3.3% fail on Direction indicators
      • 3.3% fail on Flashing type
        • 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 0.83% fail on All direction indicators
        • 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
    • 2.5% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.7% fail on Headlamp
      • 0.83% fail on Headlamp levelling device
    • 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
    • 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.7% fail on Mandatory tell-tales (28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (40 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 0.83% fail on Position lamps
      • 0.83% fail on Position lamp
    • 0.83% fail on Hazard warning
      • 0.83% fail on Switch
    • 0.83% fail on Rear reflectors
  • 13% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 12% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 12% fail on Spark ignition
        • 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Fluid leaks (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 9.2% fail on Steering
    • 7.5% fail on Steering gear (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 7.5% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 2.5% fail on Steering linkage components
      • 1.7% fail on Track rod end
      • 0.83% fail on Ball joint
    • 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas
  • 8.3% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
    • 2.5% fail on Chassis (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 2.5% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
    • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
    • 1.7% fail on Floor (51 times worse than other 2003 cars)
  • 6.7% fail on Visibility
    • 5.0% fail on Wipers
    • 1.7% fail on Washers
    • 0.83% fail on Bonnet
  • 6.7% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 6.7% fail on Seat belts (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
      • 0.83% fail on Condition
  • 5.8% fail on Tyres
    • 3.3% fail on Condition
    • 1.7% fail on Tread depth
    • 0.83% fail on Size/type
  • 1.7% fail on Road Wheels
    • 1.7% fail on Attachment

Search Good Garages