Proton GEN-2 MOT Results
Registered in 201253.3% pass rate
from 60 tests in 2021
More MoT Results
Failure rates by item
Here you can drill down into the failure rates for each item on the test. We've also compared the rates to the average results for 2012 cars and highlighted areas where the Proton GEN-2 is unusually good or bad.
-
20% fail on
Brakes
(2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
10% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 10% fail on Rbt (sp) (9 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Parking brake performance
(17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt
(17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 6.7% fail on Parking brake performance (15 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Parking (secondary brake performance)
-
8.3% fail on
Rbt
(17 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 3.3% fail on Service brake performance
-
3.3% fail on
Rbt
- 1.7% fail on Brake performance not tested
-
1.7% fail on
Service Brake Efficiency (sp)
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
- 1.7% fail on Service brake performance
-
1.7% fail on
Rbt (sp)
-
10% fail on
Parking brake efficiency (sp)
(8 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
8.3% fail on
Mechanical brake components
-
6.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 6.7% fail on Brake pads
-
1.7% fail on
Brake discs and drums
- 1.7% fail on Brake discs
-
6.7% fail on
Brake linings and pads
- 3.3% fail on Rigid brake pipes (6 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Service brake pedal or hand lever
- 1.7% fail on Pedal
-
1.7% fail on
Brake actuators (including spring brakes or hydraulic cylinders)
- 1.7% fail on Hydraulic brake callipers
-
15% fail on
Brake performance
(4 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
20% fail on
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment
(120% worse than other 2012 cars)
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 8.3% fail on Headlamp (2 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Headlamp levelling device
- 5.0% fail on Stop lamp
-
5.0% fail on
Electrical equipment
(21 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 3.3% fail on Horn (24 times worse than other 2012 cars)
- 1.7% fail on Battery(ies)
-
3.3% fail on
Headlamp aim
- 3.3% fail on Headlamp aim
-
1.7% fail on
Hazard warning
- 1.7% fail on Switch
-
10% fail on
Headlamps
(3 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
6.7% fail on
Visibility
- 5.0% fail on Wipers
- 1.7% fail on Washers
-
6.7% fail on
Suspension
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
- 1.7% fail on Pins and bushes
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint
- 1.7% fail on Linkage ball joints
- 3.3% fail on Shock absorbers (5 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
1.7% fail on
Suspension arms
- 1.7% fail on Ball joint dust cover
-
5.0% fail on
Anti-roll bars
-
5.0% fail on
Body, chassis, structure
-
3.3% fail on
Transmission
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
- 3.3% fail on Joints
-
3.3% fail on
Drive shafts
-
1.7% fail on
Doors
-
1.7% fail on
Front passenger's door
- 1.7% fail on Door condition
-
1.7% fail on
Front passenger's door
-
3.3% fail on
Transmission
-
5.0% fail on
Tyres
- 3.3% fail on Tread depth
- 1.7% fail on Condition
-
3.3% fail on
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems
- 3.3% fail on SRS malfunction indicator lamp (7 times worse than other 2012 cars)
-
3.3% fail on
Noise, emissions and leaks
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
- 3.3% fail on Malfunction indicator lamp
-
3.3% fail on
Spark ignition
-
3.3% fail on
Exhaust emissions
-
1.7% fail on
Identification of the vehicle
- 1.7% fail on Registration plates
-
1.7% fail on
Steering
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
- 1.7% fail on Track rod end
-
1.7% fail on
Steering linkage components
Read the Honest John Review
-
Proton GEN-2 (2004 - 2016)
Decent ride and handling. Tidy styling. Keen pricing.