Proton Jumbuck MOT Results
Registered in 200350.8% pass rate
from 120 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2003 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Jumbuck is unusually good or bad.
-
22% fail on
Suspension
- 14% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 2.5% fail on Pins and bushes (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Linkage
- 1.7% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
- 3.3% fail on Wheel bearings
-
3.3% fail on
Sub-frames
(4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Sub-frame mounting prescribed areas (13 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Springs
- 0.83% fail on Spring mounting prescribed areas
- 0.83% fail on Shock absorbers
-
17% fail on
Brakes
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt
-
4.2% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 3.3% fail on Service brake imbalance
- 0.83% fail on Service brake performance
-
4.2% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
2.5% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
- 2.5% fail on Rbt (sp)
- 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
0.83% fail on
Parking brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
- 0.83% fail on Parking brake performance
-
0.83% fail on
Rbt
-
4.2% fail on
Service brake performance
- 6.7% fail on Rigid brake pipes
-
0.83% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 0.83% fail on Pedal
- 0.83% fail on Load sensing valves
-
0.83% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
0.83% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 0.83% fail on Brake pads
-
0.83% fail on
Brake linings and pads
-
11% fail on
Brake performance
-
16% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
-
8.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Rear fog lamp (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Rear fog lamp
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
4.2% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
- 0.83% fail on Headlamp aim not tested
-
3.3% fail on
Direction indicators
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
- 1.7% fail on Individual direction indicators
- 0.83% fail on All direction indicators
- 0.83% fail on Side repeaters
-
3.3% fail on
Flashing type
-
2.5% fail on
Headlamps
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp
- 0.83% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 2.5% fail on Stop lamp
- 1.7% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
-
1.7% fail on
Mandatory tell-tales
(28 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Rear fog lamp tell-tale (40 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
0.83% fail on
Position lamps
- 0.83% fail on Position lamp
-
0.83% fail on
Hazard warning
- 0.83% fail on Switch
- 0.83% fail on Rear reflectors
-
8.3% fail on
Front and rear fog lamps
(5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
13% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
- 12% fail on Catalyst emissions (2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
12% fail on
Spark ignition
-
2.5% fail on
Fluid leaks
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Engine oil leaks (5 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
12% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
9.2% fail on
Steering
-
7.5% fail on
Steering gear
(8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 7.5% fail on Steering rack (8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
2.5% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
- 0.83% fail on Ball joint
- 0.83% fail on Prescribed areas
-
7.5% fail on
Steering gear
(8 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
- 4.2% fail on Exhaust system
-
2.5% fail on
Chassis
(3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 2.5% fail on Chassis condition (3 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Integral vehicle structure
- 1.7% fail on Integral vehicle structure condition
- 1.7% fail on Floor (51 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
- 0.83% fail on Bonnet
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 5.8% fail on Prescribed areas (4 times worse than other 2003 cars)
- 0.83% fail on Condition
-
6.7% fail on
Seat belts
(2 times worse than other 2003 cars)
-
5.8% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Condition
- 1.7% fail on Tread depth
- 0.83% fail on Size/type
-
1.7% fail on
Road Wheels
- 1.7% fail on Attachment