Proton Impian MOT Results

Registered in 2005
49.5% pass rate
from 91 tests in 2020
Failure rates by item

Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2005 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton Impian is unusually good or bad.

  • 23% fail on Suspension
    • 13% fail on Anti-roll bars (120% worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 4.4% fail on Linkage ball joint dust cover
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes (7 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage
      • 2.2% fail on Linkage ball joints
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage pins and bushes
      • 1.1% fail on Linkage attachment bracket and mounting
    • 8.8% fail on Shock absorbers (4 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 3.3% fail on Component mounting prescribed areas
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension arms
      • 1.1% fail on Suspension arm
      • 1.1% fail on Ball joint dust cover
    • 2.2% fail on Suspension rods (20 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Pins and bushes (81 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 21% fail on Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
    • 8.8% fail on Stop lamp
    • 6.6% fail on Direction indicators
      • 6.6% fail on Flashing type
        • 5.5% fail on Individual direction indicators
        • 1.1% fail on Side repeaters
    • 3.3% fail on Position lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Position lamp
    • 3.3% fail on Front and rear fog lamps
      • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
        • 3.3% fail on Rear fog lamp
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plate lamp(s)
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamps
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp
    • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
      • 1.1% fail on Headlamp aim
  • 20% fail on Brakes
    • 9.9% fail on Brake performance
      • 8.8% fail on Parking brake efficiency (sp)
        • 8.8% fail on Rbt (sp)
      • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance
        • 4.4% fail on Rbt
          • 4.4% fail on Parking brake performance
      • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
        • 2.2% fail on Rbt
          • 2.2% fail on Service brake performance
    • 6.6% fail on Mechanical brake components
      • 6.6% fail on Brake linings and pads
        • 6.6% fail on Brake pads
    • 4.4% fail on Rigid brake pipes
  • 14% fail on Body, chassis, structure
    • 5.5% fail on Exhaust system
    • 4.4% fail on Doors (8 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 3.3% fail on Other passenger's door (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 3.3% fail on Door condition (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 2.2% fail on Front passenger's door (14 times worse than other 2005 cars)
        • 2.2% fail on Door condition (15 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Bumpers (9 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Transmission
      • 2.2% fail on Drive shafts
        • 2.2% fail on Joints
    • 1.1% fail on Integral vehicle structure
      • 1.1% fail on Sub-frame
        • 1.1% fail on Strengthening plate
    • 1.1% fail on Fuel system
      • 1.1% fail on Pipe
  • 11% fail on Tyres
    • 9.9% fail on Condition (2 times worse than other 2005 cars)
    • 2.2% fail on Tread depth
  • 8.8% fail on Steering
    • 8.8% fail on Steering gear (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
      • 8.8% fail on Steering rack (13 times worse than other 2005 cars)
  • 8.8% fail on Noise, emissions and leaks
    • 8.8% fail on Exhaust emissions
      • 8.8% fail on Spark ignition
        • 5.5% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
        • 2.2% fail on Emissions not tested
        • 1.1% fail on Catalyst emissions
      • 1.1% fail on Compression ignition
        • 1.1% fail on On or after 01/01/2014
  • 5.5% fail on Visibility
    • 3.3% fail on Washers
    • 2.2% fail on Wipers
  • 3.3% fail on Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
    • 2.2% fail on Seat belts
      • 2.2% fail on Condition
    • 1.1% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp
  • 2.2% fail on Identification of the vehicle
    • 2.2% fail on Registration plates

Search Good Garages